tor-relays

tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

36 participants
4815 discussions

Re: [tor-relays] using Curve p25519 cryptography for type 2(Mixmaster) and type 3(mixminion) remailer blocks
by grarpamp 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:14 PM, gwen hastings <gwen(a)cypherpunks.to> wrote: >>> ... >>> I am looking at resurrecting >>> >>> mixmaster, mixminion and nym.alias.net nymserver designs from the >>> various code wastebaskets and retrofit them with some newer encryption >>> technology based on curve25519 and poly-1305 libsodium based algorithms >>> and routines. I believe there is sufficient demand to merit deployment of a good mix network. As well as perhaps web/other intake frontends due to the now prevalent a) dwindling free email b) demand by mail providers for phone authentication. As for operators, I'd reach out to the Tor, I2P, Bitcoin, etc operators. It's a shame that one of the hardest things to find these days is anonymous free speech in the simple form of the written word.

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] System Time
by Moritz Klammler 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Hi, if the time difference is too big, NTP will refuse to touch the clock altogether. You can force an update by the '-g' option. However, the adjustment might still be slow. I'd do the following (as root): # hwclock --set --utc --date="2014-01-14 22:05:35" # ntpd -qg The first command manually sets the hardware clock to the approximate correct time (which you should adjust, of course). Note that the date string must specify the time in your local timezone, despite the '--utc' option. The second command tells NTP to do a one-shot sync ('-q') and allow an initial big adjustment ('-g'). Then, for the future, just make sure you have the NTP daemon enabled to keep the clock in sync. On Debian, if you have installed the 'ntp' package, this should be fine. Happy Hacking Moritz Jeroen Massar <jeroen(a)massar.ch> writes: > On 2014-01-14 21:05, I wrote: >> Jeroen, >> >> Thank you. It did that but I can't see a change. > > NTP adjusts slowly, as your clock is 6+ hours off, you should force the > timesync first, eg with with rdate (apt-get install rdate): > > rdate -v ntp.xs4all.nl > > should do the trick. Then after that make sure that ntpd is running: > /etc/init.d/ntp restart > >> The VPS person said it is set to UTC. Previously on another VPS it >> was another relay in the ?circuit which had the time difference. > > UTC is a timezone, and having that is great as it avoids all the > pitfalls and annoyances with summer/winter time. > > Note that some VPSs do not allow changing of the time, one will have to > ask the host to set the time. > > Do note that a VPS can be inspected and controlled easily by the Host, > as such, make sure that you trust that operator. > > Greets, > Jeroen -- OpenPGP: Public Key: http://openpgp.klammler.eu Fingerprint: 80C1 EC79 B554 3D84 0A35 A728 7057 B288 CE61 2235

2 1

Throughput changes?
by Thomas Themel 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

Hi, I've been running two nodes on the same machine for some time because I was unable to get enough throughput to blow through my bandwidth budget otherwise. However, something seems to have changed recently, since right now I'm blasting through about double my usual bandwidth (~25 MB/s) with the two tor jobs at only ~60% CPU usage each while previously it was always CPU limited. This doesn't seem to correlate with any software updates on the machine. Here's atlas: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3DD2523F1B241F01D54818F327714CDA7F542… ciao, -- [*Thomas Themel*] [Albulastrasse 52] To begin with, GNU will be a kernel [...] [ CH-8048 Zürich ] - RMS announcing GNU in 1983 [*+41 78 9070988*]

4 8

recent OVH feedback?
by Alan Turing 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

Dear all, I am currently running a fairly large tor relay (no exit, due to OVH's restrictive policies) and would like to know if other people have made experiences with running non-exit relays using OVH's services. Did any contracts get canceled or did you receive any kind of (legal) threats by OVH for doing so? Have you made positive experience with OVH regarding non-exit relays? I'd be grateful for information. regards, s.

3 2

404: /tor/keys/fp-sk/print-print not found
by nano 12 Jan '14

12 Jan '14

I haven't looked into this at all yet, thought I would share it here first. Both my exit relays [0] received these repeated warnings around the same time yesterday: timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from server 'server1IP:port' while fetching "/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0". timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from server 'server2IP:port' while fetching "/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0". timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from server 'server3IP:port' while fetching "/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0". timestamp [warn] Received http status code 404 ("Not found") from server 'server4IP:port' while fetching "/tor/keys/fp-sk/A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0-A1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q7R8S9T0". Only one timestamp and serverIP was consistent on both relays. All fingerprints, however, were consistent on both. Hasn't appeared before or since. Anything to worry about? Thanks. [0] https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/799B025E25850A88CD133276301FAFB731C2E… -- syn.bsdbox.co

3 4

Re: [tor-relays] One relay shown as two
by Andy45 11 Jan '14

11 Jan '14

Thanks to everyone who replied to my question. I guess I'll just be patient then! The funny thing is that I never did reinstall Tor/Vidalia... although I got one working then the other with different configs for a while. That may have been it. Thanks! Andy

1 0

One relay shown as two relays in Atlas
by Andy45 10 Jan '14

10 Jan '14

Hello all! My question is related to Atlas. I asked this question on Tor help and I was referred to here. Here are my questions: I run a small exit relay on my computer. (Nickname is Andy45 and IP address is 108.249.221.251 if you want to look at this problem on Atlas for your self.) When I look up my relay on the Atlas, the relay is displayed as two separate relays with differing bandwidths and different uptimes. I'm not sure what's up with that - but my best guess is that it is splitting the amount of bandwidth I donate in half? The one of the average bandwidths listed on Atlas is a fair amount less than what the bandwidth monitor shows I give. (70 kbps rather than 100+ kbps.) Thanks, Andy

3 2

Hidden Service web design to speed load times
by Gordon Morehouse 09 Jan '14

09 Jan '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hey folks, I've been off the list for quite a long time due to personal reasons, and I'm aware I have a couple irons still in the fire WRT RasPi and the SYN flood stuff - I'll get to it. Today, though, I came across this article: http://csswizardry.com/2013/01/front-end-performance-for-web-designers-and-… tl;dr you can add a 'dns-prefetch' link tag in the HEAD of HTML documents to do DNS lookups ASAP, instead of later on when the browser parses the content which does it, or your Javascript (yeah, I know) does it, etc. I'm wondering if this would have any value for Tor hidden services - would a "DNS lookup" of a .onion force Tor to start building a circuit to the hidden service in question? I suppose one could deliberately request a nonexistent file or a 1x1 pixel PNG or something, too, to get the circuit built, but this is obviously a little cleaner and probably a little better for privacy versus an HTTP request which may be logged even if the user never takes an action to *actually* request real info. Just a thought for hidden service operations. It's always easier to get one's message out the less time it takes to load. Best, - -Gordon M. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSztxfAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujrx8IAJyREaH6TZ2z5GjBPrZfZcir fWi5zfwO/t/we/uQzn0IriM8DIMvLQOHS1Z9ly/qzUyoBLPRxzUqPpkzmtzXgXOy l2bAhmRCSyGZXDgE4GAXpVXP8w2w3fb7ijJADqy+I/nqQYZX7MMzlcT8hlsqqon9 I39ITwbDoUuem+y/XG/IICcbTVBsrH3m2auhRBfHawAJW8iO6xooltyUS6JExxLB fALfaG64YOy8mv+eyOT4tYoP67r8miEDlmTnplARUKw458lihqlnZ1TrCN+AVaJt OJCXiDnqghvBAJE+v/5JWJOMDr90ucI/+9mitOmbbQh03JOSRsSryeffPmUN08c= =gl1d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

VPS ports closed
by I 09 Jan '14

09 Jan '14

Is there a way to open ports for Tor as an VPS account holder? Robert ____________________________________________________________ FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!

5 7

How to force VPS to update to current release?
by I 08 Jan '14

08 Jan '14

Anyone, On a new VPS putting the right entries in the sources.list won't get the current release. apt-get update or upgrade gets with more Ign http://torproject.org tor-experimental-0.2.5.x-precise/main Translation-en W: Failed to fetch http://torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/precise/main/binar y-i386/Packages Undetermined Error [IP: 38.229.72.14 80] Either could someone tell me how to force an update from the very old Ubuntu held one I managed to get or tell me how to get to the current package some other way? Searching for help for Linux without sufficient jargon is hard. Robert ____________________________________________________________ FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium

5 11

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

tor-relays