- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Leaky-pipe circuit topology
by marziyeh latifi 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Hello, May you explain me what is Leak-pipe circuit topology? I studied Leaky-pipe circuit topology in "tor- design" document but I don't understand how it work! thanks best regards marzieh

2 1

Bandwidth limiting at relay or network?
by Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T. 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Good evening fellow relay operators, I haven't ever taken the time to configure bandwidth limits in torrc, always preferring to manage it at the firewall as we have other bandwidth limits set there as well. However, I'm curious - what do other relay operators prefer? Make your day great, Isaac Grover, Senior I.T. Consultant Aileron I.T. - " Because #ProactiveIsBetter " O: 715-377-0440<tel:715-425-0440>, F:715-690-1029<tel:715-690-1029>, W: www.aileronit.com<http://www.aileronit.com/> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/IsaacGrover/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqrwZNFKdR-guKtuQzFPObQ

3 2

Consensus weight drops continuously 28h after getting guard flag
by Ilka Schulz 16 Jan '19

16 Jan '19

Hi, approx. 28 hours after getting the guard flag, my relay <https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A99B0D9E5FD5BC3C8F2D006EC91F…>'s consensus weight hit a peak and has declined rather rapidly since then (again 28 hours ago). Did I do something wrong? Is it because I restarted the relay 52 hours ago? Is there actually any detailed documentation on how consensus weight is calculated? Also, my bandwidth (as well as my cpu, etc.) is only used to a fraction of its capacity, even though my relay is three weeks old now. The /RelayBandwidthRate/ option does not limit here... Regards, Ilka

6 11

Torproject onion-repo down (sdscoq7snqtznauu.onion/torproject.org) ?
by petrarca＠protonmail.ch 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Is it just me having issues - today, I couldn't reach the onion-repository of torproject.org at sdscoq7snqtznauu.onion anymore. It was working until very recently though. Everything else is working fine (internet, other onion services, etc.) and I didn't change anything really (just an upgrade to tor 0.3.5.7)...

2 1

Server sale on online.net
by niftybunny 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Tor friendly (even Exist), no bw costs, you should check it out or not. I do not get anything from this. Cheers, markus

1 0

Fallback Directory Mirror
by [REDACTED] 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Hi, i run 17 Entrys and one bridge at the moment. I dont plan to change the IP adresses or the ports and most of them are already paid for nearly two years and i dont see a reason to switch them off after that time so if more fallback directory mirrors are needed then feel free to add them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ome of them are still pretty new but i am sure they will get older:)

1 0

community team highlights: Relay Advocacy
by nusenu 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [tor-project] community team highlights -- November and December Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:15:00 +0000 From: Alison Macrina <alison(a)torproject.org> Reply-To: tor-project(a)lists.torproject.org To: tor-project(a)lists.torproject.org Relay Advocacy ================================================================== Colin resumed running once a month IRC relay operator meetings. He also started planning the FOSDEM relay operator meet-up. Steph and Colin are working on updating the relay flyers. Colin continues to work on communicating with OVH regarding relays without contactinfo added to the network. Finally, Colin has been working with Bill from EFF on a Tor relay challenge.

9 10

New Fallbacks from December 2018
by teor 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Dear Relay Operators, Thanks to everyone who opted-in their relays as fallback directory mirrors. We rebuilt the list of fallbacks in December 2018. [0] The new list was released in Tor 0.3.5.6-rc, and it was backported to all supported Tor releases. [1] The FallbackDir flags on Consensus Health [2] have been updated. The flags on Relay Search [3] might take a few days to update. Don't worry if your relay missed out this time. It's still helping Tor users. And we will rebuild the fallback list again in 6-12 months time. We are tracking fallback changes in this ticket [4]. To opt-in your relays, add a comment to the ticket [4], or reply to this thread. If you have multiple relays, you can opt-in as many as you like. (We picked up to 7 per operator this time, and we may pick more next time.) T [0]: https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/or/fallback_dirs.inc https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24801 [1]: 0.2.9, 0.3.3, 0.3.4, 0.3.5, and 0.4.0. See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/teams/NetworkTeam/CoreTor… [2]: https://consensus-health.torproject.org/graphs.html [3]: For example, this relay is a new fallback: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/0C039F35C2E40DCB71CD8A07E97C… [4]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28794 T -- teor ----------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Adding Obfuscation Types To Windows Bridge
by Keifer Bly 15 Jan '19

15 Jan '19

Hello, So I am running an obfuscated bridge using the tor expert bundle and the compiled version of obfs4. There are some questions I wanted to ask. So, I am looking to add pluggable transports to my bridge, which currently only supports obfs4. I do not have access to any services that offer domain fronting, or third party servers, so I cannot run meek as a result. However, is it possible to add more than one pluggable transport, such as Format-Transferring Encryption or ScrambleSuit and also have obfs4? Are there compiled versions of these pluggable transports for windows? I also wanted to ask, do I need to update obfs4.exe when I update tor.exe? Another question, so I have in my torrc file, Contact Info: followed by an obfuscated version of this email address. However, as seen on my bridge listing at https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/148BD64BED9F2C27637D986DE032… The contact into does not appear. I do not want to give this email address out publicly, but I do want to register with bridge authorities so they can contact me if something is wrong with my bridge. Here is my torrc, with the ContactInfo line listed. Nickname torland ContactInfo keifer dot bly at gmail dot com SOCKSPort 0 # no local SOCKS proxy ORPort 9002 # public bridge must have an open ORPort ExtORPort auto # configure ExtORPort for obfs4proxy ExitPolicy reject *:* # no exits allowed BridgeRelay 1 # relay won't show up in the public consensus PublishServerDescriptor 1 # publish to the bridge authority # use obfs4proxy to provide obfs4 on port 9003 ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec C:\Users\keife\AppData\Roaming\tor\PluggableTransports\obfs4proxy.exe ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:9003 Thanks all very much. --Keifer

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] why the network lost 350 relays and some, bridges
by Argo2 12 Jan '19

12 Jan '19

I was intrigued by the high number of consumer IP's that these relay are supposed to be running on while seemingly automated updating the relay version. The nickname made me look into Ubuntu Snaps as a possible tor distribution which led me to this snap: https://snapcraft.io/tor-middle-relay. It was last updated the 9th of January and when you download the stable snap it is actually named 'snap269'. So the maintainer in this case is the snap maintainer, but not necessarily the relay(s) operator. I have not looked into how these snaps actually work but it may be the case that they actually needed the PortForwaring functionality to get tor running inside a snap. Given that information it could very well be the case that these relays are not running behind a NAT and not run by the same operator but actually by a group of different people. > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:07:00 +0000 > From: nusenu <nusenu-lists(a)riseup.net> > >> this occurred when these relays upgraded from tor 0.3.3.10 to 0.3.4.9 >> (package maintainer update) >> >> All these relays were behind NAT devices and they relied on a tor >> feature that got removed between these two versions: >> >>> o Removed features: >>> - The PortForwarding and PortForwardingHelper features have been >>> removed. [...]https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25409 > > I guess I somehow expected that: the maintainer patched tor 0.3.4.10 to added this > feature again and here we go again with the flood of relays using that version of tor: > > 79 relays from 2019-01-11: > > | Up | Ext | JoinTime | Nickname | Version | IP | AS | CC | ORp | Dirp | OS | Contact | eFamMembers | FP | > |------+-------+------------+------------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------+------+-------+--------+-------+-----------+---------------+------------------------------------------| > | 0 | 0 | 01:06:55 | snap269 | 0.3.4.10 | 117.104.229.222 | Instatelecom Limited | af | 43453 | 0 | Linux | None | 1 | CF52FF9F481C618E540D5DACB0C2875F1B7687B5 | > | 0 | 0 | 01:27:25 | snap269 | 0.3.4.10 | 90.253.141.146 | Vodafone Limited | gb | 46089 | 0 | Linux | None | 1 | B483C5FE8A2888F8E02885D8488404DBBEFBCF3B | > [SNIP]

3 3