- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Bandwidth measured is low
by Pierre L. 07 Feb '16

07 Feb '16

Hey, In arm console, there's since few days a very low bandwidth measured. Something like 10% : *Bandwidth (limit: 720 Kb/s, burst: 960 Kb/s, measured: 96.0 b/s) *There are some topics about this on the www, and I've understood it can be a bug, but only 1 or 2 years ago and nothing really new. This is a home little relay contribution, with 900 to 1000 kb/s upload available, no bandwidth server killer inside my LAN... So do this bug is today solved, so I got a problem ? Is there something to do to solve it, on my config ? ps: RPi v1, Raspbian v8 Jessie Thx for your light :)

2 3

Issues with offline master key functionality
by Riccardo Mori 05 Feb '16

05 Feb '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, Two months ago I decided to try the new ed25519 key introduced in Tor 2.7 with OfflineMasterKey set so I can keep the master key in a different place and just upload the medium-term signing key every month. Last month everything went ok: I renewed the key and Tor accepted it. This time instead after generating the new signing key with # tor --datadirectory path_to_my_master_key --signingkeylifetime '1 months' --keygen and uploading ed25519_signing_cert and ed25519_signing_secret_key and fixing the permission, Tor keep saying Feb 03 07:27:40.000 [notice] It looks like I need to generate and sign a new medium-term signing key, because the one I have is expired. To do that, I need to load the permanent master identity key. Feb 03 07:27:40.000 [warn] We needed to load a secret key from /var/lib/tor/keys/ed25519_master_id_secret_key, but couldn't find it. Did you forget to copy it over when you copied the rest of the signing key material? Feb 03 07:27:40.000 [warn] Can't load master identity key; OfflineMasterKey is set. Feb 03 07:27:40.000 [err] Error initializing keys; exiting That raises two questions to me: - why does Tor think the new keys are already expired? - why is Tor searching ed25519_master_id_secret_key? With OfflineMasterKey set it shouldn't care about the master secret key Thank you, patacca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWsgVWAAoJEE1LNuolWAxg12QP/iy/rd0cPPt8WhzXXCmlRwRi vNFZ2PO6ltpS9uu0HRgUExpDGG1QY8eLUZxRUPCg1lFPbu/tsfHo+Rz3RB6iAg0Q rkqkSen4vjAboA2PTfyu6oLQEqX4zHyJ4RaFZcdemgYdm4/B1pbZVMYOgI1EiJQj bX/WSyjPlAF5gXhWW+F1UH/ucCLcue8LumWdd2qGSILVInzEcXfM2myTi4NRZJry pearKYlMMSt70+qM7ivBKelYp3iMpZjUZOQa4rDmNEvWncWmHDi+QxggsKBGJ/Kf ZqwVuatCQT56B10GNGZrc5bUx1cbBjdXj4wMLh3D/8wxMIJztPB9rEI2+C2GzP3d asG054o2GHQ5HISQqFuFTZ4dzyjudV/g3HbA78kXcLXrTuSVSV0vZ8cEqACiaYSI dFfIjNTevr9WgWbXPfKFzILAGlBS6gUWJflh8eQY539Jg0LnJI4XpSbSFlvAU8dQ fzZSLnUGdPC0w8dcPpSeS+ojxiQ1cv7qQoeubpyXvO16ATlxDZ6SW9WwFDKEN72N xUOwIBGBpj6Onq8UuieMRTqolcd5jc96/4Y1rVCUeegRts+0RloW+ftODf5MjcyR 5uvbvyrm9J9AsAzFkK+ZI7Xi+Fad4lR1rsdM7t9jWndHFb83DEKDOJPyq+aFgk+r 00IxrkcEOwzQUf68QLcP =xN1c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
by Virgil Griffith 05 Feb '16

05 Feb '16

For example, these two pairs of relays that came online yesterday: * https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0ED2D734F295427E5A3719FA7B9985C335839… * https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/667C297D3EC6E1281D68F7F4C8C9BE8324D13… and * https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/667C297D3EC6E1281D68F7F4C8C9BE8324D13… * https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/2FF21F475C2E668C23DB7625A9D45B52591B3… (Hat-tip to Sean Saito for pointing these out.) No wrong answer---just wondering what is the community's vibe on this issue. I can go either way. -V

6 9

"Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat:...)" every hour or so?
by Deep Lodokus 03 Feb '16

03 Feb '16

Hi All! Running a TOR relay on a Raspberry Pi B+, not overclocked, over WiFi, running Raspbian. TOR is capped at RelayBandwidthRate 1000 KBytes and RelayBandwidthBurst 1500 KBytes While my /var/log/tor/log suggests that all is fine, my tor-arm logs suggest otherwise. See some copy/paste from logs below. Is something wrong with my setup? If there's indeed a loss of connectivity every hour or so, should I refrain from running this relay altogether? I haven't tried to connect the Raspberry Pi directly with a network cable, I could try that. Thanks! Snippet from /var/log/tor/log: *Jan 28 19:30:51.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 576/576 TAP, 1281/1281 NTor.Jan 29 01:30:51.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 12:00 hours, with 23 circuits open. I've sent 565.53 MB and received 604.21 MB.Jan 29 01:30:51.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 98.805%* Snippet from tor-arm logs: * │ 21:26:44 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 21:26:17 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 21:26:07 2016) │ 20:04:22 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 20:03:56 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 20:03:42 2016) │ 19:30:51 [NOTICE] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 639/639 TAP, 1104/1104 NTor. │ 19:30:51 [NOTICE] TLS write overhead: 3% │ 19:30:51 [NOTICE] Average packaged cell fullness: 98.954% │ 19:30:51 [NOTICE] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 6:00 hours, with 40 circuits open. I've sent 1.72 GB and received 1.76 GB. │ 19:18:33 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 19:18:12 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 19:17:57 2016) 21:26:07 2016) │ 18:21:37 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 18:21:15 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 18:21:00 2016) │ 17:22:44 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 17:22:16 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 17:22:02 2016) │ 16:14:26 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 16:14:10 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 16:13:55 2016) │ 15:19:40 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 15:19:13 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 15:19:02 2016) │ 14:04:23 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay resumed │ 14:04:01 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Fri Jan 29 14:03:48 2016) │ 13:30:51 [NOTICE] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 593/593 TAP, 895/895 NTor.*

2 3

tor middle node question
by Markus Koch 03 Feb '16

03 Feb '16

hi, as a good TOR support peon I got a dedicated server and set up TOR 3-4 weeks ago. Everything went great, I got my Guard, Fast and Stable etc. Flag and my little server was busy & happy. After restarting the TOR daemon I lost all my flags and even after 12 hours I only got Running and Valid back. What went wrong? My server is: https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=caf1eea0e8e8919dfc480a8… Markus

8 10

Nameservers fail and come back at the same time?
by SuperSluether 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

My exit node's consensus weight just jumped from 20 to 1750 overnight. When I checked to see how things were going, my log file is full of nameserver problems, happening every couple of minutes: Jan 31 14:12:40.000 [warn] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Jan 31 14:12:40.000 [notice] eventdns: Nameserver 8.8.4.4:53 is back up Jan 31 14:18:35.000 [warn] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Jan 31 14:18:35.000 [notice] eventdns: Nameserver 8.8.4.4:53 is back up Jan 31 14:20:53.000 [warn] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Jan 31 14:20:53.000 [notice] eventdns: Nameserver 8.8.4.4:53 is back up Jan 31 14:20:59.000 [warn] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Jan 31 14:20:59.000 [notice] eventdns: Nameserver 8.8.4.4:53 is back up But the "All nameservers have failed" and "Nameserver xxx is back up" messages happen in pairs /at the exact same time./ What's going on here, and is there a way to fix this? My VPS has 2 nameservers listed for it, should I be using those? At any rate, my exit node is still getting enough traffic to hit the bandwidth limit, so I'm assuming it's still functioning at some capacity. Here's the Atlas link if anyone wants to check out the details: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D632232DDC823D00ACB4F99668B58B2D5BCFF…

4 8

Keypair Error
by Alan 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

I updated my relay and after installing the update, I pasted my private keypair in the right file... But in ARM it keeps saying "[WARN] http status 400 ("Looks like your keypair does not match its older value.”)" How do I fix this? Alan This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

2 1

What does this message mean in my tor logs?
by Pat Scharmer 31 Jan '16

31 Jan '16

Hi all, I’m running a server with a couple of relays and was getting good overall performance (120+ Mbps) up until a couple days ago. For the last two days, the log for one of the two relays is showing thousands of the following message: [notice] Resolved [scrubbed] which was already resolved ignoring Prior to yesterday, I hadn’t ever seen this message in my log (and the second relay on this same server/same IP is not showing any such messages). Since this started, my throughput has dropped from around 120Mbps to about 80Mbps. Looking around on the internet, I can’t find anything about this message. My server is running tor 2.7.6 on Ubuntu. The relay in question is: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE67A1BA4EF1D13A617AEFB416CB9E44331B2… <https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE67A1BA4EF1D13A617AEFB416CB9E44331B2…> Any suggestions on what might be going would be appreciated. Thanks in advance! Regards, -Pat

3 5

(undeclared) luaktt family running modified version of tor with more logging?
by nusenu 30 Jan '16

30 Jan '16

Hi, ornetradar spotted your group of relays [1][2] presumably running [3]. Thanks for setting the ContactInfo field. Would you mind setting MyFamily as well? [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/937 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/945 [3] https://github.com/LuaKT/Tor/commits/master

1 0

Webiron
by Nicholas Suan 30 Jan '16

30 Jan '16

Looks like Webiron is spamming again, and this time they're including a web bug in the mail to see if you've opened it: https://www.webiron.com/images/misc/91.219.236.218/abuse@1d4.us/webiron-log… https://www.webiron.com/abuse_feed/abuse@1d4.us

8 9