- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

ExtOrPort settings for obsf4, obfs3 and firewall
by Cristian Consonni 02 Aug '18

02 Aug '18

Hi, Form the instructions to install obsf4: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports/obfs4… --- ``` ExtORPort auto ``` [...] ``` [notice] Registered server transport 'obfs4' at '[::]:46396' ``` Remember the random port associated to your bridge needs to be open for incoming connections. You can find it from the logs: it's 46396 in this example. --- I can assume that using `ExtORPort auto` would mean that potentially any time Tor is restarted or reload a new port will be picked. Furthermore, in this thread[1] it is said: --- [...] ExtORPort tells tor to open a local-only (bound to localhost) socket for getting information from / communicating with obfsproxy --- So, if I want to be sure to know in advance which firewall port I should let open it is better that I choose a fixed port. Also, that port needs only to accept connections from localhost, i.e. the loopback interface? The only port that needs to be reachable from anywhere is the ORPort? Also, in this answer on Tor Stack Exchange[2] it is said that is possible to run both obfs3 and obfs4 from the same bridge. Is this useful/recommended? Also, in the answer: --- I had to make port forwards for the given obfs ports in iptables (easy with gufw) as well as in my hardware (internet-)firewall to make things work. So I am not so sure that the ExORPort is for local connections only as mentioned by Rodger (please let me know if I am wrong here). --- Thanks in advance (I am sorry for the flood of stupid question, but I prefer to ask a stupid question that having things not work and not understanding why...) C [1]: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2014-February/003909.html [2]: https://tor.stackexchange.com/a/6735

3 7

Re: [tor-relays] AS awareness
by Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T. 02 Aug '18

02 Aug '18

Hi Conrad, Back in 2017 I used atlas to find lowly represented ASs and countries with regards to exits, sought out hosting providers in those areas, contacted each of them to determine if Tor exits were allowed per their TOS, and based on those responses, set up four exits with a restrictive policy all in different countries with different providers, and they were all shut down within two months. When asked why, each of them basically responded the same: 'we didn't know what a Tor exit was when you first asked'. So the challenge isn't necessarily that exits are or aren't allowed, but rather the providers haven't been properly educated or use a boilerplate TOS without proper vetting. Make your day great, Isaac Grover, Senior I.T. Consultant Aileron I.T. - "Practical & Proactive I.T. Solutions" Office: 715-377-0440, Fax:715-690-1029, Web: www.aileronit.com

1 0

new fingerprint
by TorGate 01 Aug '18

01 Aug '18

Hi, what is the best solution to change the tor fingerprint ? TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk

2 2

DirCache on low-memory hosts
by Michael Brodhead 01 Aug '18

01 Aug '18

Those of you running relays on low-RAM hosts, what do you do about DirCache? When I first brought up my relay I noticed this message in the logs: [warn] Being a directory cache (default) with less than DIRCACHE_MIN_MEM_MB MB of memory is not recommended and may consume most of the available resources, consider disabling this functionality by setting the DirCache option to 0. When I DirCache to 0 I see another warning: [warn] DirCache is disabled and we are configured as a relay. This may disqualify us from becoming a guard in the future. As it turns out I can increase my VMs memory for free so that’s no big deal. Still, I’m curious. What do people do with relays without much memory? Skip DirCache? Are there ways to reduce the memory footprint and still cache directory info? Thanks, —mkb

2 1

greyponyit.com free trial report
by Dmitrii Tcvetkov 29 Jul '18

29 Jul '18

Since 25.07.2018 I'm running Tor exit relay BBF17F784433635FA28E7E585D05FE3B15A31A6B on FreeBSD VPS. Although AS16276 is quite crowded, fact that IP address space is SWIPed to Conrad Rockenhaus means that I, as relay operator, don't need to deal with a torrent of abuse complaints because of usual exit activity. This allows to run relay with default exit policy. The VPS has OS FreeBSD 11.2 on KVM hypervisor (hypervisor maybe different for newer VPS though), storage is ZFS on GPT. The relay is too young to reach it's full potential, I may post updates in the future.

2 1

3-hourly pattern in network load of my Tor exit relay
by Toralf Förster 29 Jul '18

29 Jul '18

I do run 2 exits at the same hardware [1] and do use systat [2] to monitor system data. 2 questions: A) Since a while (months) I do observe a periodic pattern in the network load. An example is the graph (SVG format, made with [3]) of the data from yesterday. Is this typical? I did not observe such a pattern in the last few years. B) htop shows me, that the Tor exit relay listening on ORPort 443 consumes typically 30% more CPU time than the second Tor exit relay listing on ORport 9001. Boths however have nearly identical configs, bandwith weights and amount of connections (typical values are 4300 and 4500 respectively, 3700 and 3900 of them are connections to relays, the delta are exit connections). Does this explains the delta in CPU time? [1] https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/family:D11D11877769B9E617537B… [2] http://sebastien.godard.pagesperso-orange.fr/ [3] svg=/tmp/graph.svg; sadf -g -T ~/tmp/sa/sa28 -O skipempty,oneday -- -n ALL > $svg && konqueror $svg -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E

2 2

theonionbox
by TorGate 29 Jul '18

29 Jul '18

Hi i have found an issue on the freebsd startupscript. The theonionbox.py is in the /bin dir not in the theonionbox dir OLD: # That's out script command="${theonionbox_dir}/theonionbox.py --mode=service --config='${theonionbox_conf}'" start_cmd="/usr/sbin/daemon -u ${theonionbox_user} -p ${pidfile} ${command}" NEW: # That's out script command="${theonionbox_dir}/bin/theonionbox --mode=service --config='${theonionbox_conf}'" start_cmd="/usr/sbin/daemon -u ${theonionbox_user} -p ${pidfile} ${command}" Hope this help any Relayoperator :-) TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk

1 0

Nyx 2.0.4-4 on armhf - Python3 error
by Paul 28 Jul '18

28 Jul '18

I try to run Nyx on Linux 4.9.80-Re4son-v7+ #1 SMP Thu Apr 26 17:45:16 CDT 2018 armv7l getting following after start: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/nyx", line 11, in <module> load_entry_point('nyx==2.0.4', 'console_scripts', 'nyx')() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 476, in load_entry_point return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2700, in load_entry_point return ep.load() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2318, in load return self.resolve() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2324, in resolve module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nyx/__init__.py", line 46, in <module> import distutils.spawn ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.spawn' Could somebody show me a way to solve this and get Nyx running? Thanks Paul

5 5

torrelay on wan
by TorGate 28 Jul '18

28 Jul '18

Hi to all, is it a god ide to setup torrelays directly on WAN port ? Yes there are an firewall, but direkt in the torserver. So no extern firwall. I have freebsd TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk

2 2

YATR - Yet another tor relay
by zimmer linux 28 Jul '18

28 Jul '18

Hi, I too now have a shiny new exit relay, gifted by Conrad Rockenhaus for a one month trial on one of his freebsd virtual servers. I have zero background with freebd but use Mint linux on a daily basis. It's my second experience with running a relay, I ran a bridge for about a year on a home machine, but my first with an exit relay. Conrad was very helpful and supportive which enabled me to get the system and relay up and running much faster than without the personal support. It's early days yet and the server may take a while to pick up enough traffic to determine its ability. If you are wondering about trying Conrads offer, I say go ahead - you have nothing to lose except the time and input required to enable a relay. I am not an IT professional but it can be done without too much difficulty. If you have any questions about my experience to help you decide whether to run your own relay, please feel free to contact me off list. My relays Fingerprint 7D2A3BD99441CE8F104ADCB02590262ECDFEEF1C https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/7D2A3BD99441CE8F104ADCB02590… Thanks, Zim

1 0

Something strange noticed on tor metrics
by Keifer Bly 28 Jul '18

28 Jul '18

Hello, So today I w as checking my relay on tor metrics https://metrics.torproject.org/networksize.html I noticed something strange, according to the graph, the number of bridges seems to have suddenly completely dropped to zero (the bridges line just after “2018-07”) and now slowly climbing back up. I am wondering did something happen that knocked all of the bridges offline? It seemed strange so I just thought I would report. Thank you.

3 2

Relay operators meetup @ Onionspace, Berlin (in solidarity with Torservers)
by Vasilis 27 Jul '18

27 Jul '18

Dear Tor friends and relay operators, This Saturday (21/07) a Tor relay operators meetup will take place at Onionspace, Berlin. When: Sat., 21 July 2018, 13:00 Where: Gottschedstrasse 4, Entrance 4, 13357 Berlin (U Nauener Platz) Map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.54978/13.36991 Event link: https://blog.torproject.org/events/egypcio-vasilis-and-others-tor-friends-a… Hope to see many of you there. Cheers, ~Vasilis -- Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F 39FC 03EB B382 7470 5FBF 70B1 D126 0162 Pubkey: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5FBF70B1D1260162

5 6

Expanded Free Trial For Exit Relays
by Conrad Rockenhaus 27 Jul '18

27 Jul '18

Hello, One of the guys trying out my services suggested that I offer a free trial to those who would like to run Linux Tor Exit Relays or just plain relays or even bridges. So I am. I would prefer you would use FreeBSD (Still working on OpenBSD) but I'll offer Linux if it helps expand Tor. So, I'll offer this - 1 vCPU, 2GB RAM, 10GB HDD, 100mbit/unmetered bandwidth. Address space is SWIPed to me. I'm still automating things so I don't have a nice control panel online yet, should have it by this weekend though. If you're interested, please email me a public RSA key and I will create an instance for you. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com ------ Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today! https://www.greyponyit.com

1 0

Moving Tor Files - Backing Up Tor Software On Macos
by Keifer Bly 25 Jul '18

25 Jul '18

Hi, So I am trying to backup my relay software (torrc file, relay fingerprint, etc) using my file backup application. However, there is a problem. The macos operating system only allows accessing the /usr/local/, where tor is saved via the Go -> Go to folder option and does not allow it to be found via the finder no matter what, which my backup application (google backup and sync) requires. I tried running defaults write com.apple.Finder AppleShowAllFiles true as both the normal and sudo user and restarted the computer and finder, and this did nothing. Is it possible to move the tor files to a place where they would be accessible via the Finder or is there a known workaround for this? The software version is tor 0.3.3.9 on macos 10.13.6. Thanks very much.

2 1

How to restore fingerprint on updated RPI3
by Richard Johnston 24 Jul '18

24 Jul '18

I've run a relay for over a year and recently updated from an RPI2 to a RPI3. I've copied the torrc file and the node has the same IP Address and ports. What additional files need to be copied to get the fingerprint (et al) to match the original relay. The updated RPI3 shows up as a new relay and I would like to have it take over the old fingerprint. Any suggestions or procedures? Thanks in advance! -- Rich Johnston

2 2

Bridge relays should upgrade to use the new bridge authority
by Roger Dingledine 24 Jul '18

24 Jul '18

Hi folks! If you run a bridge relay, please upgrade -- so your bridge address can resume being given out to censored users, and so your stats can resume being included in the metrics pages. We just put out new releases (0.2.9.16, 0.3.2.11, 0.3.3.9, 0.3.4.5-rc) that retire the old bridge authority and start using a new one. The new bridge authority is "Serge", and it is operated by George from the Tor BSD Diversity project: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2018-July/000162.html If for whatever reason you can't upgrade yet, you can also manually switch to advertising your bridge descriptor to the new bridge authority by using this torrc line: AlternateBridgeAuthority Serge orport=9001 bridge 66.111.2.131:9030 BA44 A889 E64B 93FA A2B1 14E0 2C2A 279A 8555 C533 Thanks! --Roger

5 15

Temporarily shutting down public relay
by Shawn Webb 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Hey All, As an FYI, I'm temorarily shutting down the non-exit HardenedBSD-based relay I run at home (3CA2B91F2F2720202DD845E0E4C827E720CF5430) due to an upcoming extensive shoulder surgery my wife is having. I need to cut costs as she will be out of work for a year. My plan is to re-enable it once she's fully recovered. Thanks, -- Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD Tor-ified Signal: +1 443-546-8752 Tor+XMPP+OTR: lattera(a)is.a.hacker.sx GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE

1 0

FYI: Subpoena Received
by "IPfail (Tor Admin)" 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

FYI, I received a subpoena from a US based court to produce information about individual(s) who were using one of our exit nodes at a specific date/time. In the nearly 3 months that these exits have been in operation, this is the first subpoena and only the second complaint received. For purposes of documenting the approximate ratio of "complaints / traffic processed", these nodes have handled ~515TB and are using the recommended reduced exit policy. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

7 8

Bridges and MyFamily setting
by Cristian Consonni 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Hi, I am running a couple of relay nodes and now I would like to set a bridge relay. The `torrc` file says the following: --- ## Uncomment this if you run more than one Tor relay, and add the identity ## key fingerprint of each Tor relay you control, even if they're on ## different networks. You declare it here so Tor clients can avoid ## using more than one of your relays in a single circuit. See ## https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#MultipleRelays ## However, you should never include a bridge's fingerprint here, as it would ## break its concealability and potentially reveal its IP/TCP address. #MyFamily $keyid,$keyid,... --- I understand that I should not add the bridge fingerprint to the MyFamily setting of my other relays, but should I set MyFamily on my bridge (with the fingerprints of my other nodes)? I suppose that the logic of avoiding to have the same circuit through multiple relay controlled by the same operator is still valid, but I don't know if this could be a problem. C

2 3

[Software Announcement] FamilyGenerator: Tor MyFamily Generator
by Neel Chauhan 22 Jul '18

22 Jul '18

Hi tor-relays mailing list, I have created a tool called FamilyGenerator. FamilyGenerator is a tool to automatically construct a Tor MyFamily line based on Onionoo parameters. Why? If you run multiple relays, it can become hard to keep your MyFamily line updated if you add or remove relays. FamilyGenerator makes it easier (and automated if you use cron, or maybe without it in a future version if it ever comes). Does it integrate with Tor directly? As of now, no. If you want to automatically load FamilyGenerator outputs to Tor, you can: 1. Make sure all your relays has something in common in the Nickname or ContactInfo lines 2. Use a shell script to generate the MyFamily line with FamilyGenerator 3. Use a cron job to reload Tor after FamilyGenerator runs 4. Include the output in a Include line in your torrc Hopefully, a future version can avoid cron (that is, if it comes). FamilyGenerator is available on GitHub at: https://github.com/neelchauhan/FamilyGenerator You can install it from PyPI with: pip install FamilyGenerator A FreeBSD port is underway. For Debian users, sorry, but there's no Debian package in the pipeline as I don't use Debian. That's it. Thank You, Neel Chauhan

5 6

Trying to set up a relay at home, but get no connections
by Gunnar Wolf 21 Jul '18

21 Jul '18

Hello, I have set up a VM at my home server (via fiber DSL) to work as a Tor relay. I have set up port forwarding for ORport and DirPort (defaults, 9001 and 9030). The logs don't give me any useful information — or, possibly, I fail to grok anything useful ;-) The following happens every couple of hours: Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 17:59 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 2.71 MB and received 32.26 MB. Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 13.454%. TLS write overhead: 12% Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 14/14 NTor. Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] Since startup, we have initiated 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 21 v4 connections; and received 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 216 v4 connections. Jun 07 09:36:19.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 23:59 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 3.18 MB and received 42.36 MB. Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 13.454%. TLS write overhead: 14% Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 0/0 NTor. Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] Since startup, we have initiated 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 21 v4 connections; and received 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 284 v4 connections. Jun 07 15:36:19.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 5:59 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 3.66 MB and received 53.04 MB. Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 13.454%. TLS write overhead: 16% Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 0/0 NTor. Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] Since startup, we have initiated 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 21 v4 connections; and received 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 351 v4 connections. Jun 07 21:36:19.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. What should I look into? Thanks,

11 13

Question regarding ethical torrent blocking
by Conrad Rockenhaus 20 Jul '18

20 Jul '18

Hello, I was going to ask someone off-list, but the amount of abuse and DCMA complaints I have received now have been so much that I have decided that the best action to take is to set an exit policy. I run a couple of exit nodes and I have people apparently using them to torrent, which we ask people politely not to do through Tor....but the policy gets ignored I guess. Anyway, I'm receiving a sufficient amount of complaints to where I'm worried that my service may be terminated unless I take action, which would affect the greater good. So the question is - I run the default exit policy. I don't like being the arbiter of what goes through and what doesn't. Is it okay, ethically, from a free speech standpoint, to reach this point to where we say "we need to block this content from transversing my node" in response to legal complaints from others? Are others implementing these blocks and do you feel that such a block doesn't violate any ethical norm to provide uncensored access to the Internet? I'm just curious on what thoughts on this are. I know how to technically perform the block, I guess I feel like we're one of the last bastions against censorship on the Internet and people do torrent legitimate stuff. I don't consider pirating Fallout 4, The Elder Scrolls V, Sweetbitter, and The Evil Within 2 to be protected speech FYI... my worry is just blocking the legitimate uses of bittorrent. Thanks, Conrad Rockenhaus

8 10

Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?
by Conrad Rockenhaus 20 Jul '18

20 Jul '18

Howdy, So, anyway, I was previously more active, but I decided on a midlife career change and was on a training path to become a Physician Assistant. Then I was hit by a drunk driver. Now I had to drop out of the program for the next year at least, if at all, so I'm going back to working IT. That's the sob story. I like BSD, primarily FreeBSD (please flame me about how my relays aren't secure later :P) and like promoting the use of it. I have excess capacity on dedicated servers that I personally pay for that are used to host portions of a very popular Wiki based Satire/Dark Humor website. Some of that capacity is already going to Tor. On the servers that have address space SWIPed to me, I would like to resell that capacity specifically to host BSD based Tor relays, exits, bridges, and hidden services. Right now I'm working on infrastructure and a website and trying to somewhat automate things. The question I would like to ask, and honestly, I'm not trying to generate customers, I honestly believe that if a Linux user actually logs into a BSD box for the first time and sees the beauty and grace that the differences between BSD and Linux are that they would want to switch their own personal relay. I'm a firm believer of this. I know there's some hardcore Linux fans out there and that's fine, there's a legion of BSD fans too :). To the point - would it be fair to network stability to offer a week long free trial to run a tor instance, well, that is if that's what the user hopefully runs? Would such a model even have an affect on increasing the number of BSD instances we have on Tor presently? And again, per a suggestion in a previous email chain that I was involved in, I setup my ARIN and RIPE ids, and my providers have SWIPed the address spaces to me so any and all abuse complaints will be coming to me for the address spaces for now on. Thanks, Conrad

6 10

Updating relay using killall -hup command
by Keifer Bly 20 Jul '18

20 Jul '18

Hello, So recently I upgraded from tor 0.3.3.8 to tor 0.3.3.9, and used the killall -HUP command to restart the relay. However this did nothing, the relay consensus says I am still running tor 0.3.3.8 days later. Is there a way I can cause the upgrade to appear without completely restarting the relay? The OS is macos High Sierra 10.13.6. Thank you.

5 4

Re: [tor-relays] Discounts/Free Trials on BSD instances to promote BSD relays?
by Conrad Rockenhaus 19 Jul '18

19 Jul '18

Thank you for letting me know, I will look into this! I greatly appreciate the tip. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Alejandro Andreu <contact(a)alejandroandr.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > For automating the setup please consider using `gibson`[1], an effort made > by the folks at Emerald Onion to better manage a Tor relay through a set of > shell scripts. It's still in development, but just as you do, they run > everything in BSD boxes. > > Cheers! > > [1]: https://emeraldonion.org/introducing-gibson/ > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > On Jul 19, 2018, 09:34, Conrad Rockenhaus < conrad(a)rockenhaus.com> wrote: > > > Howdy, > > So, anyway, I was previously more active, but I decided on a midlife > career change and was on a training path to become a Physician > Assistant. Then I was hit by a drunk driver. Now I had to drop out of > the program for the next year at least, if at all, so I'm going back > to working IT. That's the sob story. > > I like BSD, primarily FreeBSD (please flame me about how my relays > aren't secure later :P) and like promoting the use of it. I have > excess capacity on dedicated servers that I personally pay for that > are used to host portions of a very popular Wiki based Satire/Dark > Humor website. Some of that capacity is already going to Tor. On the > servers that have address space SWIPed to me, I would like to resell > that capacity specifically to host BSD based Tor relays, exits, > bridges, and hidden services. Right now I'm working on infrastructure > and a website and trying to somewhat automate things. > > The question I would like to ask, and honestly, I'm not trying to > generate customers, I honestly believe that if a Linux user actually > logs into a BSD box for the first time and sees the beauty and grace > that the differences between BSD and Linux are that they would want to > switch their own personal relay. I'm a firm believer of this. I know > there's some hardcore Linux fans out there and that's fine, there's a > legion of BSD fans too :). > > To the point - would it be fair to network stability to offer a week > long free trial to run a tor instance, well, that is if that's what > the user hopefully runs? Would such a model even have an affect on > increasing the number of BSD instances we have on Tor presently? > > And again, per a suggestion in a previous email chain that I was > involved in, I setup my ARIN and RIPE ids, and my providers have > SWIPed the address spaces to me so any and all abuse complaints will > be coming to me for the address spaces for now on. > > Thanks, > > Conrad > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- Conrad Rockenhaus Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today! https://www.greyponyit.com

1 0