- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Hits againast GFC hex--string fingerprint in IPTables yesterday
by tor＠t-3.net 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

This has happened again, to the same node. The 4 hits came between approx. 16:39:57 and 16:40:27 EST on July 8. 4 offending IPs, one hit each: 1.50.251.122, 210.72.140.17, 119.4.5.55, 115.200.236.120 (they are all from China, per Apnic). They hit against the same hex-string rule as before.

1 0

Setting up relay on fedora
by Joker Hacker 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

I would like to setup tor relay on my fedora box it runs 16 to 18hrs a day.' Could you please point appropriate links or videos? - Thanks

2 1

Reliable way to gauge tor throttling?
by jason＠icetor.is 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

What would be a good method to determine if tor traffic is being throttled on a exit relay vs normal internet traffic? -J

2 1

CPU usage
by kingqueen 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

Hi, I'm running a Tor relay on a low cost dedicated server. The tor relay is named kingqueen and it's running on an Intel Atom N2700 dual core hyperthreaded CPU with 2gb of memory, in a data centre with a symmetric 100mbps connection. I have found as time goes on and usage of my relay increases (about 3 weeks now) that the Tor process is increasingly using more of the CPU. TOP shows Tor using over 100% of CPU and the load average is 2 or more. I use the dedi for other, less intensive things (OpenVPN, seedbox, also Owncloud though this falls over). I know that this is sub-optimal and ideally the dedi should be for the relay alone. I was wondering if the CPU usage is standard. I guess it could be, given it has decryption work to be done? Is it high? Is there anything I can do to lower it, other than rate limiting, which I don't want to do? Thank you

7 11

different torrc and fingerprint when rebooted
by Kali Tor 07 Jul '14

07 Jul '14

Hi all, When I installed tor for the first on an Ubuntu machine, ran it when logged in as normal user "tor" using the /etc/tor/torrc. However today I had to reboot the node and when it came back ps showed that it was using a different torrc /usr/sbin/tor --defaults-torrc /usr/share/tor/tor-service-defaults-torrc --hush IN addition, it seem to be running with a different/new fingerprint! The content of /usr/share/tor/tor-service-defaults-torrc is: DataDirectory /var/lib/tor PidFile /var/run/tor/tor.pid RunAsDaemon 1 User debian-tor ControlSocket /var/run/tor/control ControlSocketsGroupWritable 1 CookieAuthentication 1 CookieAuthFileGroupReadable 1 CookieAuthFile /var/run/tor/control.authcookie Log notice file /var/log/tor/log Could it be due to the different "User" that I have a new fingerprint? How do I make sure that the next time I reboot I use the correct torrc at /etc/tor/torrc and the correct fingerprint? Thanks, -kali-

1 1

Re: [tor-relays] Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes
by Sebastian Urbach 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

Dear Renke, Dear list-members, Yes, the TTTT project is alive. Thank you for asking and for your ongoing support. Yes the repo was updated but it is not ready for review yet. We are making changes for the next traceroute round and will ask for testing / testers as soon as it is ready. There is also being worked on a reverse traceroute and we had people at the last tor-dev meeting as well who are trying to figure out what step to do next. Regarding your comment on "Dynamic download of relay IPs". It's just downloading the current list of relay IP instead of using a static list. I don't see any harm in that as one of the participant in the past pointed out to use the latest IPs anyway. Theres a lot of work to do with limited human resources, please stay tuned. We will be back ;-) Hi Sebestian, > Just a quick update regarding the TTTT project. There are multiple GB's > of data to analyse and it is still being worked on. We are also working > on the public script(s) as well. is your project still on-going? I'm asking because your score board was not updated since May (except one test(?) upload in the phase foo-foo) and though the repository updates are interesting (dynamic download of relay ips) they were never approved for usage according to your installation notes. Renke ---------- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] UK Exit Node
by Thomas White 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael, First of all thank you for running an exit. I run a large series of exits in the Netherlands (https://globe.torproject.org/#/search/query=Chandler&filters[country]=nl) and I am a UK citizen. Having experienced many troubles, including server seizures, I decided to move the servers to a jurisdiction I am not living in or plan on living in as if there is legal trouble, you want to put up as many layers as protection as you can. That means even if my node in NL is seized and I could face a conviction (theoretically), because it is not illegal in the UK there is nothing that the government can do to force me over there under the concept of dual-criminality. Furthermore, running a Tor exit at a residential address is a very, very bad idea. I speak from experience here after encountering UK police already and their version of "knock and greet" is at 4am with the door taken off when they don't realise it is an exit node. You want to separate your traffic from that of your exits wherever possible because assuming you were asked in court if you ever used your own exit, it would be conceivable that ANY traffic from that exit server COULD have been yours if you've used or were on the same IP as it. This is of course not the case if you don't use the same IP/residence for your personal traffic. Also, on the topic of blacklisting IPs I find it a bad idea both morally and legally. Most believe morals would dictate blocking child porn/peer to peer is a good act, but this is the same guise governments have used to overextend their reach and so I don't block any traffic regardless of how questionable it is. The second reason is because of your legal liability in the UK as my solicitor has advised me; by blocking one set of IP's you are then accepting control to filter and moderate the traffic of your servers and therefore you don't have the same (full set of) safe-harbor provisions protecting you. It then becomes a trivial matter for law enforcement to come to you and order you block more sites without a court order. So overall, freedom of speech and the right to read are inherently against the idea of blocking content merely because the overwhelming majority of people believe it should be blocked. Freedom isn't free if it isn't totally free. - -Tom On 06/07/2014 08:51, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Michael Banks <c(a)starbs.net> > wrote: > >> The block lists are very limited, i.e P2P, lists of known >> blackhats/paedophiles, unallocated IP ranges and most >> importantly: government-owned address and anti-tor addresses > > > True, and I agree with your definition of malicious. > > My concern is that it is not either my place, or yours, to define > what is good or bad for the Random User to visit, _IF_ we are > offering a Tor relay. Our intentions in using this list, in > particular, are not relevant. After all, the Govt of China also > claims to be shielding its users from known bad guys. > > We are against such censorship, so why should we add our own > blocks, without warning, without anyway for the user to even know > we have such a block? > > > > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing > list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTuZIYAAoJEE2uQiaesOsL0ycQAKn1kFwjLMVAEvQ8v3hQUvOl dFzDhDLHR+SMUO+K6M8PvwsKHVB1og3jN4UN4hYvzGJl1qOsOhMGaWp6uvAxwJJJ JqjwyCnpHSTdYH2LKVjtKz3o/W00TDl8fJxXt5AfmDNUX9M/MsHieq7U6KPpKWyy K8U0xAxrLyFzaaFVVHjotZzRoCg67IMiLPXx/l6QurD+MCwNG7DWf+aMAgjxTQvJ 5OFQ938hmhAe7bXEkz0uc3zg5C36GOlif42Z7s3kqNMbP//yBBzSnV1dCtggGNqt F/IRMcK8TKkBecC5IlW3E3rHh1lcXH6VmkSKYC6/2KTkYlhdkROM8blGbt4P3kkf EHKmSa6kN0/iwUTdNsoY/duu2P96bWpZ69WFywf95WqRq6I/pwBMs2crN/QQWJ0t qu67OAIb4daBccBtf4XSq5S9W9KWej7cE6tdyoxBxBZlSTkmEljdhtLr5qkahtdL SEVHdY8ko4bFOBNMjZxGl8HKQbE2UlCiF3ErK8IyRGeLBwUlB29OlinaoJrewXud CHrkrNEXrDjePcUerz74Y7sRgtv2yOSKBhF4L/1kVV/govvysz3TuLQjmU9e1rQf alHm4wvRF18Lodlp+AnlKTlmVCP9cklTAsfNVb/TCOyjRmQewHXJd0JFdXpBQD8J x12SnIhToKOq0Q/iQOCF =doV0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

UK Exit Node
by Michael Banks 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

Any tips for UK Exit Node operators on a Residential ISP (BT)? Running a reduced exit policy, informed various teams at the ISP, running PeerGuardian on the server in question (blocking P2P/kiddyporn/hacking related IPs), have a hostname setup tor-relay.itschip.com, planning to leave the thing running 24/7 So far, it's been live on and off (ironing out issues) for the past few days and it's transferred well in excess of 300GB already. Looks like I'm one of the fastest Exit Nodes in the UK c:

6 11

Relay not making connections.
by Lluís 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

After reading the documentation and related FAQs I got my TOR relay installed and configured. It is listed in Atlas with the running, V2Dir and valid flags for more than 5 days. However, it receives almost no connections and the following notice appears frequently in the logs: [notice] No circuits are opened. Relaxed timeout for circuit 1331 (a Testing circuit 3-hop circuit in state doing handshakes with channel state open) to 60000ms. However, it appears the circuit has timed out anyway. 6 guards are live. [7 similar message(s) suppressed in last 3600 seconds] Can anyone point me over the right track ? Thanks, Lluis

2 2

Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes
by Sebastian Urbach 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

Dear list members, Just a quick update regarding the TTTT project. There are multiple GB's of data to analyse and it is still being worked on. We are also working on the public script(s) as well. Thanks for your ongoing support ! -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours Sebastian Urbach ---------------------------------------------- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ---------------------------------------------- Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790), Inventor, journalist, printer, diplomat and statesman

2 1

Relays or exits: which is needed?
by michaelball＠riseup.net 06 Jul '14

06 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I'm (hopefully) going to be running a few high-speed Tor servers sometime in the near future. Which type of Tor server (exits vs. relays) is needed the most right now? Thanks. Michael Ball @cryptostone - 0x0BEF5055 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTuMmTAAoJEPz+HqEL71BVSK4P/3QLZN0dXoMFgz4//pKzCEsl A0GW/DZEgmVwjo0GVmuvKnxcY+e8w53NQ7nD4XtIJw+KC/VgYnYomjA+JxI8UMWF HkQ3KHuX90YbUTPFD2aJmcj6ZUs99pHjgZblEzPzMxfPWgHXDe09bT7Z1TBGsJg0 JW1aQuo64tF1YPqhh98P7Qqn9mRU7MiWhzJjRUCPsj5CeQO1x/QcXBYP77UGtPe3 y6bpwberzbM6GgDjwdIb61LJScE/5bueApOEmvO6PJ3lMwwnJhrynExmE/nhR/lC bZ7YCwD4ICCuHIv9b0DqBMZDHb5mZuRtqDiUKzFwXX/M3Mj88RtBQemNZXTbvBp4 3cXejN5cPUAOgE2RC93bk40n7oYGkDtQDHu7i7Ed8K3r8yCGDbUt0KZzbHU3/EDQ v2AlFY/UqDR7XTjYMQAPcwG+iHbaHVClMRn9V512sBqMtjliV2ODbqEZYhpUfvTF jMUgNE9vFVmlmIGmxZAbeoktxM+8o3M/coyV5xz9GbkL6ChYFHX5h215LstXqtBk M3dW8GMV48Qsa1zSDGp1aMXTpXZ1gm6h/+SfokEhKYSqcJFbqQIYvjL+V5+DLlZ/ 9Njcg+bAirvQfLIEtSsNQNenmJG5juB/eUs6LZjCbuL2YGbRuVtPMSmmxORQMnXl f/CTUUssfdxwt05GG4cz =kLYH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: [tor-relays] New Tor node operator hibernation question
by pandemicrelay＠hushmail.com 05 Jul '14

05 Jul '14

Thank you for explaining hibernation better. Could there be any issue though since I 'forced' my relay out of this hibernation?

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] gazduire.ro
by icetor.is＠bitmessage.ro 05 Jul '14

05 Jul '14

On 7/5/2014 6:14 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:> Potentially interesting candidate for Tor exits. Someone on IRC said > they accepted exits. I didn't look at it in detail, it would be > interesting to know if they're just using Voxility or a different data > center/peering. > > https://www.gazduire.ro/ > https://www.voxility.com/ > > One of our bridge servers is located at m247, which are very friendly, > but I don't know if they allow exits, and they're a subsidiary of a UK > company: > > https://www.m247.ro/ > Hi, They do allow exits. 6C36F9ACBA57AC9C10DBC39D330CFA337522E72B The one and only in their network. They are nice and cooperative, never had a problem in > 3 months of continious usage. Only requiremenet is to block port TCP 25 outgoing (SMTP) to prevent email spam. No anti p2p filesharing policy. I don't think they are the same datacenter with Voxility. This is NETBRIDGE group, a group of comapnies running multiple very high profile websites here (like advertising websites and traffic measurement websites for .ro TLD). Their headoffice is in Bucharest, but the datacenter I think it's not in Bucharest, it is in other city (Suceava) some few hundreds KMs distance. Pros: - very srong uptime - good datacenter respecting highest industry's standards - nice ccoopeartion - vmware esxi virtualization - good network speed and quality - unmetered traffic Cons: - non-english version of their website (can be easily fixed); - only accepting visa/mastercard/paypal payments (maybe they can be convinced to go for BTC or WMZ if they are properly educated abut it); I have a good relation with them, Moritz, if you need specific details let me know and I'll update you here. ---Robert

1 0

gazduire.ro
by Moritz Bartl 05 Jul '14

05 Jul '14

Potentially interesting candidate for Tor exits. Someone on IRC said they accepted exits. I didn't look at it in detail, it would be interesting to know if they're just using Voxility or a different data center/peering. https://www.gazduire.ro/ https://www.voxility.com/ One of our bridge servers is located at m247, which are very friendly, but I don't know if they allow exits, and they're a subsidiary of a UK company: https://www.m247.ro/ -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torservers.net/

2 1

Why did my relay fall out of the consensus?
by Steve Snyder 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

On June 9th my relay, which was established about 20 months ago, fell out of the cached consensus. There are no errors in the logs, just notices that the relay is not in the cached consensus. Apart from upgrading to Tor v0.2.4.22 3 days earlier I haven't made any changes to the server. Anyone know what's going on here? https://exonerator.torproject.org/?targetaddr=&targetPort=&ip=5.9.191.52&ti… Thanks.

4 7

TAO on tor ops
by obx＠riseup.net 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

Do we have to assume to get targeted by TAO? Should we dump hardware ordered online?

2 1

NSA special treatment for Tor community
by no.thing_to-hide＠cryptopathie.eu 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Tor relays! If you did not subscribe to the talk-list, like me until this evening, you may have missed the latest surveillance news: The NSA targets directly the nine Tor directory servers https://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/nsa230_page-1.html The whole article is highly recommended to read. In what way normal, internal relays like mine are affected, is not further investigated. Best regards, and: Stay wiretapped! Anton - -- no.thing_to-hide at cryptopathie dot eu 0x30C3CDF0, RSA 2048, 24 Mar 2014 0FF8 A811 8857 1B7E 195B 649E CC26 E1A5 30C3 CDF0 Bitmessage (no metadata): BM-2cXixKZaqzJmTfz6ojiyLzmKg2JbzDnApC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTtdjNAAoJEMwm4aUww83wl1gH/0k7HpY1k+ZQVrwowyZfVRK+ EnIJLarO8sOTKIz9wFpu3ZTo8x8zDBlca05au6Wa/RuxHzf8W5yl+xgulBKKhQkR l+lqQvv0Me2DcwFTfUsBoYkNxaoaf0sF1yO2Bn1OF3iMQO+nyF5bMV6WLq722AoR jFsvvvVP6JIRd14HFVLKMrpOvqEPkJa0XTpvQGBUpKxJA/+/hj+Od+/RpwC2eyIM lAjrDxvDGFwIzCFn/vgBGMSvOUmm+LVnMR/uVmNCRAylmF25YtkP3t4tM7iPKMNg 1aQWCCnT6UusdkSzjs3AazcIA9797029wDTZ4B9dUljhB4i3DrcdgiX3txjqQQw= =zCCT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] New Tor node operator hibernation question
by Simon Hanna 03 Jul '14

03 Jul '14

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:34 AM, <pandemicrelay(a)hushmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am a new Tor relay operator, and have setup my first relay. It's been > running as a Tor middle relay for about 10 days now, and it's been running > solid. It has the stable, guard, fast, running, and valid flags. I have my > AccountingMax quota set to start at the first of each month at midnight. > However, just past midnight on 07-01 Tor said it was going to hibernate > until 07-05. This had me confused as I was only about half way through my > monthly quota setup in AccountingMax for June, and my hosting provider > reset the data on the first at midnight. I read the manual page about > AccountingMax again, and it appears this may have been normal behavior. > However before I read the manual page, I forced my relay to wake up out of > that hibernation. It appears to be operating normally right now. However, I > am wondering if this will cause any issues this month, or in future months? > Also, can someone explain if the hibernation of 5 days was normal behavior > to begin with. > > Thank you > As far as I know, tor startes at some random point so that not all nodes are up in the beginning of the month. If every node would do that, at the end of the month (or day if all have accounting per day) nobody would be able to use tor...

1 0

Obfs + Non-obfs bridges
by Daniel Thill 03 Jul '14

03 Jul '14

Can a single tor daemon instance provide both non-obfuscated and various other obfuscated transports? Right now, I have one instance that provides both obfs3 and scramblesuit. E.g., ServerTransportPlugin obfs3,scramblesuit exec /usr/local/bin/obfsproxy managed ServerTransportListenAddr obfs3 MYIP:PORT ServerTransportListenAddr scramblesuit MYIP:PORT2 I currently have another tor instance that runs a vanilla bridge configuration (no transports) on a different port. Is this really necessary? I couldn't find any documentation that address this. Can non-transport clients use any bridge by simply not negotiating a transport? There is a "none" pluggable transport type, but I figured that was for debugging purposes. Thanks, Dan

2 1

Running tor in VPS - keep away snooping eyes
by Kali Tor 03 Jul '14

03 Jul '14

All, Are there anything special that needs to be done to make sure that Tor nodes running inside VMs (VPS) is protected from snooping eyes? Since there is hardly any data at rest I am assuming not, but then, what do I know!:) -kali-

5 10

rejected hit from China
by Larry Brandt 03 Jul '14

03 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Today my router blocked two hits from Chinese server 218.77.79.43:59762 to my 68.66.154.214:21. I don't listen to port 21. I don't listen to 21. Should I take some action? Is this normal or academic or...? glowworm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTtMqbAAoJEGtidykNvjCmS+AH/353bFiZs8tJ+3iUwCPARUOj 9stR4/Hhq+vCk9NCnaYYJ/rQn3d0ZQW8SaZXmxzaqsTe+8eioy9n8sAELLEe9xMe VMenA5tYMkjIl08V7PW3v05S7Ap631BtTuO2TXeCickmz0frcDnEHVHAbfklFNLZ h67U/uAN2OYp1iu6++IBBoZOTpU6dAsDpRUGZofS9gWpNdqWB5En3hzaoCS2hEXT sG6N/mkExMBbmQri3pp02KIakOx8OzYi3Nl+ByxDHIqtmLEmu+3+clEEpYlSI6yN 3je75ek+e42HLVSepvLXhfA8rDQabl3TjGOq+VXdDZNwPWntBfpnfkwBhp+TnQk= =/PSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Why is UFW bllocking allowed TOR traffic?
by Jeff Odell 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

I was monitoring UFW today and noticed that it was periodically blocking allowed TOR traffic. any ideas why from those with more experience than I? toradmin@IrvineTorExit:~$ sudo ufw status Status: active To Action From -- ------ ---- 22 ALLOW Anywhere 9001/tcp ALLOW Anywhere 9030/tcp ALLOW Anywhere 80 ALLOW Anywhere 22 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6) 9001/tcp (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6) 9030/tcp (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6) 80 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6) toradmin@IrvineTorExit:~$ sudo tail -f /var/log/syslog | grep DPT=9001 Jun 22 15:38:12 IrvineTorExit kernel: [ 2159.246977] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=04:01:1b:5e:9a:01:28:8a:1c:64:cf:f0:08:00 SRC=92.108.200.200 DST=188.226.199.250 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=120 ID=10392 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=52000 DPT=9001 WINDOW=16652 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0 Jun 22 15:38:12 IrvineTorExit kernel: [ 2159.246988] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=04:01:1b:5e:9a:01:28:8a:1c:64:cf:f0:08:00 SRC=92.108.200.200 DST=188.226.199.250 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=120 ID=10396 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=52000 DPT=9001 WINDOW=16652 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0 Regards, Jeff

3 2

FYI: Tor-Ops Meeting in Vienna
by MacLemon 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hoi! Yes, this is a crosspost of tor-talk, please be gentle. There will be a Tor-ops meeting on Thursday, 2014-07-03, 19:00 at the Metalab[0] in Vienna/Austria. The meeting was planned way before the recent rulings in Austria became known but they will be discussed for certain. The actual purpose of the meeting shall be to finally found a Torservers.at organisation (German word: Verein) in Austria that works on running nodes in the public interest as well as exchange know-how and best practice on running relays, bridges and exits. So in case you're in Vienna, please join! Best regards MacLemon [0]: http://metalab.at/wiki/Lage "How to get to Metalab"

4 4

Bandwidth usage for an established relay node
by Kali Tor 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hi all, Curious as to how much bandwidth a stable, well established relay node will chew through in a month on an average? Anyone has any figures? -kali-

3 3

optimize performance of a relay running on a VM
by s7r 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have multiple relays running on the following systems: - - vmware vsphere virtualization technology - - 100 mbps port - - 1GB dedicated RAM - - 2.6 Ghz 1 core CPU dedicated - - OS: FreeBSD 10.0 Release amd64 or Debian Stable - - DO NOT KNOW IF I HAVE AES-NI SUPPORT OR HOW TO ACTIVATE IT (?) Currently atlas shows 3-4-5 MB/s advertised bandwidth for these relays. Arm shows between 600 and 1200 concurrent circuits (total of inbound, outbound and exit) and average traffic consumption is 5-6 TB per month (total both download and upload). I think this can be improved, but how? The servers have only purpose Tor, there is nothing else running on them and there is no bandwidth cap or throttling. Suggestions? Thanks in advance. - -- s7r PGP Fingerprint: 7C36 9232 5ABD FB0B 3021 03F1 837F A52C 8126 5B11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTswH9AAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRtTMH/jFV2FdfSksYNalSn9fmHcRk sKoWfNuRL/FQAQ1R0faN0F3lemOfDq80vosmd95h5EIZG7UmmN/xs9s8K9PQAzxf j3XHwCtYVkKkEA1djdAbFUB5s3WN6ieNm0qnnqZeBk16A9vJeRI2wkYFPRaDn6c5 n9u+p5QUjRmBKMkY/TOZ12TWSdeD683SoGdx4O5FeP90B+Q61SFgDtkvX6wtWKZr flWM/Bf0gpQL6Qowl9E49J5dJj+RgSYqPZ943x37nutBYzGmn0pbqXU1ulg0WFuz 3tu4bjwLITg1BB64jnF9hwn91pnd8ECay8OMqnZxbI1QycvPTPcNkwkasqARfTs= =MJBs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4