July 2018 - tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Do not be intimidated "Zwiebelfreunde" and all others
by onion 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

out of German newspaper taz: https://www.taz.de/Kommentar-Razzien-bei-Netzaktivisten/!5515912/ https://www.taz.de/Kommentar-Razzien-bei-Netzaktivisten/%215515912/

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 89, Issue 49
by dave levi 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

first, Thank you all for you answers and help. let me make it a bit harder. now, im running a relay which is Guard and Exit relays. i have defined in my relay(the server that's running the relay in /torrc file) to be "AllowSingleHopExits 1" and set in my computer that running the TOR(in /torrc file) with the 1(one) hop to: "ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0" and "AllowSingleHopCircuits 1" so now every thing needs to be ok right? but, still its not working On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:34 PM, <tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org> wrote: > Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tor-relays-owner(a)lists.torproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? (dave levi) > 2. Re: Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? (Logforme) > 3. Re: Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? (Matt Traudt) > 4. Re: Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? (Nagaev Boris) > 5. Re: Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? > (Roger Dingledine) > 6. Re: Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? (Matt Traudt) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:16:46 +0300 > From: dave levi <levi72827(a)gmail.com> > To: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > Subject: [tor-relays] Is Tor-network protected from using one hop? > Message-ID: > <CAJUku5hQa5JCk1UCn_CynyVG=kxhXkQpC0-ApW=k7vJxPrTM5g@ > mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the > source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it work's > fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only 2 hop's its still > works great. but, when i'm setting only 1 hop, i can open the Tor-browser > but i can't use it(Tor-browser) to visit site(regular site or onion site > too). so im thinking maybe the Tor-network have protected from users who > are using 1 hop? >

1 0

OutboundBindAddressExit
by Paul Templeton 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

Can you only bind one address or is there a way to use multiple? P 609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378

2 4

A general question for relay operators
by George 04 Jul '18

04 Jul '18

Greetings relay operators. A question that came up offline for relay operators can be summed up in one sentence, paraphrased from flexlibris: as a relay operator, what "things" do you wish you knew before you started running a relay? I'm really curious, in particular, to hear from those relay operators who are less connected to others, and are maybe more isolated physically from the community. In the long-ago past, many of us ran exit nodes without giving it much thought or preparation leading to ISP issues, but that seems less common today. For others, there might be a learning curve in keeping a network service up with decent uptime, while updating the relevant ports and operating system. There's no irrelevant answers to this, including more boring issues such as paying for the relay, choosing a provider or experiences as a (conscious) exit node operator. Bonus point for showing relation between your total costs per 1Mbps. Not only should this discussion be useful on list, but it might provide more content for the relay operator guide. g -- 34A6 0A1F F8EF B465 866F F0C5 5D92 1FD1 ECF6 1682

9 15

Coordinated raids of Zwiebelfreunde at various locations in Germany
by nusenu 04 Jul '18

04 Jul '18

https://blog.torservers.net/20180704/coordinated-raids-of-zwiebelfreunde-at… https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2018/hausdurchsuchungen-bei-vereinsvorstanden… "The board members of the association are not considered suspects but witnesses in the ongoing investigation." "Just to recap: The mere presence of an e-mail address at a large free provider on a website has caused law enforcement authorities to deduce that a German association that helps raise funds for this provider must be connected to this website somehow."

5 5

DSL interruption
by Paul 04 Jul '18

04 Jul '18

^ r | rt rt | rt rt | rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt rt rt rt | rt rt rt rt rt rt rt -+---------------------------------------------------------------------------> | 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 h rx (MiB) tx (MiB) h rx (MiB) tx (MiB) h rx (MiB) tx (MiB) 12 11.14 14.76 20 666.90 679.48 04 11.68 15.05 13 98.65 102.77 21 27.54 29.01 05 22.50 22.41 14 961.83 954.33 22 49.58 51.97 06 14.50 17.09 15 1028.29 1021.80 23 50.87 51.47 07 11.75 15.13 16 1529.16 1520.73 00 28.72 29.68 08 10.71 13.05 17 1779.50 1768.45 01 16.91 19.62 09 32.82 14.84 18 2477.60 2456.01 02 10.76 14.93 10 13.86 15.48 19 2380.83 2358.08 03 10.06 12.70 11 1.57 2.32 From time to time I do get DSL interruptions which look like above on the traffic on one of my smaller relays. This usually last until I restart the machine manually. Anybody having a good quick idea, script to solve this and restart automatically when DSL is up again? Its on Raspian latest.. Thanks and regards Paul

2 1

killall -hup command
by Keifer Bly 04 Jul '18

04 Jul '18

Hello, So recently I rebooted my relay using the killall tor -hup command (while I was trying to mae some changes to my torrc file). My relays uptime was not changed at all by this, having a current uptime of about 6 days. However, I noticed today at http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=db1af6477bb276b6ea5e7213… My relay lost the stable flag (which it had had for the last about two months). I know not to worry about exactly what flags I have all the time, but it raises the question of what eactly the killall -hup command does? Thanks.

4 5

Turning down my relay from DigitalOcean
by Guillermo Narvaez 03 Jul '18

03 Jul '18

Hello everyone, Sadly I'm stoping the tor daemon in my relay due high cost of bandwidth ($100), in the meantime I start to search an optional hosting. My apologies! -Guillermo

10 11

Contact info obfscation
by Keifer Bly 02 Jul '18

02 Jul '18

Hello, I am aware that email addresses used in the “ContactInfo: “ in a relay operator’s torrc file is publicly listed on the tor relay. However, what I am wondering, is there a way to obfuscate the email address on http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=db1af6477bb276b6ea5e7213… to appear as “k—f---b--(a)g-ail.xn--com-9o0a or something of the sorts, while keeping the real email address readable for tor cloud to send mail to? It seems like obfuscating the email address in the torrc file would cause it to become unreadable to the tor project as well. Thank you.

10 23

Problem implementing IPv6 and NYX info
by arisbe 01 Jul '18

01 Jul '18

This year I've modified most of my exit relays to function as IPv6 in/out. The process was easy with the exception of two [0], [1]. I requested and received an IPv6 address, netmask and gateway from these ISPs. I then modified my /etc/network/interfaces file as follows leaving the IPv4 lines in tack: iface eth0 IPv6 static address 2a06:1700:0:1b:: netmask 64 gateway 2a06:1700:0:1b::1 ip addr shows the IPv6 address as global. I added a single line to torrc following the IPv4 line: ORPort 9001 ORPort [2a06:1700:0:1b::1]:9001 After a restart, both relays ramped up to a volume of connections where I was comfortable that the changes were good. Visiting them 12 hours later I find connections in the few hundred and no flags. About half of the connections were from non-Tor servers. The Tor daemon was running and had a PID. Logs showed the relay operational and nothing peculiar. Tor metrics shows the relay as down. I've commented out the IPv6 ORPort line to get both of these exits going again. The procedure I outlined has worked four other times for me. So what gives? Can anyone steer me toward the problem? And, finally, a quick question: Does NYX display incoming and outgoing IPv6 relay information? I assume ARM does not. Arisbe [0] [4061C553CA88021B8302F0814365070AAE617270] [1] [9B31F1F1C1554F9FFB3455911F82E818EF7C7883]

5 5