- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Release 0.3.2.9 "expert bundle" for Win x64 available?
by Peter Ott 14 Jan '18

14 Jan '18

0 *H÷ 010 +0 *H÷ $ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007B_01D38D3C.21C81030" This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007B_01D38D3C.21C81030 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, is there already a built for the new stable 0.3.2.9 "expert bundle" Win x64 available or any idea when it will be distributed? Thanks in advance Peter ------=_NextPart_000_007B_01D38D3C.21C81030 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta = http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 = (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=3DDE = link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1><p = class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB>Hi,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB>is there already a built for the = new stable 0.3.2.9  “expert bundle” Win x64 available = or any idea when it will be distributed?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB>Thanks in = advance<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span = lang=3DEN-GB>Peter<o:p></o:p></span></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html> ------=_NextPart_000_007B_01D38D3C.21C81030-- Ö00 /\ß8ígPGüóÛP00 *H÷ 0u10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority1#0!UStartCom Class 1 Client CA0 161125184133Z 200225184133Z0h1&0$U For login authentication only10Upeter.ott(a)df7fe.de1!0 *H÷ peter.ott@df7fe.de0"0 *H÷ 0 ÅkìŽLÒõŽxÿKAŸ€à3¬×Œ£œ±WëØ¯6êæJ±²Òè þm1ðv¥éÛW~&$ÄûÂ#Òl®Ôæ2oÀDj*Ð ÜÑDbU÷ ÔäŸ4XÜMÏâBÍ¥ýñõ³ÖÂ(6ÄÕÿïA3TÖYnùÎ2Á%ø©éRèA¢|áÀñ»°*ó^Ø-gÒ~_;Ê&Çç>ç5â+P|râ "AÅÀõÄà%H_×qÀßª±Ð í»Ùœ dò Cb^XÊø?và·Iè¡ú.Nç.ýGu.&£¶0²0Uÿ°0U%0++0 U00Ue)$vg È«ø/úœé[Áêq¬0U#0$l9aŸI·F+É(µ'Hmh0o+c0a0$+0http://ocsp.startssl.com09+0-http…10/0- + )'http://crl.startssl.com/sca-client1.crl0U0peter.ott(a)df7fe.de0#U0http://www.startssl.com/0GU @0>0<+µ70-0++https://www.startssl.com/policy0 *H÷ 7^dîRÑ£€üjÍï·Æ:w«µkÏ-ÇL ,Äù9¿iÒ*U²*Ðo'æÀiOËV_ñº¿ŠŸ4áãÂ/WÁ²³ïþ€oÁ»6rÕbùÖøCf/oÐbïS7ÿ+ËFÚÆ`Î7Ò¡Vyfß¡šVß>ÚLC'íCøÍS4ôÉÝ%ê÷5o¿1¶EÓ®íðøéŽX)¢úO¶Ÿ}W«wïwTÈN.4ÀªYïT %tÒqËC_ü€F ·ÛFcKÒÇÈN}Ò¶'+=±ÂH'Rk(å0â0Ê k§} ×ÖQ ùYäçŽá0 *H÷ 0}10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1+0)U"Secure Digital Certificate Signing1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority0 151216010005Z 301216010005Z0u10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority1#0!UStartCom Class 1 Client CA0"0 *H÷ 0 œ}Ú÷Ã¢}ö[ýÛ[_®uÀµ¯$¬»WyØ5ì |Ì Ðvün£qY§)\aL$dõÑY¢ÄG|B"äQûÇ€ÿÄ©æVDº#'ŒÁFØÌËÎ ék9O_]*Ïz÷_kÏU.u3µör #œ:Úáì²C<ožÆg íT)Ké ÉXah8ËvÆ[²\KqídlOÁ)3+u7åJ5Ù"Á;[ÈvfÊL/"2Ï©²Jï#ð¡4×¬[¡UúÎ ÏTŒŠB, aŽË²ø¶¡a®7Há¯µ<ùÒöÞ=q³£d0`0Uÿ0U%0++0Uÿ0ÿ02U+0)0' % #!http://crl.startssl.com/sfsca.crl0f+Z0X0$+0http://ocsp.startssl.com00+0$http://aia.startssl.com/certs/ca.crt0U$l9aŸI·F+É(µ'Hmh0U#0Nï€@[¥i0Ê4hCÐA®ò0?U 80604U 0,0*+http://www.startssl.com/policy0 *H÷ ã÷ì[á#'#œ4ðpnRÛ¡ØÐN®â`ì]K"#Hÿì*ß·Ô¹£Ï;UªÊA8òæìÒÍeg{°ozmY¥Á³E60æA·ß)wXRK¡6»c^ï-A¬œëlæãÈéà^ñŠ²k[ž³³':ŽG=¹á;¿oLv¿{µ$Bò³5ê;8Èb,ZPŒ4Âþ{o[-§à»¢jå õå×m)ê¯Â[ë[þ«§Øý¢îüæ4 s.cà|ÀÒŽ¢v¡YLJ<À¡|ÖÉÓ¯gu±0ÓjéD2 @¶hÓl+:ÁjŸ\ìze_Öa@¢ìHyMŒHãIÀNxp£®K?ä% ã€ºRC£÷×:=£?^ÐØ&ÿµ×ë7³ï¬mÂŽ)õÝ«AŒ2;E~ VœB²1ÌÍÌ$ÜEvcKjØ(Oæìo«ÙŸU`"$©Òa¥Ð;Ò¡×âjœ0Îý$&<ÂÐ$Û+Í/Áxjz°ùbþ,7}W*ð1ÒÜºÃûtŠDv#Õ8ÌK %^ÀÎÒà¥£Pò>²é/iÓ?)yRÚuQá©ÿg^¢Æz÷çÅ`~ŒsPï9££0É0± 0 *H÷ 0}10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1+0)U"Secure Digital Certificate Signing1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority0 060917194636Z 360917194636Z0}10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1+0)U"Secure Digital Certificate Signing1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority0"0 *H÷ 0 ÁÛ ŒlF|x{µ3òrbÖÁ6 "$^ÎéwòC ¢d€Ì6ø8æ#ðnm±<Ýr£¡Ó=Ž3+Ó/¯þê°AYg¶Ä} tÖyL7zß9RY÷ôFC€ÒÒÃqóub4º,îí4ÐÇÍR=º3ÖÝMÞ;JKÂ&/úµr5wÊ<]æÊá&6v\Ût%þíµ ÝxÊ-0-ryúFÖ*š¹Š«IåòïÝä cSb©:ÌµfŠÂktä+áv>ŽmØöDásb;ÄŸ SV%lQ ÷ª«Ê¿výmóÛ¿=fŒVª¯H:Kß§XPÙ8u©[êCÿëèlMp[)eÝª]Ì¯1ìëÒèê{æn÷'fH×nBã?Þ!>{á pûcªšlTŽ\%zÉ¢ÉŠ»,~^MXnî Æ2ÿüôúÍnè6IŸHiÂM²iÁ Öúy"H¿º{iøpÇúz7ØØ ÒvOWÿ·ãÒÝïÂ`·g:ÝþªðÔr"ÎÆ¶ø¯ šÙûÆ¶µ\R<¶*s ³`òz/Û£nÿ&0õÝW¶=³¯+Å·vð¥Ö+*röã3] Kß»tRK£R0N0U0ÿ0U®0UNï€@[¥i0Ê4hCÐA®ò0dU]0[0, * (&http://cert.startcom.org/sfsca-crl.crl0+ ) '%http://crl.startcom.org/sfsca-crl.crl0]U T0P0L+µ70;0/+#http://cert.startcom.org/policy.pdf05+)http://cert.startcom.org/intermediate.pdf0Ð+0Ã0' Start Commercial (StartCom) Ltd.0Limited Liability, read the section *Legal Limitations* of the StartCom Certification Authority Policy available at http://cert.startcom.org/policy.pdf0 `HøB08 `HøB +)StartCom Free SSL Certification Authority0 *H÷ lôf4õÐ^} ìÚN8^ßŠ%K2Áè;ñ=ÝD [I)Ëf·±÷% <áÝ6+K»hÓ9f= &Çò9Q«{~ÕÎZäâWpiù^XŠ ßE8 ^WöbÇzæŒµòô©)ø²ãn(DÃÞ8©<¬CMdEÎÝ(©\òs{øè«±ó.\dns1:žŒ³ä}Q;ôMf{<íÓóePõ Ðu/¯ðêCøiyÄCFrãd6¯÷%8w~Ãkj¹ÃËDK¬xçÇ,KDÈ4R'Í ]ÁÕxòS2ÝfuÙµh(ûa.Ÿš8À¥gd./©pÇ|eõCT«Ý¥9`À4Ép,£õH{œ~k·ô";®øü*ÊúR ï¯KUëÁµð"¬4N&"¡,uJ·å}×ždÀ6ÒÉ/# Á;sI£jWåÖxÅCcãMàw-áeriG æV$û¿y©X.¹Ä ~ºm>²êJ9ØÐ+õ¿ìu¿Å ÜU7âû7Cb ÊçVKeêþlÁ$$¡4ëÿ"®}?ñeQ Š0j³ô ürè^1ä0à00u10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority1#0!UStartCom Class 1 Client CA/\ß8ígPGüóÛP00 + /0 *H÷ 1 *H÷ 0 *H÷ 1 180114123232Z0# *H÷ 1xûGM° 7ªÏc¶ÊWµÁ0 *H÷ 100 `He*0 `He0 *H÷ 0 `He0*H÷ 0 *H÷ @0+0 `He0 `He0 `He0 +7100u10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority1#0!UStartCom Class 1 Client CA/\ß8ígPGüóÛP00*H÷ 1 0u10 UIL10U StartCom Ltd.1)0'U StartCom Certification Authority1#0!UStartCom Class 1 Client CA/\ß8ígPGüóÛP00 *H÷ `<NILG8qŸA}QAºÓ@ZR\Hx¬ âMÞëßÅQ>QhšŽö¶ŠB²¢]û§×ÎÍ »)ÆOCJÉvÄ q4&kjó&ÈÓ®D÷£2Q:,Šáµ~ªm&=jñž8GDÑÿÙÀ_×R/É uiÞì èÖ×·W8švðÅŽA¥çÉ% :3à¢ysßÞ,¿Ô+``ôµGI':ØŠ[êð3õ5'ÛK+TkîÝÔXÐ M'&»ëyéyÚ;)]\ødg*Ú.óGäèu¿ôciÓ

2 1

Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit
by TorGate 14 Jan '18

14 Jan '18

Hi to all, is this a problem :-) [WARN] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit with purpose Acting as rendevous (pending) [9 duplicates hidden] 18:34: and [WARN] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit with purpose Acting as rendevous (pending) [13 duplicates TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk

2 1

AS "sprint S.A."
by nusenu 14 Jan '18

14 Jan '18

I'm proposing to remove these 5 exit relays as per the new contactInfo/MyFamily requirements, most of them signed up at the same time, use the same tor version and have the same exit policy. (I'm CC'ing tor-relays so the operator has a chance to see and react to this email as well) +---------------------+------------------------------------------+-------------+----------+---------+---------+ | first_seen | fingerprint | tor_version | nickname | or_port | contact | +---------------------+------------------------------------------+-------------+----------+---------+---------+ | 2018-01-09 13:00:00 | AC3F8121574050C595FED8ED44CEA2DCD75F9BAF | 0.2.4.29 | lacheses | 9001 | NULL | | 2018-01-13 20:00:00 | 9A90F846871641CB97C70B948963FCA3F7486E5A | 0.2.4.29 | Glaucus | 9001 | NULL | | 2018-01-13 20:00:00 | AF2B2D9A7C33E23C02A3AEA917DDC86663EBEF2A | 0.2.4.29 | Hemera | 9001 | NULL | | 2018-01-13 20:00:00 | E92D860BE6E3460ECB02E37A11DDEF87461EE08B | 0.2.4.29 | Demeter | 9001 | NULL | | 2018-01-13 21:00:00 | 0AE3AC492B709AA851488D01B1AD1EDFC040947F | 0.2.4.29 | Enyo | 9001 | NULL | +---------------------+------------------------------------------+-------------+----------+---------+---------+ ornetradar(a)riseup.net: > 2018-01-13 > > | Up | Ext | JoinTime | IP | CC | ORp | Dirp | Version | Contact | Nickname | eFamMembers | > |------+-------+------------+----------------+------+-------+--------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------------| > | 1 | 1 | 19:43:55 | 195.22.125.135 | pl | 9001 | 0 | 0.2.4.29 | None | Demeter | 1 | > | 1 | 1 | 19:44:06 | 195.22.125.141 | pl | 9001 | 0 | 0.2.4.29 | None | Glaucus | 1 | > | 1 | 1 | 19:44:10 | 195.22.125.144 | pl | 9001 | 0 | 0.2.4.29 | None | Hemera | 1 | > | 1 | 1 | 19:45:23 | 195.22.125.137 | pl | 9001 | 0 | 0.2.4.29 | None | Enyo | 1 | > > https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetRadar/2018/01/13/a2 -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_

1 0

Question: systematic hacking on my social media accounts
by Paul Templeton 14 Jan '18

14 Jan '18

Hi all, Just wondering if anyone else has had this problem over the last week. I have had attempts (one successful) on my social media accounts. Just found it strange that it was more than one. They got into my Facebook page (Haven't used it for years) - Seems that they got access via really old personal questions that family have provided them via their online posts - ie happy birthday now that you are this old... and hows your dog m#### doing and my mum listing her maiden name etc. I can't get it through to people to stop them from having public profiles... SIGH. Mean while they have to put up with girly pics or unfriend me as i'm not interested in the account. A lesson for all. Paul 609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378

2 1

which countries in the world are missing a Tor Relay?
by Fabio Pietrosanti - Lists 13 Jan '18

13 Jan '18

I was wondering which countries in the world are missing a Tor Relay? It would be nice to have a small project reporting which countries are still missing Tor relays, to invite people to find a way to run at least one there, being exotic places or just unusual places! Fabio

6 5

request for comments: The Tor Relay Guide (Draft)
by nusenu 12 Jan '18

12 Jan '18

The #Tor relay documentation on www.torproject.org has shown its age and some of us have been working on writing something new, currently it lives on trac but will live on a website eventually. The Tor Relay Guide https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide It also features instructions to setup automatic package updates for multiple Linux distributions. I'd like to get your feedback! The preferred location is via email or on the trac ticket: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24497 thanks, nusenu -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_

4 6

denetron.com Tor Relays MyFamily Configuration
by nusenu 12 Jan '18

12 Jan '18

Hello, thanks for running Tor relays! Please do not forget to set your "MyFamily" configuration parameter on all your relays, so Tor clients are not at risk of using your relays in multiple positions in a single circuit. Some more background: https://hackernoon.com/some-tor-relays-you-might-want-to-avoid-5901597ad821 https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/endtoend-correlation-groups Let us know if you need any help with this. thanks, nusenu -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_

1 0

Faravahar - Scheduled Maintenance - Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 18:00:00 UTC to 22:00 UTC
by Sina Rabbani 11 Jan '18

11 Jan '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Scheduled Maintenance Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 18:00:00 UTC to 22:00 UTC Dear Tor Network, I am upgrading/replacing the hardware for Faravahar, and would like to announce a maintenance window: Scheduled Start: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 18:00:00 Scheduled End: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 22:00:00 During this event the server will be out of service and unavailable. I will reply to this email with updates when the work begins and upon completion. All the best, Sina -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaVVAaAAoJEMeylP64yITyeR8P/jr13qhdtK/zWja9Ybp6NbBq +jWBSes/CGxLGtIRs/DIXF6jlhaPfM+yO/bhQ3MJvpa5ls50EPQhzEuUnbM3Zxtv 586cgclupXtDXyu8n7wbJRelmbRZ7Ef7mQDc9IaNU3J4UgzsS0bNghIKO1gfq2rc HK97JIqnGyPDjzrPvFatzdKWAkmIk6TR4c6zuCcHZqNChQxSkOge0acOo69fusL/ 4TQr69GOTklV6N3YVvo8OLzUlWNGGj1CHVN6nJD11NwyZFrQ6kC1PfaPcUNs0CUB ecge5FBXXFb1gDA9gr2THAdw++bmOZwaKKgqgyyU6qFhQkOHAnHhTh5Ef0YBIwXg l4m4FW+u91yfv2rHaXF2K4DgjhgKkjfmmsmT2NIIE7uCxtr8otmJQSyy6W8awn2Y ymoMUfCbqUD3QNUHU90PJmTSlzK2+Asp2cd8PdiIILXsmwVq+JBt09MnT/lDO/UH kxnNTK7VnVChpef40z1JyZKyGOeXc/a4O5VvyfvYDohe9sBiiINdfGz7RA6+BOsE ChUp8PiGimyWZpHVO7ccZyWya3mTT43HRJjr3U0LoZNBb1S/CwYre1B/7e2M3i/D WYOQc/ubTuw6ZOJ79QMxPdUR76WLsJi/ULZ1iqEwdyagg/jnUsDNMRYp4da12kij iESAh7F4Tom7zeh2xHh1 =qe70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 2

Failing because we have 1354 connections already.Please read doc/TUNING for guidance.
by rush23＠gmx.net 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

2 1

Nyx reported speed
by John D. McDonnell 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

I'm not sure if reporting is off or something isn't configured right or whatever it could be, but when running nyx, it is telling me that the measured rate is 229.0 B/s which to me, sounds ridiculously slow. Where is it getting the measured rate from? Is it a calculation on how much data is passing in a given time or some sort of speed test from another relay or where? While I've used Tor off and on for several years, I never ran a relay until now and I'm still not certain on several aspects, though I keep digging to make sure I can supply the best exit relays I can. (I currently host 2 exit relays and hope to bring up 3 more in the near future if I can find hardware to run them on. Though I may make one a bridge.) I have some spare internet connections that are provided to us that are 25/5 connections. I configured torrc with a 500KB/s limit with 600KB/s bursting as this should work nicely to use ~4Mbps of the 5Mbps that the connection supports and allows me some bandwidth to be able to connect to the machines for monitoring and troubleshooting as well as more than enough bandwidth for downloading updates and such. The line in nyx that I'm referring to is: Bandwidth (limit: 500 KB/s, burst: 600 KB/s, measured: 229.0 B/s): Where is it getting that 229.0 B/s rate and is there anything I can do to get it closer to the 500KB/s I am trying to share. Granted, I am using a Linksys e1200 and Belkin something-or-other that I can't remember off the top of my head running DD-WRT as routers in front of the servers. (I've pondered removing the router and just connecting the server directly to the internet and relying on pf for my firewalling, but I can't do that at the one location as I also have a couple other things connected to it. Both routers are higher end consumer routers with 32MB of RAM and has 32768 for maximum ports. (Currently just under 3000 active IP connections as I'm typing this e-mail.) I might just try this on my one exit to see if this is the bottleneck I'm hitting or if there's something else affecting it. When I had first put this in place, I was using an older Netgear ProVPN router of some sort, but I swapped it out due to it flagging NTP traffic as unknown even though my server was initiating the NTP requests. But I was maintaining 200KB/s+ connections fairly consistently. It now ranges all over the place and I'm not sure if that's an issue on my end or just part of the lifecycle of a relay. I just recently rebooted the machine this happened to pop up in the nyx log window as I was looking at this: 12:33:09 [NOTICE] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 4 days 23:59 hours, with 1928 circuits open. I've sent 37.89 GB and received 37.00 GB. To me, that seems a too low, but I've not sat down to do the math and maybe that's a good statistic for 5 days at 4Mbps. I'd appreciate any tips and pointers you can send my way. And if the consumer routers are the issue, I can move my one exit relay to one of the other connections I have and not use it at the location (or just run one that's slower) where I do use this backup internet connection. (It's handy to have a network that's not part of our internal network for testing.) Thanks for sticking with me through this whole e-mail and I apologize for rambling and jumping around a bit. I'm sure I left out some stuff and didn't clarify something else or something wasn't clear, so if you need more information, just ask. Thank you, John Penn Cambria School District This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately via email and delete this email along with any attachments from your system. Any unauthorized or improper disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail and attached documents is strictly prohibited. The views and opinions of this email or attachments are reflections of the author and are not necessarily the views and opinions of Penn Cambria School District. We do not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage from the receipt of this email, its use, or for any errors or omissions. www.pcam.org<http://www.pcam.org>

3 8