- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

tor26 dir auth differences
by nusenu 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

consensus-health (https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-consensus-health) wrote: > WARNING: The following authorities are missing from the consensus: tor26, dizum > NOTICE: tor26 had 6216 Guard flags in its vote but the consensus had 1855 > NOTICE: tor26 had 0 Exit flags in its vote but the consensus had 777 > NOTICE: tor26 had 7086 Stable flags in its vote but the consensus had 4541 interesting -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_

1 0

memory requirements
by notatorserver 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Hi, I have just setup a tor-relay and I am wondering if the resource requirements are still current: "A non-exit relay faster than 40MBit/s should have at least 1 GB of RAM."[1] My relay is sitting at ~2.77G currently. I set the option: MaxMemInQueues 6GB Just wondering if this is any cause for concern? I realize the utilization is less than the limit but I just don't remember relays I have run in the past using this much memory. Thanks [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

2 2

Port not rechable
by peter.zehetner＠liwest.at 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

I've opend the ports in my router. Could anybody be so kind to check my log and tell me wether it's ok or not? Mar 03 00:05:38.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Mar 03 00:05:45.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. Mar 03 00:09:29.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor. Mar 03 00:52:15.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening log file. Mar 03 00:52:47.000 [warn] Controller gave us config lines that didn't validate: RelayBandwidthBurst must be at least equal to RelayBandwidthRate. Mar 03 01:03:52.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening log file. Mar 03 01:04:03.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening log file. Mar 03 01:04:29.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening log file. Mar 03 04:33:03.000 [notice] Received reload signal (hup). Reloading config and resetting internal state. Mar 03 04:33:03.000 [notice] Read configuration file "/usr/share/tor/tor-service-defaults-torrc". Mar 03 04:33:03.000 [notice] Read configuration file "/etc/tor/torrc". Mar 03 04:33:03.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening log file. Mar 03 06:04:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 5:59 hours, with 2 circuits open. I've sent 70.69 MB and received 76.91 MB. Mar 03 06:04:27.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 4/4 NTor. Mar 03 06:04:27.000 [notice] Since startup, we have initiated 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 0 v3 connections, and 64 v4 connections; and received 0 v1 connections, 0 v2 connections, 10 v3 connections, and 193 v4 connections. Mar 03 07:35:04.000 [notice] Received reload signal (hup). Reloading config and resetting internal state. Mar 03 07:35:04.000 [notice] Read configuration file "/usr/share/tor/tor-service-defaults-torrc". Mar 03 07:35:04.000 [notice] Read configuration file "/etc/tor/torrc". and: Mar 03 07:35:04.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.14 opening new log file. Mar 03 08:12:11.000 [warn] Failed to start child process "tor-fw-helper" in state 9: No such file or directory -Peter Am 02.03.2018 um 22:18 schrieb Matthew Finkel: > Hi! > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:34:02PM +0100, peter.zehetner(a)liwest.at wrote: >> OK, now I've set PortForwarding in Tor-Arm from "False" to "True", then restarted Tor: > > Hrm, I'm not sure this will do what you want. In fact, this may do > absolutely nothing. Do you have administative access into your network > router? Maybe there is a website interface you used. This is where you > should configure port forwarding. Unfortunately this is complicated and > not easy plug-n-play. > >> >> ...has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. Please check... >> >> I'm going to run a non-exit-relay and I'm going to do this at home. >> >> Peter >> > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

2 1

No exit at home !!!
by for this post anon 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Roger say it right: No exit relay at home! I write this mail in anon because I had bad experience with that. I had the experience to get visitors early in the morning from the police department some months ago. After that I must by new computers... Use ISP's only for exits. Or you want "fun". xyz

3 2

Port not rechable
by peter.zehetner＠liwest.at 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. But canyouseeme.org said: Your ISP is not blocking port 80 Whats's wrong? Thanks Peter

6 6

Port not rechable
by peter.zehetner＠liwest.at 02 Mar '18

02 Mar '18

OK, now I've set PortForwarding in Tor-Arm from "False" to "True", then restarted Tor: ...has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. Please check... I'm going to run a non-exit-relay and I'm going to do this at home. Peter Am 02.03.2018 um 20:42 schrieb Matthew Finkel: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:27:29PM +0100, peter.zehetner(a)liwest.at wrote: >> Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: >> > > Thank you for running a relay. > >> Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. > > I do not see port 80 open, either: > > $ torsocks nc -v 81.10.248.112 80 > Ncat: Version 7.40 ( https://nmap.org/ncat ) > Ncat: Connection timed out. > >> >> But canyouseeme.org said: Your ISP is not blocking port 80 > > Maybe "not blocking" does not mean "is open". > > Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not > recommended, but you may need to allow port 80 on your firewall/router. > You may need to use port forwarding or add your computer into the DMZ > (if your router supports this). > > If you're not running this relay from home, is the server directly > connected to the Internet or is there a router/switch/blackbox in the > middle? > >> >> Whats's wrong? >> >> Thanks >> >> Peter > >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

2 1

Port not rechable
by peter.zehetner＠liwest.at 02 Mar '18

02 Mar '18

There is no firewall installed. Peter Have you double-checked your firewall? -Cody On 03/02/2018 11:27 AM, peter.zehetner(a)liwest.at mailto:peter.zehetner@liwest.at wrote: > > Hi, I'm still trying to run a tor delay. Here's the error: > > Your server (81.10.248.112:80) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. > > But canyouseeme.org said: Your ISP is not blocking port 80 > > Whats's wrong? > > Thanks > > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

2 1

Upcoming security releases for Tor 0.2.9 and up.
by Nick Mathewson 01 Mar '18

01 Mar '18

Hi! This coming week, we'll be putting out new stable releases for 0.2.9 and later supported branches to fix a few security bugs. The highest-severity bug to be fixed is severity "medium". (See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/teams/NetworkTeam/Securit… for information about how we rank security issues.) These releases will also backport the anti-DoS features from Tor 0.3.3. Relays and authorities should be sure to upgrade once packages are available; these issues are not high-priority for clients. best wishes, -- Nick

4 5

Unmeasured Flag
by Matthew Glennon 28 Feb '18

28 Feb '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 So if I'm understanding this correctly, we're still having problems with a bw testing nodes and that is why my relay has the unmetered flag? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.76 Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto wsBcBAABCgAGBQJalsdlAAoJEHIAmlM/NGGbpQcH/16WQLlMAAVzx4blIRV2bIJF Hwdyj4FFQ+Ms0hHhj1DwMkB6EMa11kogLA8k+NGim8QeF2Qyobd1lARUXjZdfbV5 s/L6JYYCO+PsJxJY2+nOU41HUps1w5zLfFy+ekxkVwsX8dXq+SVy06+1HXfjY2uT HJnIpkx9/IZWMjJzRv33ylIMDq4u0MltJr+4MRrb5rSn6+9pz9m4z6CeUKJbsiLh nE0YRblkRwfrlVCP3VTaaRyQdMUwWzKwnB9S8dtKGDKb+tYz4QduFuzBf1eGGrO7 cp9GeHiittyBSGylRWveQgbkzwXRGPuUGtabXutQRqGXDvanDtEroHg+hUP0SEw= =b7/2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

Re: [tor-relays] less than 3 bw auths available: self-measurement (with 10k cap in effect)
by Stian Fauskanger 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

if your relays behave strangely in terms of bandwidth seen, than this might be due to the fact that there are less than 3 bw auth votes available. If you run a fast relay it is capped to 10k cw. This affects currently the 857 fastest relays. It also affects "low-consensus" relays. I have a bw=5k relay which almost doubled the amount of traffic, increasing steadily from 14.30 UTC until 19.00 UTC [a.k.a. now]. I assume this is because 5k is a much higher percentage of the total bw now compared to when fast nodes was not capped at 10k and at the same time, 5k didn't "give" me enough traffic to meet RelayBandwidthRate. ~ Stian

1 0