- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

TOR exit notice (not USA)
by Christian Gagneraud 06 Sep '14

06 Sep '14

Hi there, I've just installed the tor-exit-notice.html (from contrib/) on my exit node, and read it carefully. I think this is great to have such a text, but 2 paragraphs are USA specific, the one about ECPA and the following one about DMCA. I would like to know if anyone knows about equivalent text for the European Union, Germany, France and New Zealand (I'm French, I'm a New Zealand resident and I run a TOR exit node on a server located in Germany) Thanks, Chris

4 4

Time information
by Marcin Gondek 05 Sep '14

05 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just looking on the logs and see: ==cut== Sep 02 21:03:54.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:443. It seems that our clock is behind by 1 hours, 24 minutes, or that theirs is ahead. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:06:04.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:9001. It seems that our clock is ahead by 1 hours, 4 minutes, or that theirs is behind. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:06:08.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:9001. It seems that our clock is ahead by 3 hours, 35 minutes, or that theirs is behind. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:06:58.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:9001. It seems that our clock is behind by 5 hours, 58 minutes, or that theirs is ahead. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:08:53.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:9001. It seems that our clock is behind by 1 hours, 54 minutes, or that theirs is ahead. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:10:49.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:9001. It seems that our clock is behind by 5 hours, 55 minutes, or that theirs is ahead. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:11:51.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:8443. It seems that our clock is ahead by 1 hours, 26 minutes, or that theirs is behind. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. Sep 02 21:11:52.000 [info] channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(): Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at x.x.x.x:449. It seems that our clock is ahead by 1 hours, 19 minutes, or that theirs is behind. Tor requires an accurate clock to work: please check your time and date settings. ==cut== Should I worry about it? Logs seems to little strange and looks that other servers provide it's local time without any timezone. [root@fido tor]# ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +x.x.x.x .PPS. 1 u 11 64 377 15.026 2.142 3.279 +x.x.x.x .PPS. 1 u 26 64 377 8.315 2.734 4.281 +x.x.x.x .PPS. 1 u 2 64 377 6.511 0.973 3.214 *x.x.x.x .PPS. 1 u 60 64 377 6.395 2.162 1.869 oGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 15 16 377 0.000 0.014 0.009 And server is a part of ntppool - valid. Regards, - -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter http://fido.e-utp.net/ AS56662 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Outlook Privacy Plugin iGkEARECACkFAlQGGCoiHE1hcmNpbiBHb25kZWsgPGRyaXh0ZXJAZS11dHAubmV0 PgAKCRCBZoxYcbpnGhhSAJ0RENGRgehGCb/9m/P2lTHR/2k+kACgwOIXsUNHS6FW 1AOwVQoeTwSPCO0= =OYl2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 8

ORCONN
by Yannick Krueck 03 Sep '14

03 Sep '14

Hello, I provide a Tor-Relay Server. I have a questions regarding the Tor control protocol. If i use "setevents orconn", i get a lot of Connections. Mostly i get first a "New/Launched" message, then a "Connected" message and then a "Failed/Closed" message. But sometimes i get only a "New"-message, and a "Connected" message, but I never receive a "Failed" or "Closed" message. In this case, i only get the IP Adress, but no LongName. For example: 650 ORCONN 81.219.94.108:1976 NEW 650 ORCONN 81.219.94.108:1976 CONNECTED => Never Receive a Closed oder Failed Message Additional i can not find the IP-Adress 81.219.94.108 on https://onionoo.torproject.org/details . The question: What or Who is 81.219.94.108? Another relay? A Bridge? A normal User (Entry Guard)? 81.219.94.108 is only an example, their are many more Nodes with the similar procedure. Thank you for answering my question Y. Krueck (Germany)

1 0

oniontip.com
by Sebastian Urbach 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hi, I like to suggest adding oniontip.com to the "Donate" section on the tor website. It's a nice possibility to help the Relay-Oerators. Have a nice day. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours Sebastian Urbach ---------------------------------------------- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ---------------------------------------------- Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790), Inventor, journalist, printer, diplomat and statesman -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours Sebastian Urbach ---------------------------------------------- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ---------------------------------------------- Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790), Inventor, journalist, printer, diplomat and statesman

4 4

is a KVM fine for a first quick test to setup a tor exit node
by Toralf Förster 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

I do have here a Gentoo Linux and a KVM (Gentoo too) - now I'm wondering if I can just emerge the Gentoo Tor package here in the KVM and play with it or should I prepare few things before to avoid that it will be used by the Tor network immediately ? -- Toralf pgp key: 0076 E94E

2 1

Expired Key
by Sebastian Urbach 30 Aug '14

30 Aug '14

Hi, The key from deb.torproject.org archive is expired, a new one would be nice. The installation information in the docu should be updated to the new key id as well. Thanks -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours Sebastian Urbach ---------------------------------------------- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ---------------------------------------------- Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790), Inventor, journalist, printer, diplomat and statesman

2 1

Authdir is rejecting routers in this range
by Davíð Steinn Geirsson 29 Aug '14

29 Aug '14

Hi all, I rented a dedicated server to run a tor relay (100Mbit/s) to contribute to the network. On this machine, tor gives messages like these on startup: http status 400 ("Authdir is rejecting routers in this range.") response from dirserver '<...>'. Please correct. The server is hosted with https://fdcservers.net/. Did I just get unlucky in picking a provider? Is there a way to check these things before spending money on setup + monthly fees? Best regards, Davíð

4 5

Key expired problem - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
by kingqueen 29 Aug '14

29 Aug '14

I'm experiencing difficulties running apt-get update as it complaints that the repository's key is out of date. Here's the error: W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://deb.torproject.org precise Release: The following signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1409325681 KEYEXPIRED 1409325681 KEYEXPIRED 1409325681 KEYEXPIRED 1409325681 W: Failed to fetch http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/precise/Release W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. When I set the relay up, I used Option Two on this page https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian to install tor and deb.torproject.org-keyring . Updates worked for 10 weeks or so and now don't. I've tried going through the same processes again, to no avail. Any assistance very gratefully received.

2 1

Centos 7
by obx 28 Aug '14

28 Aug '14

There are no packages for centos 7 yet. Is there an ETA? Is there anything we can do/contribute?

3 2

Re: [tor-relays] Advantage in more exits in the same /8?
by Jesse Victors 27 Aug '14

27 Aug '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA384 On 08/27/2014 04:03 PM, tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org wrote: > Not to drift too far off course, but I think you have your masking > back wards or confused at least. > > a /8 is 16M addresses 18.0.0.0/8 for example, so not a small block, > and a /16 has 64K. > > two consecutive /16's say 128.30.0.0/16 and 128.31.0.0/16 make a /15 > (120.30.0.0/15) > > the real concern is administrative control not addressing. for exmaple > both the /8 and /15 mentioned above and some other smaller patches of > addressing are all on MIT campus and part of the same administrative > domain in the sense that all traffic passes through a small set of > routers at some point. Being a university it doesn't imediately imply > root access to all servers. this isn't true of all (or even most) > /8's, nor does even a /24 with 256 addresses need to be in a single > geographic or andministrative zone. > > -Jon Thanks Jon, You're right, I had my ranges weird, even in my title, thanks for the correction. To clarify, because the nodes are physically close to one another, they are in the same /24, namely x.x.x.x - x.x.x.y. Yes, the real issues is the traffic concentration to a specific set of routers, which is why I'm asking. I'm trying to get a sense of where to draw the line, but from the responses so far it looks like I've got room to spare. - -- Jesse V. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQF8BAEBCQBmBQJT/lfPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxMjgyMjhENjEyODQ1OTU1NzBCMjgwRkFB RDk3MzY0RkMyMEJFQzgwAAoJEK2XNk/CC+yAYCwH/i6Ci/SS6dpXr703mlajr31C fXX2WOKVWoGGTkPDXkQJM18+uI0DGRaieahmQ99VAGwA8+PAFhq9QsISLZ/Bby9g rZCOkY9E9xel2uu80hiMlP99h4WkjJtbgeX1cGXXOoJq1d+MLHIzQqgzZvmVry2+ piIUsXRO693r+TiU6BzZjnpBm+Omo6BzvOuJmUq34/XztdrGWSfoCvpwlesbMJZc sNGN1N5wQ3U1FcQTkwJc2wVyTpQNyu+tgvZyqwusIwAlH7J9cN/zg+eNZ+3ZpPUv 7DjiKhwQCQUqv/LHC5sK7FmQNELLwXPGvTaflvjfhF9uSBWCAX9JVEBNsHrB1M0= =77pe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0