tor-relays

tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

36 participants
4815 discussions

Unblocking blacklisted exits [was: suspicious]
by grarpamp 07 Jun '14

07 Jun '14

> But it's also listed on http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=5.104.224.5 as If you find exits on blacklists, you could try to contact the operator via their descriptor contact, exit http banner, etc so that they can try to have it removed. Usually a few clicks on an assertion of ownership/cleanliness and an email ack is all that's needed for removal. Since ownership of IP's is always in flux from perspective of BL's such that any 'real' owner could always do it too, absent exit contact info, many users could probably submit removal for them without issues. There's a project covering this on the wiki: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/projects/DontBlockMe

1 0

Tor bridges with AWS
by CD 06 Jun '14

06 Jun '14

I've signed up to AWS with Tor's instructions for bridges. I've intalled Tor on my PC. Wondering how to proceed. Am obviously an illiterate newbie, so any links for a basic knowledge-base would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

3 3

Re: [tor-relays] Update your OpenSSL, several high-risk CVEs
by Jesse Victors 06 Jun '14

06 Jun '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thanks. I saw the OpenSSL update, but thanks for explaining what it was about. Is it necessary to restart Tor to apply the update? Jesse V. On 06/06/2014 04:00 AM, tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:36:06 +0200 > From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen(a)massar.ch> > To: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > Subject: [tor-relays] Update your OpenSSL, several high-risk CVEs > Message-ID: <53908056.50209(a)massar.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > See for the details: > > https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt > > Debian etc all have packages available. > > Greets, > Jeroen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTkdiSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxMjgyMjhENjEyODQ1OTU1NzBCMjgwRkFB RDk3MzY0RkMyMEJFQzgwAAoJEK2XNk/CC+yABpUIAJ9ZSohmGuH3r4UEg//FrYRF 3IJc6UPJx22FU0pdplN09I5L0LRzH7SehJly62niid6XNS/8bKByzjkvrnik0qRP Hjo8Rq4C/2wbRJU0w8MHvpCRLFhTRdCHdGI2+HkUaYbp7abwIZVWbTMdXB0T5lGx KvSgMeQfmlWzkwEb3WqDUqcc2NJG5D3K5WFV4WOsAi+KerBUiNyJKUqwGRd21PgS VV6S4JLQy0PVKdCAIbeEeOy2xclRfwKjBfe8RVD9b8fOmBY6ty7v1k6Org54PceA hLtJXDQXg9XQfe1u2T+peEYxf1bYIZMu+DI/7DJ0xFDr6naxJ4ttQabE2WmN6lE= =FOEn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

05 Jun '14

If you have not already, you should consider signing up for EFF's tor challenge https://www.eff.org/torchallenge/ Today also marks the Reset the Net event https://www.resetthenet.org/ -- Adam Brenner <adam(a)aeb.io>

1 0

Update your OpenSSL, several high-risk CVEs
by Jeroen Massar 05 Jun '14

05 Jun '14

See for the details: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt Debian etc all have packages available. Greets, Jeroen

1 0

Best way for normal OS X users to run a relay?
by Roger Dingledine 05 Jun '14

05 Jun '14

What is the best way to run a relay on OS X currently? Now that the Vidalia bundles are deprecated and hard to find, I believe we have no packages or bundles for OS X other than TBB 3.x? So either "install from source, write your own init script, hope you know what ulimit -n is, good luck with that" or "install tbb3 and edit the torrc, still hope you know what ulimit -n is" are the current options? Compare with https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian for the Debian/Ubuntu users, where our deb takes care of a lot of these things for them. Assuming my summary is accurate, what are some good ways to move forward here? Thanks! --Roger

7 7

VPS for tor exit nodes
by Contra Band 04 Jun '14

04 Jun '14

Dear exit node operators, Could you please recommend vps providers allowing to run tor exit nodes? I checked many vps operators but most of them allow relays but not exit nodes according to AUP or ToS. thanks.

9 13

Re: [tor-relays] "as well as block BitTorrent after repeated offenses..."
by Tor Admin 04 Jun '14

04 Jun '14

Hi, I'll happily block BitTorrent it before any offenses start. Just tell me how. Regards, =-John-= <snip snip> Spencer Neitzke <spencer(a)neitzke.me> spake thusly: > as well as block BitTorrent after repeated offenses -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] VPS for tor exit nodes
by Mike Patton 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

I have an exit with exigent here in Australia. They advised by email that they don't have an issue with Tor. M. On 4 Jun 2014 08:56, I <beatthebastards(a)inbox.com> wrote: > > > So can you post some provider names? > > Comsitec.de is one which is ok with exits but I have a lot of trouble getting their attention when it stops. > It is in Germany which is much better than being in USA because the mentality is better. > Two I have which now say exits are not accepted are Lunanode and Bluevm. One which was expensive but good is DrServer/AbusiveCores. The guy set up Tor when I had a problem with Linux!. > > Since some have said yes to exits when I paid but a week later 'introduced a new policy' I wonder if it is worth being open. If you know what can be done with fifteen VPSs for the next nine months which can't have Tor please tell me. > > Lowendbox.com is good for scavenging addresses and sudden bargains but it may be better in the long run to pay a little more and get more cooperation. > > It may be more useful to Tor at the moment to provide bridges and for that, I believe, the very cheapest VPSs would do the job e.g. $AUD15/year. > > Robert > > > So can you post some provider names? > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

1 0

Usefulness of very limited exit policy nodes?
by Phil 31 May '14

31 May '14

Hi, Opinions please - is it worthwhile running an exit node on a home DSL connection with limited bandwidth and exit policies? I'm talking 150Mb per day, 20Kb/s, and only allowing ports 80, 443 and 53 out. I'm concerned about potential abuse from exit traffic more so than limited bandwidth. I've only had it up for a few days and the bandwidth is being used. Is such an exit policy useful for the network? Or would I be better off just running as a relay? Are there other ports that I could allow to exit that would make this node more useful, while not greatly increasing the risk of abuse reports coming my way? Phil

4 5

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

tor-relays