- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Globe offline
by eliaz 28 Mar '15

28 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Account suspended? Atlas isn't running so hot either. rats... - eliaz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVFl2RAAoJEDqas5IE3vgrpEkIAJhliXOS7VqXN36WkgEceHa+ h61MIFmulErgzlEcLJ71cJlgS9kEpPYlqVdNiOl6xEybjzwgOBfUP8Rg7wtVk7uc CgPr746XE2ld0B3Q4Hs+ZNRDPbrqXoOTCOxAf+1wqE1wQ0wmU3L0+5nhr9qtaTII f6BQKWj3gwoKk+mkc+2xSZKAgmSZm83hY/IEvmEsrdOgfEUiDbdsHVnm/ZmYkR8q FY5QRYbyV3RxNQHsgEXIrIB2CimC0y7ZdgGPN40dbsWT9ZJAjj0b7hhEkCaAnEUp 9SMD1DxA5Qa/I4hNkKTWAkreRoDUGWGC3MoUJ7AYTHMfULPHLmCi+gDxrzzIHgA= =cZB/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

Monitoring my bridge I
by eliaz 27 Mar '15

27 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Since March 24 globe has been showing no bandwidth usage for my bridge. At the same time I'm measuring non-zero bandwidth locally. These local measurements run about Received ~ 10 x Sent bits. The bridge is connected to live circuits as per atlas. I've had erratic traffic since the powers that be have decreed that bridges be locked into a small number of entry nodes for long periods. when Received ~ Sent & I see traffic, interspersed with periods where Received >> Sent & no traffic. I don't *think* globe is an error, since I'm not reading any client traffic, only pokes from entry nodes. Here is my configuration, which worked fine previously: BridgeRelay 1 ## fteproxy configuration ClientTransportPlugin fte exec TorBrowser\Tor\PluggableTransports \fteproxy --managed # obfsproxy configuration ClientTransportPlugin obfs2,obfs3,scramblesuit exec TorBrowser\Tor \PluggableTransports\obfsproxy managed ## It doesn't seem to matter whether I enable the above portable transports or not. ContactInfo xxx at xxx gpg xxx DataDirectory C:\xxx\tor\TBB installed\Tor Browser\Browser\TorBrowser\Data\Tor DirPort 0 DirReqStatistics 0 ExitPolicy reject *:* GeoIPFile C:\xxx\tor\TBB installed\Tor Browser\Browser\TorBrowser\Data\Tor\geoip GeoIPv6File C:\xxx\tor\TBB installed\Tor Browser\Browser\TorBrowser\Data\Tor\geoip6 Nickname xxx ORPort 443 RelayBandwidthBurst 196608 RelayBandwidthRate 98304 NumCPUs 2 SafeLogging 0 Maybe someone can see if the problem lies in this torrc, Or somewhere else. Or is this behavior just par for the course? Thanks - eliaz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVFZ+bAAoJEDqas5IE3vgrYuAH/2+xr8RRHnI7lds5BFvRHC5A S8J6thDyEBGMV40YiEL1l7KHidPVcrEN/a1JjC+x000X1nooESkObkpnjdGrGVTJ Ofx73v36azB0lIIHaSjiSBQx4LqNwk6h7tfVYOAZXD3Ryc9Es1GAiPpnENRUmkMk G+CeLXCwCAt2RLhC3T/olb9tM0VfuQ2LhEk9Fykx2hTlg4gO8YUJa3WA2bkJQ730 0B9Cbp5C7lfU9pYqNGjtbAVyZX5SSo4PWXGrbmV3yfX+Sz/9e75CZHZAF9B03Qai oLSz8XpkP3KfhR9JZ0xKqjPZ1xqj5oQdj2pnXw0nzN++f6crj92XnyO/+vFbTPs= =hdI4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Hardware specs for Tor Relay
by yl 26 Mar '15

26 Mar '15

Hello, I clicked myself a cheap vserver 20 days ago and it runs Tor since then. I mainly did this to play a bit with the relay, try around and so. I took over another relay a while ago, an exit, I don't want to try around on that. It runs well, I got about 4,4 TB data up AND down since then, I have it running with 20-40Mb/s on a 100Mb/s connection (according to the hoster 100Mb/s), it runs as a non exit. CPU load it pretty high all the time according to arm it's about 80-100%, but with htop I can see that only one core of the CPU is busy, the others are not. I figured that the CPU is so busy because the vserver doesn't have AES-NI, which I confirmed by some command I run (forgot the command). So I thought I might wanna move that relay to another server, maybe at the same hoster to get higher data transfer. What hardware specs do you have and is my assumption correct with the AES-NI being one part of the bottleneck? Thanks yl

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] Hardware specs for Tor Relay
by Sebastian Urbach 26 Mar '15

26 Mar '15

On March 26, 2015 8:59:45 PM yl <tor(a)yl.ms> wrote: Hi, > Hello, > I clicked myself a cheap vserver 20 days ago and it runs Tor since then. > I mainly did this to play a bit with the relay, try around and so. I > took over another relay a while ago, an exit, I don't want to try around > on that. > > It runs well, I got about 4,4 TB data up AND down since then, I have it > running with 20-40Mb/s on a 100Mb/s connection (according to the hoster > 100Mb/s), it runs as a non exit. CPU load it pretty high all the time > according to arm it's about 80-100%, but with htop I can see that only > one core of the CPU is busy, the others are not. > > I figured that the CPU is so busy because the vserver doesn't have > AES-NI, which I confirmed by some command I run (forgot the command). Did you ask them if you can get it ? I had a VPS a while ago and they said "we disabled that for compatibility reasons" but if you want it we will turn it on. And they did it for free :-) > > So I thought I might wanna move that relay to another server, maybe at > the same hoster to get higher data transfer. > > What hardware specs do you have and is my assumption correct with the > AES-NI being one part of the bottleneck? It is the no. 1 bottleneck from my experience. I still hope that we are going to see the crypto-multithreading feature at some point in the future. -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic.

1 0

missing tor-0.2.5.11 package for armhf wheezy
by jensm1 26 Mar '15

26 Mar '15

Hi there, I'm running a relay on my NAS at home and just realised that it's still running on 0.2.5.10. So I went and checked the deb.torproject.org repository for wheezy and found that the tor package hasn't been updated for the armhf-architecture (for the other archs it's fine). Funny enough, the tor-geoipdb package has been updated to 0.2.5.11 which broke it for me, since it depends on tor 0.2.5.11. I hope that's the right place for this, otherwise please point me to where it belongs, thanks!

1 0

Undiagnosable Crashes in Relays
by skyhighatrist 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Hello List, I am wondering if anyone has had their relay randomly crash in the past week or so. Three of mine (I run 6, nonexits) have fallen over. One of them ~5 days ago, one of them ~4 days ago, and one of them earlier today . The logs indicate everything was operating normally, and the only reason I noticed they had crashed was when I was checking what bandwidth globe.torproject was measuring for them it said some were down. The affected relays are as follows: AC9803701F9EE18194D40B38E47CE4C68CF2F567 73067CD4ADD8A294BDA913DF45B63190A52B5F9F D76252B1A6E9F01FC6772CFFB651056A2B54F92B I have no idea why they all fell over, the last thing in the logs was the usual "current status" output with some traffic measuring, seemingly immediately afterwards, the process killed itself for no reason. All of the affected relays are on DigitalOcean droplets. I intend to launch more on EC2 in the near future, however, would like to know if anyone else has experienced relay instability issues over the past few days incase its something nasty like a denial of service attempt or something. Nothing on the boxes indicates any kind of compromise, just the usual bruteforce activity from the usual actors. I have decided to start writing a "Shitty Monitoring System" to copy logs down to my local box every hour or so and HUP tor at the same time as a kind of countermeasure incase its simply a resource use issue or something, however, would love to know if anyone else has been having similar issues lately. Regards, .d

5 8

Public Tor Socks port
by yl 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Hello, I wonder what is the reason not to offer the socks port publicly to users as an entrance point to the tor network? Assume you run a tor exit or relay on a public server and you enable the socks port and listen on 0.0.0.0 or so and accept all incomming connections. Then you post the socks port publicly. What are the reasons not to do so? Thanks yl

3 3

Tor-Tshirts
by Nchinda Nchinda 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

Is there still someone at Tor Weather managing tshirt distribution? I've been running a two fairly large relays for a couple months, although I also wouldn't mind paying for an official tor shirt. My email to Tor Weather went unanswered. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/C1CFB375BED9D7506569E07B01753BC67EE87… https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CAB78BF9BD73536DCB55E5BC98D5F3AAB45CF… Nchinda^2 -0.1743*kg^6 m^4 mol s^-14 Computer Scientist the light flares at this node

7 9

Help finding relay bottleneck
by James Murphy 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

I'm running the relay https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/18EAAF7CB6C2ABE8583841D305C06A509F8C1C… and am getting substantially lower rates than expected after almost 3 months. I'm on a 1Gbps down/1Gbps up line but my middle relay is just barely creeping upwards of 5Mbps. This is NOT a problem of less bandwidth after receiving the guard flag, and I have read the lifecycle of a new relay documentation. I cannot find the bottleneck in my setup and was wondering if there are any good tools I could use to find where it is. I've read https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server and https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/tor for tips on speeding things up, but nothing has proven successful. Things I have considered: CPU usage: hovers around 5-10%, using NumCPUs 2 Mem usage: 195 MB (10%), using DisableAllSwap 1 Using AvoidDiskWrites 1 to avoid SSD stress Rate/Burst limits at 20MB (160mbps) Using dd if=/dev/urandom of=rand bs=64M count=16 iflag=fullblock to create a 1GB file I test copying this file to/from another machine on my LAN using scp 100% 1024MB 28.4MB/s 00:36 to copy to the relay (307 Mbps) 100% 1024MB 53.9MB/s 00:19 to download from the relay (431.2 Mbps) Okay so not full 1Gbps speeds, but still an order of magnitude higher than the 5Mbps my relay is using, so the problem doesn't look like it is the router or gigabit switch on my LAN. I've also raised the maximum number of open file descriptors for the debian-tor user. In /etc/security/limits.conf I added debian-tor soft nofile 65000 debian-tor hard nofile 65000 I'm not sure if this worked because (even after reboot) sudo -u debian-tor bash ulimit -Hn returns 4096. I would say that is the problem, but looking in /proc/torPID/fd and doing ls -l | wc -l returns 1591, so I'm not hitting the limit of 4096. In any case, if you know why my limits.conf doesn't appear to have taken effect, let me know. I've also added other optimizations from the torservers wiki. My /etc/sysctl.conf is http://paste.debian.net/162765/ Thanks for the help, James Murphy

5 7

Ideas for the further development of TorServers
by Jens Kubieziel 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

Hi, during our relay operators meeting in Valencia as well as in IRC/XMPP we were discussing the future way of TorServers. Some of you had some good ideas and I started to put them into a list. TorServers will try to apply for funding this year as our current funding will expire or has expired. So we plan to integrate some or all of the ideas into our application and help you as relay operators. The current version of the list is at <URL:https://pad.systemli.org/p/ukMTrpwf6Yzv>. I'll add some more text in the next days. Feel free to add some comments, ideas, wishes etc. -- Jens Kubieziel http://www.kubieziel.de Ich würde gern leben wie ein armer Mann mit einem Haufen Geld. Pablo Picasso

2 2