- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Sharing experience with Via Nano 1.6ghz with Padlock hw accel
by Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists 06 Jun '16

06 Jun '16

Hello, i wanted to share the experience in running a Tor Relay (no-exit) on a small embedded computer costing 7eur/month at oneprovider with unlimited 1Gbps bandwidth (at least they say that): VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz Capable) 2GB Ram I had to install to get the hw acceleration library: Tor version 0.2.8.1-alpha (git-9093e3769746742f). In /etc/tor/torrc: HardwareAccel 1 AccelName padlock I see with iptraf 60.000kbit/s peak with 30% uses of main CPU. I'm wondering if that small boxes are hitting a limit of the hardware acceleration or limit of the provider or Tor network itself. There's a way to measure the uses of the hw acceleration given by the Via Padlock, if it's at 10% of it's capacity or 100% ? -- Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights http://logioshermes.org - https://globaleaks.org - https://tor2web.org - https://ahmia.fi

5 8

OBFS-4 Bridge Relay with 0 clients seen in more than one month
by fr33d0m4all 04 Jun '16

04 Jun '16

Hi, I'm running a Tor relay which is working fine and a Tor Bridge Relay on port 995 (ORPort is 465) which is reachable from the outside that has been running for more than one month and has never been contacted by any client. I've tried to use it with Tor Browser from outside my own network and it works fine. Does it take so long for an OBFS4 bridge relay to become known and used by someone? Best regards, Freedom For All -- _____________________________________________________________ PGP Key: 0DA8 7293 D561 3AEE A3C0 7F63 101F 316A F30E ECB4 IRC Nick: fr33d0m4all (OFTC & Freenode) _____________________________________________________________

4 3

Is Media Temple a good VPS provider for Tor Exit Nodes
by marykate＠airmail.cc 03 Jun '16

03 Jun '16

Hi, I need a VPS for running a Tor Exit node, and am eyeing Media Temple, but am unsure if MT is good for running Tor nodes. Is anybody using MT for running Tor exits? If so, what's your experience? Are they Tor friendly, or are they hostile to Tor nodes and actively oppose them? Are there better VPS providers? Best, Mary Kate

3 2

[warn] Received http status code 504 ("Gateway Time-out") from server '154.35.175.225:80' while fetching "/tor/ ...
by Robin Kjeld 03 Jun '16

03 Jun '16

Tor version 0.2.7.6 Tor relay logged this a few times: Jun 02 07:24:40.000 [warn] Received http status code 504 ("Gateway Time- out") from server '154.35.175.225:80' while fetching "/tor/server/d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z". I'll try again soon. Best regards Robin

2 1

Questions on traffic differences between two Exit relays in two different locations
by pa011 02 Jun '16

02 Jun '16

I would like to understand the working of two exit relays, one is about 7 days old -the other worked as a middle relay before and is an exit now for about two weeks. The second one has a higher potential connection up to 250 Mbit/s while the first is supposed to be limited on 100 Mbit/s. They both run (Linux 3.16.0-4...), Tor 0.2.7.6, both use half or less of their CPU and Memory. So why does the second node in a different city in Eastern Europe not attract more traffic compared to the first one and thereby uses its full capacity, even when the second one is longer in the market? Could please somebody explain or send me some links to read ? Does this depend on the location of the node and in which way? Node 1: day rx | tx | total | avg. rate ------------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------- 26.05.2016 594,06 MiB | 121,20 MiB | 715,27 MiB | 67,82 kbit/s 27.05.2016 30,22 GiB | 30,20 GiB | 60,42 GiB | 5,87 Mbit/s 28.05.2016 188,73 GiB | 191,03 GiB | 379,76 GiB | 36,87 Mbit/s 29.05.2016 216,98 GiB | 220,23 GiB | 437,21 GiB | 42,45 Mbit/s 30.05.2016 280,10 GiB | 285,21 GiB | 565,31 GiB | 54,89 Mbit/s 31.05.2016 334,17 GiB | 338,36 GiB | 672,53 GiB | 65,30 Mbit/s 01.06.2016 678,74 GiB | 691,32 GiB | 1,34 TiB | 133,02 Mbit/s 02.06.2016 714,88 GiB | 726,10 GiB | 1,41 TiB | Node2: day rx | tx | total | avg. rate ------------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------- 05/12/16 24.68 GiB | 25.66 GiB | 50.34 GiB | 4.89 Mbit/s 05/13/16 64.18 GiB | 66.27 GiB | 130.45 GiB | 12.67 Mbit/s 05/14/16 68.34 GiB | 70.30 GiB | 138.63 GiB | 13.46 Mbit/s 05/15/16 66.34 GiB | 68.00 GiB | 134.34 GiB | 13.04 Mbit/s 05/16/16 72.87 GiB | 74.51 GiB | 147.38 GiB | 14.31 Mbit/s 05/17/16 73.32 GiB | 74.74 GiB | 148.06 GiB | 14.38 Mbit/s 05/18/16 81.14 GiB | 82.17 GiB | 163.30 GiB | 15.86 Mbit/s 05/19/16 72.22 GiB | 74.33 GiB | 146.55 GiB | 14.23 Mbit/s 05/20/16 74.62 GiB | 76.93 GiB | 151.55 GiB | 14.71 Mbit/s 05/21/16 96.44 GiB | 98.68 GiB | 195.12 GiB | 18.94 Mbit/s 05/22/16 227.48 GiB | 225.03 GiB | 452.50 GiB | 43.93 Mbit/s 05/23/16 216.46 GiB | 214.71 GiB | 431.17 GiB | 41.86 Mbit/s 05/24/16 231.87 GiB | 227.53 GiB | 459.41 GiB | 44.60 Mbit/s 05/25/16 302.77 GiB | 298.03 GiB | 600.80 GiB | 58.33 Mbit/s 05/26/16 280.37 GiB | 273.64 GiB | 554.01 GiB | 53.79 Mbit/s 05/27/16 318.75 GiB | 312.23 GiB | 630.98 GiB | 61.26 Mbit/s 05/28/16 317.57 GiB | 311.64 GiB | 629.21 GiB | 61.09 Mbit/s 05/29/16 271.41 GiB | 267.75 GiB | 539.16 GiB | 52.35 Mbit/s 05/30/16 290.85 GiB | 284.82 GiB | 575.67 GiB | 55.89 Mbit/s 05/31/16 323.61 GiB | 313.39 GiB | 637.00 GiB | 61.85 Mbit/s 06/01/16 279.34 GiB | 276.31 GiB | 555.65 GiB | 53.95 Mbit/s 06/02/16 259.17 GiB | 256.20 GiB | 515.38 GiB |

3 2

Tor Weather has been discontinued
by Karsten Loesing 02 Jun '16

02 Jun '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear relay operators, as of April 4, 2016, Tor Weather has been discontinued. Tor Weather [0] provided an email notification service to any user who wanted to monitor the status of a Tor node. Upon subscribing, they could specify what types of alerts they would like to receive. The main purpose of Tor Weather was to notify node operators via email if their node was down for longer than a specified period, but other notification types were available, including one where operators would be informed when their node was around long enough to qualify for a t-shirt. The main reason for discontinuing Tor Weather is the fact that software requires maintenance, and Tor Weather is no exception. Tor Weather was promising t-shirts for relays that have not been around long enough or that provided too little bandwidth to be useful to the network, and it was almost impossible to deny a t-shirt after Tor Weather has promised it. Apart from that, Tor Weather was likely not offering t-shirts to people who have long earned it, thereby confusing them. An unreliable notification system is worse than not having a system at all. Relay operators shouldn't rely on Tor Weather to notify them when their relay fails. They should rather set up their own system instead. We have tried to find a new maintainer for Tor Weather for years, but without success. We started rewriting Tor Weather [1] using Onionoo [2] as data back-end in 2014, and even though that project didn't produce working code, somebody could pick up this efforts and finish the rewrite. The Roster developers said that they're planning to include an email notification function in Roster [3]. And we developed a simple Python script that provides information about a relay operator's eligibility for acquiring a t-shirt [4]. None of these alternatives is a full replacement of Weather, though. We encourage you, the community of Tor relay operators, to step up to start your own notification systems and to share designs and code. Tor Weather is still a good idea, it just needs somebody to implement it. Tor Weather is discontinued in two steps. For now, new subscriptions are disabled, new welcome messages are not sent out anymore, and existing subscriptions continue working until June 30, 2016. From July 1, 2016 on, Tor Weather will not be sending out any emails. Sorry for any inconvenience caused by this. All the best, Karsten [0] https://weather.torproject.org/ [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/weather-in-2014 [2] https://onionoo.torproject.org/ [3] http://www.tor-roster.org/ [4] https://gitweb.torproject.org/metrics-tasks.git/tree/task-9889/tshirt.py -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXAn7HAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBmhEIAKxWEwex5pyp5RBHkE4+1IC2 WaKjcvIT0WiZJ8prZASNSxF7ART6r2trG50+Pd2GCdu0SOjIz3eeQNSkx251RaqF xF7dw2RVhExcYOar4FG5+KkXu6X3k0svMvNeMGzcRd51yaaVeW8OaAgV0NC+CHgE ZkA7bg26jCvG8EFrKCg4fuZ3JW3+O3mvcquea+aB4q6gbuQFjgoxzfH5+XkmpA5i gDZnsIRuBDYuUW8V1ior/7DG2wGlCjWZUotoTysfsFW2FSMUrTBZOlvhpHicMfER VpLxY8+b3ZGC6Olit50ISZql8l12yO3Hik32eKIcgK2fpx6vgKE+T83I8voIpOU= =LVj8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

7 11

ansible-relayor 0.1.0 released
by nusenu 02 Jun '16

02 Jun '16

Hi, ansible-relayor is an ansible [1] role for tor relay operators. Whether you setup/operate a single or many relays, ansible-relayor can help you automate all steps including secure offline key [2] generation, multi-instance setup and MyFamily management. https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor Main benefits for a tor relay operator ====================================== * security: Ed25519 master keys are kept offline * easy key renewal with a single command * security: every tor instance is run with a distinct user * automatically makes use of IPv6 IPs (if available) * automatic MyFamily management * automatic multi-instance setup (configurable) * easily restore/move a relay Supported Platforms =================== * FreeBSD 10.x * OpenBSD 5.9 * Debian 8 * Ubuntu 16.04 * CentOS 7 * Fedora 23 Installation ============ relayor is available via ansible-galaxy: ansible-galaxy install nusenu.relayor https://galaxy.ansible.com/nusenu/relayor/ Documentation ============== https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/wiki playbook examples: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/wiki/relayor-playbook-examples migration steps for existing relays https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/wiki/Migration-Steps git tags are signed with: pub 4096R/4D705DE9 2016-02-11 Key fingerprint = A7B5 DB91 CE04 C9E0 BE66 446B 8CBE 52BD 4D70 5DE9 uid ansible-relayor signing key (https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor) regards, nusenu [1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/intro_getting_started.html [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorRelaySecurity/Offli neKeys

1 0

The Tor's non-discretionary model - Milica D. Djekic
by Milica Đekić 01 Jun '16

01 Jun '16

Would Tor use a non-discretionary model of data transfer between the relays that would be a part of non-centralized network? Is there any real encryption in sense of information flow or only a conversion from discrete to non-discrete signal? Which circuitry algorithm would get used for so? Sorry, for asking all of these - I am just reading the history of anonymity. Thank you so much! On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org> wrote: > Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tor-relays-owner(a)lists.torproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (Roger Dingledine) > 2. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (Greg Moss) > 3. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (JovianMallard) > 4. Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It > (Peter Palfrader) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:21:38 -0400 > From: Roger Dingledine <arma(a)mit.edu> > To: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never > Initiated It] > Message-ID: <20160531232138.GB55745(a)moria.seul.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote: > > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package. > > Hi folks, > > I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+ > people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things > concise and on-topic. > > Thanks! > --Roger > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:25:32 -0700 > From: Greg Moss <gmoss82(a)gmail.com> > To: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never > Initiated It] > Message-ID: > <CALA4K1TTE11B21p7Vb3+K=GBiomzJT5o_kk= > EwUOn0Mbwo_v9A(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thanks Mr dingledine- was a good laugh but enough is enough > On May 31, 2016 4:21 PM, "Roger Dingledine" <arma(a)mit.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote: > > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package. > > Hi folks, > > I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+ > people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things > concise and on-topic. > > Thanks! > --Roger > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >

1 0

I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It
by Percy Blakeney 01 Jun '16

01 Jun '16

According to files and folders I have on two separate computers in my house, I am running a Tor exit but I absolutely have nothing to do with it. I am only able to physically view certain files ie; var/log/tor, etc/tor/torrc, while other files like var/lib/tor/lock the content is invisible. I am MORE than willing to talk to anyone who may be able to help.

7 10

Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It]
by Greg Moss 31 May '16

31 May '16

Thanks Mr dingledine- was a good laugh but enough is enough On May 31, 2016 4:21 PM, "Roger Dingledine" <arma(a)mit.edu> wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote: > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package. Hi folks, I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+ people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things concise and on-topic. Thanks! --Roger _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

1 0