- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Config question
by r1610091651 11 Jan '21

11 Jan '21

Hi Recently upgraded to 4.4.6 and noticed new (for me) entry in tor logs: Jan 11 09:24:28.000 [notice] While bootstrapping, fetched this many bytes: This message gets repeated every 6 hours, while there is little extra info added, as it relates to bootstrap / start-up process. I already have "AvoidDiskWrites 1" active in torrc. Is there a way to disable this extra logging? Thanks

1 0

Some ContactInfo Spec Adoption Stats
by nusenu 06 Jan '21

06 Jan '21

Hi, it is great to see that just 2-3 months after publishing version 2 of the ContactInfo Information Sharing Spec [1] there are already over 100 tor relays (>10% exit probability) making use of it, to allow for automated verification of the url field in the ContactInfo. If you are still using version 1 of the spec I'd encourage you to update to version 2, which usually isn't a big effort. Due to the adoption I also started to add stats for it to OrNetStats, but since the proofs and ContactInfo strings are public, everyone can verify it: https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/#verified-operator-domains Currently it does only consider the well-known URI proofs (the DNS proof will also be added). It is also important to note that a verified domain does not say anything about the intentions of an operator, it just prevents things like [2] where a malicious entity claimed to be some other operator by using their ContactInfo without a good automated method to tell them appart, especially if MyFamily is not properly set. And it will also make things easier when tagging relays as "known" or "unknown" [3], since it allows tagging on an operator level instead of trying to figure out who the real operator behind each and every relay is, by using unverified ContactInfo claims manually. In the near future I'd like to make use of the data to generate operator level time series graphs and overall stacked graphs. If you would like to play with the ContactInfo strings yourself, here is an early parser: https://github.com/erans/torcontactinfoparser In the past we had a small error in the generator (field name "gpg:..." was used instead of "pgp:...") this has been fixed: https://torcontactinfogenerator.netlify.app/ kind regards, nusenu [1] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2020-October/019024.html [2] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2020-October/019045.html [3] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/metrics/relay-search/-/issues/40001 -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu

1 0

consensus
by Felix 06 Jan '21

06 Jan '21

Hi https://consensus-health.torproject.org/consensus-health shows: Consensus was published 2021-01-06 05:00:00 UTC. Unusual Authorities: moria1 Consensus could not be retrieved dizum Consensus could not be retrieved gabelmoo Consensus could not be retrieved maatuska Consensus could not be retrieved faravahar Consensus could not be retrieved longclaw Consensus could not be retrieved bastet Consensus could not be retrieved When I try http://authorityip:dirport/tor/status-vote/current/consensus.z it's 'failed: Operation timed out' What works is: http://relayip:dirport/tor/status-vote/current/consensus.z Am I missing something and is everything good? A glitch? -- Cheers, Felix

2 1

Exit node on Contabo
by Nuno Rego 05 Jan '21

05 Jan '21

> Short experience at Contabo. After 10 days, and after the first abuse complaint of. > > " > Dear Mr Rego, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Generally, it is not denied to use TOR nodes on our services. However, in case it cannot be ensured that those services will not be misused, we have to ask to remove the service from our network. We also included a rule in our terms of services, please see here: > > § 10 Limitation regarding content > > (5) The Provider reserves the right to immediately suspend of any server or webspace package on which any kind of proxy service, such as VPN or TOR, is operated, for which the Provider has knowledge of abuse or fraudulent or unlawful use. > > Please come back within given time frame (you still have 18 hours left) and confirm that you have removed the TOR node. After that we can close this abuse case. > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > If you have any questions or need help, please do not hesitate to contact us. > > -- > Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > Anneli Ulfig > Kundenservice / Customer support > > Contabo GmbH > Aschauer Straße 32a > 81549 München > https://contabo.com> " > > Cumprimentos; -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com

3 2

Info from my ISP about investigation of tor exits
by Olaf Grimm 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

Here is the original of mail (in copy) from my provider Mail copy: "Hello, Unfortunately your traffic type is full of unwanted events not compatible with our company ethic. Since the first date of activity we've received many abuse reports regarding bruteforce, layer7 attacks, hacking and many others. Currently there is a police investigation regarding one of the 2 servers related to hacking activity against an european country security. The access and content is in interpol custody and we have a restriction on reactivation. Kind regards, George Oprea 24/7 Technical Support Zetservers.com /Romania" --> My answer: Thank you for your information. Good luck. I change my other servers to less trouble. (Change Exits to Relay) Olaf

4 3

Should I worry about sudden swings in connection numbers to my relay?
by torix＠protonmail.com 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

Dear List, One of my exits, which has been up for 6 months now with an average of 2000 to 4000 connections, since yesterday has been jumping up to 10,000, 8,000, then back to 3500 or so. My history is a simple test file of date and connection numbers taken every 5 minutes: Sun Jan 3 07:20:00 MSK 2021 3233 Sun Jan 3 07:25:00 MSK 2021 3342 Sun Jan 3 07:30:00 MSK 2021 9679 Sun Jan 3 07:35:00 MSK 2021 3455 Sun Jan 3 07:40:00 MSK 2021 6800 Sun Jan 3 07:45:00 MSK 2021 3402 Sun Jan 3 07:50:00 MSK 2021 3346 Sun Jan 3 07:55:00 MSK 2021 3355 Sun Jan 3 08:00:00 MSK 2021 3358 Sun Jan 3 08:05:00 MSK 2021 10067 Sun Jan 3 08:10:00 MSK 2021 3343 ----------------- TIA, --Torix Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

1 0

Info from my ISP about investigation of tor exits - Update
by Olaf Grimm 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

Exit-IPs: Please block these Exits /Relays 89.34.27.149, active 89.34.27.43 , "supended" in panel, but active. Warning! 89.34.27.48, active 89.34.27.49, active (89.34.27.59 since some days terminated) (89.34.27.37 since some week terminated)

2 1

event.reasons for ORStatus.CLOSED
by Toralf Förster 01 Jan '21

01 Jan '21

I wrote a small Pythons script [1] to catch the event.reasons for ORStatus.CLOSED. The output is something like this: orstatus.py --ctrlport 9051 DONE FAF3236D37B0B18D8438C46317940F642E296924 IOERROR 917A0A924DA50B46CD740924AB42B237A831E182 DONE DCEA2A6D8034E164A4FFDD8AFF997E2F6FB2ECF8 50.7.179.202 443 v4 0.4.4.5 IOERROR CDE4149F0DC65A7BE1AE440340BE1C7A18135E29 192.250.236.130 80 v4 0.4.4.6 DONE 24E2F139121D4394C54B5BCC368B3B411857C413 204.13.164.118 443 v4 0.4.4.6 DONE 24E2F139121D4394C54B5BCC368B3B411857C413 204.13.164.118 443 v4 0.4.4.6 IOERROR 8A51DC1ACBBC411E3B4D124F44A98F5ADC6A8984 IOERROR 57C799B990D61FB49E22E792670F5B28FE2E7FEA A stat over a day or so showed that the majority of systems have 0-10 IOERRORS whereas there're few dozen systems failing all the time and having 100x more IOERRORS in the same time frame. I do wonder however whether such a statistics is capable to give a senseful answer if a relay itself behaves well or not? [1] https://github.com/toralf/torutils/blob/master/orstatus.py -- Toralf

1 0

attacks from problematic tor exit relays
by BRBfGWMz 31 Dec '20

31 Dec '20

I am trying to guess what kind of target attacks are possible through problematic relays. Suppose the network relay is controlled by the enemy. How do they determine the original IP address of the outbound traffic? Correlation attacks are possible, but they seem very difficult and probably require a lot of resources. Also, changing the route stops this. If I assume that they determine what traffic flow is mine, and that I always use the same route, what attacks are possible? Are there any good posts or videos? \-- Sent using MsgSafe.io's Free Plan Private, encrypted, online communication For everyone. https://www.msgsafe.io

2 1

Relay operators meetup @ rC3
by Stefan Leibfarth 31 Dec '20

31 Dec '20

Hello Tor friends and relay operators, I haven't heard of a relay operators meetup at the ongoing rC3. Are there any plans? If not, who of you is interested? It would be my pleasure arrange a session. Please get back to me. Cheers Leibi

7 8

Re: [tor-relays] Relay operators meetup @ rC3: today 22:00 UTC+1
by BRBfGWMz 30 Dec '20

30 Dec '20

Do you guys meet via video? Is there a calendar? On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 01:39 PM, kantorkel <kantorkel(a)hamburg.freifunk.net> wrote: > To avoid confusion: We will meet today at 21:00 UTC, that is 22:00 CET > > https://www.starts-at.com/event/2603308559 > > > > On 12/29/20 12:30 PM, kantorkel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > the meetup will take place today, 2020-12-29, at 10pm UTC+1. > > > In rC3 world, we will meet in the bottom right corner of the Jena > hackerspace "Krautspace" > (https://rc3.world/rc3/room/5edc1329-f55c-46e1-a739-b0d642c2c80f/) Please > use https://jitsi.rc3.world/torrelayops-724b5 to join from the outside > world. > > > Thanks to qbi for organizing the room. > > > Best > > kantorkel > > > On 12/27/20 10:54 PM, Stefan Leibfarth wrote: > >> Hello Tor friends and relay operators, > >> > >> I haven't heard of a relay operators meetup at the ongoing rC3. > >> Are there any plans? > >> If not, who of you is interested? > >> > >> It would be my pleasure arrange a session. > >> Please get back to me. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Leibi > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > \-- Sent using MsgSafe.io's Free Plan Private, encrypted, online communication For everyone. https://www.msgsafe.io

1 0

M1 anyone?
by niftybunny 29 Dec '20

29 Dec '20

With one of my servers down and giving me brain cancer … anyone tried to run relays on the new M1 chip? Is it even officially supported right now? Anyone any idea how much it could push? cheers, nifty

2 1

SSH
by Андрей Гвоздев 29 Dec '20

29 Dec '20

Hello I'm running a TOR relay, every time I SSH to my server I see a message that there were thousands of failed login attempts Do you see this message too?

10 12

Bridge acting strange
by enrollado 29 Dec '20

29 Dec '20

I have noticed some bizarre behavior on one of my relays. I logged into the server hosting particlefive (bridge) on November 15 and noticed that the tor process had crashed (not a clean exit). I had accounting set up, so it had hibernated from 11/07 00:00 UTC to 11/07 00:44 UTC. After that, it appeared to be running normally, but it crashed sometime after 11/07 06:25 UTC. I don't have crash dumps enabled, so I don't have any information on the crash. I restarted it and it appeared to have been working normally. I checked on it again on the 16th and all was well. On December 2nd, it suddenly stopped receiving client connections. According to the metrics page, it hasn't passed any traffic since then, though the logs show 20 - 60 GB per heartbeat interval. The log rotation has gone strange as well. As of today: notices.log - 12/29 06:25 to 12/29 12:20 notices.log.1 - 12/28 06:25 to 12/29 06:20 notices.log.2 - 11/06 06:25 to 11/07 06:25 notices.log.3 - 12/26 06:25 to 12/27 06:25 notices.log.4 - 12/25 06:25 to 12/26 06:25 notices.log.5 - 12/23 06:25 to 12/24 06:25 So, the log from the day before the crash is still hanging around with no unusual activity shown, and I'm missing the log file for 12/24. At this point, it seems to be running normally, but it is not receiving any new connections. Yesterday, I changed the configuration from accounting to bandwidth limiting, so notices.log.1 has the hup I sent to reload the configuration. However, notices.log.3 also shows a hup signal at 06:25 UTC that I did not send. I should probably report this on the tor-dev list, but moderation on that list appears to be pretty slow, and this list is more active. I was wondering if anyone else has seen this kind of odd activity on a bridge before. My paranoia alarm is in yellow status, so I'm about to dump this relay, get a new IP, and start over. Any advice is appreciated. No me preguntas nada, no te digo una mentira. Enrollado Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

1 0

Tor Traffic De-prioritization Script
by tontu 29 Dec '20

29 Dec '20

Hello all, I recently acquired a server with "unlimited" (not unmetered) bandwidth on a non-Hetzner/OVH/Scaleway network, but the pipe is just 100mbit (and will be saturated at some points by personal traffic bursts). That being said, I expect the 100mbit pipe to be idle 90% of the time, so it doesn't seem ideal to just set a low BandwidthRate. The documentation [1] for relay bandwidth shaping options points to a script to de-prioritize Tor traffic to ensure that personal traffic takes precedence. However, the script no longer exists within Tor source code. [2] Is this script now deprecated? If not, where can I find it? If so, what alternative methods might exist to de-prioritize Tor traffic during bursts from personal traffic pipes on Linux or BSD systems? Thanks all! -- Links [1] https://support.torproject.org/operators/bandwidth-shaping/ [2] https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/contrib/operator-tools/linux-tor…

3 2

new installation of an established TOR relay
by RJ Hofmann 28 Dec '20

28 Dec '20

Hello there, caused by a temporary failure of the raspberry I had to completely renew installation of my TOR relay nicknamed mosaik. The new installtion is already up and running, but since I had no copies of keys and fingerprints the new relay is completely new in terms of consensus weight etc.. I wonder if it is helpful in any way to inform you about this change as to accelerate the relay’s „reputation“ to make it fully functional for the community on the fast track. Anyway the relay will work its way up to its former capabilities. The old relay named „mosaik“ (see screenshot) is no longer existing, the new one is now called „kitchenaid“ (see screenshot) and active at its former speed. with best wishes RJH ______________________________ ______________________________

3 2

Re: [tor-relays] new installation of an established TOR relay (RJ Hofmann)
by Wilton Gorske 28 Dec '20

28 Dec '20

Hey RJH, Yep. This has happened to me with my Raspberry Pi too (nickname: mutualaid). Be sure you make a copy somewhere safe of kitchenaid's keys found in /var/lib/tor/keys to pick up where you left off next time. Given the network's extra capacity, I doubt core developers and the community will focus on finding a way to fasttrack a relay's reputation, let alone backing up the private keys in a secure way. It's up to relay operators to create copies of their keys. Alternatively, you can also just do period backups of the entire SD card for the Raspberry Pi relay. Either way, thanks for running one. In solidarity, Wilton tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org: > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:50:03 +0100 > From: RJ Hofmann<cepa(a)weltzustand.de> > To:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: [tor-relays] new installation of an established TOR relay > Message-ID:<04381F44-8483-4ACE-8928-6E008FB885B5(a)weltzustand.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello there, > > caused by a temporary failure of the raspberry I had to completely renew installation of my TOR relay nicknamed mosaik. > > The new installtion is already up and running, but since I had no copies of keys and fingerprints the new relay is completely new in terms of consensus weight etc.. > > I wonder if it is helpful in any way to inform you about this change as to accelerate the relay?s ?reputation? to make it fully functional for the community on the fast track. > > Anyway the relay will work its way up to its former capabilities. > > The old relay named ?mosaik? (see screenshot) is no longer existing, the new one is now called ?kitchenaid? (see screenshot) and active at its former speed. > > with best wishes > RJH > >

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] Help with new relay
by lists＠for-privacy.net 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

On 21.12.2020 08:31, Thomas wrote: > It works fine when I run it as sudo, but according to its output, it > "isn't a good idea, nor should it be necessary." So my first question > is: How do I go about getting Nyx to connect to Tor's control socket > as a standard, non-sudo process? That will be FAQ in this list ;-) You have to add yourself to the Tor user 'debian-tor' group. (_tor-00, _tor-01,... if you set up several instances. see below) adduser user_name group_name or usermod -aG user_name group_name usermod -aG debian-tor user > My second question revolves around running the Tor daemon as a > service. It seems as if, again, I need to run it as root to make it > work, otherwise it gives me permission denied errors. What I want is > to be able to run 2 consecutive nodes on different accounts; that way > I can be more safe and secure while running my relay. If that's able > to happen, how would I go about configuring my relay daemons to be > separate, i.e. where would I put my torrc? Create 2 or more Tor instances: ~$ apt install tor-instances installs a helper script on a Debian or Ubuntu system. On other distributions you have to do all of this by hand what this script does! ~$ systemctl stop tor ~$ tor-instance-create 00 ~$ tor-instance-create 01 ~$ ... ~$ systemctl enable tor@00 ~$ systemctl enable tor@01 ~$ ... ~$ systemctl mask tor@default ~$ nano /etc/tor/instances/00/torrc ~$ nano /etc/tor/instances/01/torrc ~$ ... ~$ systemctl start tor@00 ~$ systemctl start tor@01 ... To see if the tor daemon is running: systemctl status _tor@00 systemctl status _tor@01 or '~$ journalctl -xe' to see if everything is ok I wrote it a little more in detail in the PIVX forum. Ignore the PIVX stuff: https://forum.pivx.org/threads/howto-setup-masternode-or-staker-wallet-behi… -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom!

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay
by BRBfGWMz 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Olaf is right Get a $ 5 per month VPS On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 08:28 AM, Olaf Grimm <jeep665(a)posteo.de> wrote: > Hello Amadeus! > > When you talk about a RasPi, I assume you mean a home location. > Please read the recommendations. Never operate an Exit Relay at home! > It will be expensive if the wrong people knock on the door. > > By the way, for an Exit Relay the bandwidth should already be 10MBit/s > or better. > > Olaf > > Am 15.12.20 um 01:44 schrieb Amadeus Ramazotti: > > hey, > > partly related to original question: > > I'm planning to set up a new exit. My very first relay. I'm planning to > use a small SoC with 2GB ram. Something running on ARM like a raspberry pi. > > > > Is this feasible or even a good idea? > > > > Regards > > > > > > On 14 Dec 2020, at 15:10, torix(a)protonmail.com wrote: > > > > I have several 1 G RAM exits running unbound without a problem. They never > seem to hit swap, either. On FreeBSD: > > last pid: 83973; load averages: 0.86, 0.71, 0.62 up 130+15:44:28 16:02:04 > > 23 processes: 2 running, 21 sleeping > > CPU: 43.1% user, 0.0% nice, 2.7% system, 5.5% interrupt, 48.6% idle > > Mem: 101M Active, 734M Inact, 444M Wired, 151M Buf, 210M Free > > Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free > > > > Go for it, > > > > \--Torix > > > > > > Original Message > >> On Monday, December 14, 2020 1:11 PM, <lists(a)for-privacy.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On 14.12.2020 13:58, lists(a)for-privacy.net wrote: > >>> > >>> grep VmPeak/proc/$PID/status = 181836 kB > >> A non exit has less: > >> grep VmPeak/proc/$PID/status = 57336 kB > >> tor-proxy-02.for-privacy.net ^^ > >> > >> > \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> p_o Ciao Marco! > >> > >> Debian GNU/Linux > >> > >> It's free software and it gives you freedom! > >> > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > \-- Sent using MsgSafe.io's Free Plan Private, encrypted, online communication For everyone. https://www.msgsafe.io

4 4

Help with new relay
by Thomas 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi all! I'm a fairly new relay operator and I have a few questions regarding some of the nitty-gritty setup on Debian. I've set it up a couple times before, but I can't seem to be able to run my relay as non-root. Every time I boot up Nyx without using sudo, it says We were unable to read tor's authentication cookie... Path: /run/tor/control.authcookie Issue: Authentication failed: unable to read '/run/tor/control.authcookie' ([Errno 13] Permission denied: '/run/tor/control.authcookie') It works fine when I run it as sudo, but according to its output, it "isn't a good idea, nor should it be necessary." So my first question is: How do I go about getting Nyx to connect to Tor's control socket as a standard, non-sudo process? My second question revolves around running the Tor daemon as a service. It seems as if, again, I need to run it as root to make it work, otherwise it gives me permission denied errors. What I want is to be able to run 2 consecutive nodes on different accounts; that way I can be more safe and secure while running my relay. If that's able to happen, how would I go about configuring my relay daemons to be separate, i.e. where would I put my torrc? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks! Thomas

1 0

Well, that escalated quickly
by enrollado 17 Dec '20

17 Dec '20

Hello all. I started an exit relay on Saturday. Last night I took a look at the log and I saw something like 30 active circuits at the heartbeat and the relay had passed a few tens of megabytes. I just logged in and saw 8,000 active circuits at the heartbeat and > 2 GB passed. Is it normal for an exit relay to suddenly ramp up like that? Just curious. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

4 3

Authorithy clock skew in consensus health page
by torjoy 16 Dec '20

16 Dec '20

Hi all, Its just a curiosity question... What is the reference source used in comparsions of authorities clock skew in consensus health? Are they synced throught NTP daemons (like chrony or opentpd for example)? TOR can take advange of very accurate timing in the authorities and relays? I know that just few seconds (or miliseconds?) are fine of clock offset. And if the relay's clock has some fluctuation of hundreds of miliseconds? For example going from -100mS of offset to +300mS offset and them to -200 mS offset... I mean, too much clock noise can be a problem for TOR? Best regards, Luiz Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

2 2

Re: [tor-relays] I created a way of running tor relays on Windows easier
by Keifer Bly 16 Dec '20

16 Dec '20

Here it is, thank you. https://github.com/thecomputermaster/TorWrapperWindows/blob/main/WindowsTor… --Keifer On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:39 AM Gisle Vanem <gisle.vanem(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a project I have been working on which allows users to run > relays on Windows with ease. Made this for > > volunteers who want to run relays, but only have Windows. See here > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpk6yvUWQqU > > The link to GoogleDrive cannot be accessed; > " ... in violation of Google's blah-blah .." > > Do you have a Release on Github instead? > > -- > --gv >

1 0

I created a way of running tor relays on Windows easier
by Keifer Bly 16 Dec '20

16 Dec '20

1 0

Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay
by Olaf Grimm 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

Hello! I would like to activate a local DNS resolver with unbound at the exit relays, but I am concerned about the RAM size with 1GB. On an example machine I have 2GB RAM and the exit relay occupies 400MB at 22.9 MiB/s according to the metrics. Does anyone have experience with such values? My smaller exit relays only have 1GB of RAM. Well, there is still the problem that simply trying it out is not possible. If I overrun the RAM and it comes to SWAP activities, then already on a local machine almost no access was possible. With a VPS this is a no-go. Kind regards! Olaf

8 11