- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Onion Tip Uptime?
by Sebastian Urbach 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

On March 8, 2015 3:13:29 PM Corey Wood <corky(a)corky.me.uk> wrote: Hi Corey, > Hi all, i've been noticing over the last few days oniontip.com has been > flaky. As I'm writing this the site is down again. Does anyone have > contact with some of the developers, because it's a really cool project > and I want to know what's going on Main dev is Donncha O'Cearbhaill and he is a member of this list. You can reach him here: donncha(a)donncha.is Donncha, if you need hardware / bandwidth then please just say so. I hereby volunteer :-) Im sure that most Ops want to see oniontip up and running. -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic.

2 2

Consensus dropped after 0.2.6.3-alpha upgrade
by relayops＠mail2tor.com 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

Any ideas why? Slowly dropped after upgrading. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/113FCC01A29B4600A8BAA1CB72E6AB1FD899A…

2 2

Onion Tip Uptime?
by Corey Wood 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

Hi all, i've been noticing over the last few days oniontip.com has been flaky. As I'm writing this the site is down again. Does anyone have contact with some of the developers, because it's a really cool project and I want to know what's going on. Corey Wood

1 0

multi tor instance support for startup scripts
by Nusenu 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I just filed two tickets to add support for multiple tor instances to the official deb/rpm packages. I think this is useful for many relay operators (so they don't have to replace the init scripts themselves anymore). https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14995 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14996 another ticket for tor alpha users: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14997 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU6zp8AAoJEFv7XvVCELh0mIQP/06x9Ag6N3bb+RxTyt41x8TV lEIcX9JzROZoCHS+bO17BavAHMFJiCRBbCahqT5XHMbE/aXaW0bKP7cjstZxZkxJ uGEXot8z8m3x5YVtb2a5taFwD0wjIJZJBTR0+kJ6waFvs/z7Zh04dRtvXMc9SXeJ gMCGVByIJlJQgdb3CVKgqWSlfiaYrblyY8r7YXu540Qm73yuDcVEVPvH+rudxMot hiDHD/AgC2mgfjzhJSiBCThAakWuBzm/xEDsnJxqQUQL27FYhbCGR49rTxx5rZqx X6+HaZXyvjEh/EkCbevpfNgo4WGAKdGrGTUCzTssPjT9CchqUMRrZAlTe/vpNZpR NuMnKT0z3DFQDO4qsUtplNzSBUmrGTanDqQOnGxMBwcBajx9pWFJsnozb7OBU1LR FL1RJAeZfC7TQUa0r/6/V9gbXrPSoZsI5rK3sSZSa8yLu/OUBRXk4gK36/NXO0at Fq1tM48PNIVolkU/hhb3iYFiyU3d2Qng79iGGzO7mo3/OPsqVKASie6USsiVSDmh nu2IzpXzHKO6+iI3pOn4t6UoEJG2oKmpirH1LhfNKmcJMsH8dLLYDsJWoSKjwfNG ereJB6/0b47sirXUHIPPAXhxEgCW0U26PfUlIvYEjLQ924FgIkjMKfilJJnJXI9O lA8Rpo6ziL6MTcMYkjRX =JmDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 13

Re: [tor-relays] 0.2.5.10 / 0.2.6.x and ticket 9682
by Sebastian Urbach 07 Mar '15

07 Mar '15

On March 6, 2015 11:32:01 PM Tom van der Woerdt <info(a)tvdw.eu> wrote: Hi Tom, > Sebastian Urbach schreef op 06/03/15 om 21:52: > > Dear list members, > > > > I hope that some of you compared 0.2.5.10 with 0.2.6.x regarding the > > performance (ticket 9682). How big/small is the difference in the wild ? > > I would appreciate it if someone with Linux / BSD could say a few words ;-) > > > > Hi Sebastian, > > As far as I can tell the change happened between 0.2.6.2 and 0.2.6.3 so > I'll describe the performance difference between those. You're right, got 0.2.5.10 stuck in my head because it's the last stable release ;-) The patch came up with 0.2.6.3, indeed. > > Just had a look on a server of mine that is bottlenecked by the CPU. I > noticed that there was indeed a big drop in CPU usage. However, there > was also a similar drop in network usage, most likely caused by the > restart. It took about a week to fully recover to normal levels. > > It is incredibly hard to tell from the data whether there was a big > performance difference as a direct result of the 0.2.6.2->0.2.6.3 > upgrade. It's definitely not going to be a 10% improvement, as far as I > can tell. Hard to tell pretty much says it all :-( Not much of a change. Now the multithread feature becomes the last hope :-) > > Despite my nodes all running with 'NumCPUs 2', none of the worker queues > seem to be doing much : > > $ ps H -o etime,time,args -u toranon | grep node2 > 3-01:46:17 1-20:35:33 /usr/bin/tor -f /etc/tor/torrc-node2 > 3-01:46:13 00:17:09 /usr/bin/tor -f /etc/tor/torrc-node2 > 3-01:46:13 00:17:09 /usr/bin/tor -f /etc/tor/torrc-node2 > > If those threads are what the patch addressed, I'm afraid it's not going > to have a massive impact. > > In case it's relevant: these measurements are taken from an exit relay > with two processes each doing ~150Mbit/s (x2 if you count up+down). > > Upgrade was done at 2015-02-24 21:26, relevant graphs : > * cpu: > http://www.imgdumper.nl/uploads8/54fa2a823bc62/54fa2a823434f-cpu.png > * network: > http://www.imgdumper.nl/uploads8/54fa2a8ce3db5/54fa2a8cdd05c-if_eth1.png Thanks gor your reply, domehow i expected it zo be more of a boost after reading Nick's text: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/coming-tor-026 -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic.

2 1

0.2.5.10 / 0.2.6.x and ticket 9682
by Sebastian Urbach 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

Dear list members, I hope that some of you compared 0.2.5.10 with 0.2.6.x regarding the performance (ticket 9682). How big/small is the difference in the wild ? I would appreciate it if someone with Linux / BSD could say a few words ;-) -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic.

2 1

Ports 443 and 80 are open, but 443 not Tor reachable
by oseump 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

Thank you very much for your suggestion which pointed me in the right direction. It was my router that was grabbing port 443. A very helpful page on the Draytek website explains how to forward TCP Port 443 - for SSL VPN models. I had asked Virgin Media about running Tor and no objection was raised. I was told they do not block any ports.. Again, many thanks.

5 4

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?
by relay_acab＠openmailbox.org 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

> I wrote this recently: > > https://gist.github.com/plsql/49e642d5bce835df2946 > > Thanks so much for considering security! It's a very important and > often > neglected aspect of Tor relay operation. > > Let me know what you think of the document. > > Libertas I just started to look at it, but it seems to be EXACTLY what I was looking for. Thank you so much! +-- relayacab +--

1 0

Legal Troubles
by Thomas White 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I am just doing some planning for my own exits at the moment and researching the legal provisions and experience for a variety of jurisdictions. If anyone has any experience of raids as a result of running a Tor relay or other legal troubles, I'd appreciate it if you got in touch (privately preferably) for a quick chat. Of course any information supplied will be kept anonymous unless you are explicitly happy to make a statement openly about it. Sharing our experiences will certainly help us understand the climate much better. Regards, T - -- Activist, anarchist and a bit of a dreamer. Keybase: https://keybase.io/thomaswhite PGP Keys: https://www.thecthulhu.com/pgp-keys/ Current Fingerprint: BA81 407C BD61 CD15 E5D9 ADA9 5FA2 426F F34E 0FD4 Master Fingerprint: DDEF AB9B 1962 5D09 4264 2558 1F23 39B7 EF10 09F0 Twitter: @CthulhuSec XMPP: thecthulhu at jabber.ccc.de XMPP-OTR: 4321B19F A9A3462C FE64BAC7 294C8A7E A53CC966 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU9wF8AAoJEF+iQm/zTg/ULJcQAJsrVYjdBpXiIGKcN7fFuDzm RqttupBoTifsKpWfX46lgnSAquZQ6qDMqT2zBZ0fe7fni1vfp/E9bld8ryLTLvoK to47exo08HLj+9H6ZaVwirdRC94GHYOViCE/4BMm0VWEXrFww5ytAuCrukhIzK/Z QS/Lgu3tI/BubHS02hkI5sZNO9Ej9T4wlYREyRdldI7j4zBP/FhQCEfJY5g0U3gb AnW2Go+ItINuFLsccr9m/uCuIwBz6o/WNHgLp8B4wU2T9hvWNxc/h1P5Y9l5RrWx N9/wgCT1K8Dw8OjvdfUchzbcOQo8C+1aWbYPy0eK7v+5V8PyCrU4DGtvJRO36iNV TcpxXRFcsAjOGYOo1bMDF6g2sLj3T22zoS76BNTtq7F7i1JDkDHY3j2uXHG0Ex2j hPVFsjHDr4+qqfS98knW4bpLjEOnYZUMrvuSE5iQG1ngMqFV1mpWZVHbWQozL3cb ZXm9kxY9HeVCwyc4a2V+TWY2QvYIaVaMTaXyUfh8lOTshrnPV3KagLozaaAWHS/u KFEbDfF0iJFD6muvxbu0yVRsIcrkPryJDjlGcbxH3pKEntaZgXVK/MJB6X/TLNsI l2KC4OlCeW2sScNc9epiAy15HgNswWvKbwM6WjreNf+sbZ/7vvSrLcNXdzoRHBwt +evkDqeeobkhAWPMlBU+ =vv6k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Ports 443 and 80 are open, but 443 not Tor reachable
by oseump 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hello everyone, this is my first post, and would be very grateful for help. My Tor relay (0.2.5.10 and now compiled from source) has had a checkered history since I installed it, first on an Efika MX in December (which proved unstable), and then on a Raspberry Pi model 2 (Linux 3.18.8-v7+) starting a couple or so weeks ago. In trying to follow recommendations, and wanting to be helpful to less fortunate souls, I changed from the usual ORPort 9001 and DirPort 9030 (which worked) to ports 443 and 80 respectively. I now know that this is a pathway to misery and sorrow. With ORPort 443 Tor could not confirm the port was reachable even though it was wide open to online port checkers and nmap -sT -O localhost shows ports 22/tcp, 80/tcp, 443/tcp to be open. And yet torstatus monitors show many relays displaying ports ORPOrt 443 and DirPort 80 running on Linux. Yesterday I swapped the ports and within a moment ORPort 80 was confirmed and server descriptor published. DirPort 443 fails to confirm it is reachable. sudo iptables -L -nv Chain INPUT (policy DROP 4328 packets, 200K bytes)  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination  144K   60M ACCEPT     all  --  lo     *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0   91861   23M ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp dpt:80  4711 1087K ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp dpt:443 1497K  202M ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       192.168.1.0/24       0.0.0..0/0       0     0 ACCEPT     icmp --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            icmptype 8 1221K 1521M ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            state RELATED,ESTABLISHED Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 2929K packets, 1979M bytes)  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination So what is it about port 443 on my little RP 2 that Tor dislikes?

2 1

New relay operator. Basic security practices?
by relay_acab＠openmailbox.org 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hello all. I'm running a new relay, relayacab, at apexy in DE on a minimal Debian 7 OS. Is there a best practices guide for basic security setup? This is my first time operating a remote machine, running a relay, and having any public service to harden. So I'd really like to take this opportunity to do this the right way and continue on a productive path in supporting the tor network. Thanks! +-- relayacab +-- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/18002B828F1E9237B616DE8C8968F4E6C7520…

3 2

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?
by JusticeRage 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

This email ( link to the blog post ) was powted a while ago on the Full Disclosure mailing list. Some of the advice only applies to Desktop computers, but I find it's still a very good read in the general case. -- Justicerage ???----- Original Message ----- ????From: "Joshua Rogers" <megamansec(a)gmail.com> To: fulldisclosure(a)seclists.org Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 7:22:14 PM Subject: [FD] Securing Ubuntu-Desktop From the Bad-Guys, and the Good-Guys. ?????Securing Ubuntu-Desktop From the Bad-Guys, and the Good-Guys. Securing your Ubuntu Desktop OS from intruders Recently I have become interested in securing my laptop from predators such as hackers, thieves, and law enforcement. To do this, I've explored various programs to run; and how to run them, without interrupting usability by the average user. In this blog we'll be running through vectors of attacks that one could use to gain access to your unencrypted data. Before starting, the following must be known: 1. The author of this article is currently running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS(Trusty), and all commands and patches work on it for the author. The author accepts no liability when it comes to these commands/patches being run by other users; this is purely informational. 2. It is assumed Full-Disk-Encryption is being used. 3. It is assumed your $HOME directory is encrypted using ecryptfs, with filenames encrypted. This can be checked using the command `ecryptfs-verify -h -e' 4. It is assumed you do not have the evil program called Java, or any of its counterparts like IcedTea, etc. installed. When you're told to run the program 'Nano', you can use vim,vi,emacs, etc. Nano is purely the text editor that I use. To exit out of Nano, you press control-x. FireWire attacks Firewire has for awhile been known to allow attackers to gain access to a computer's Physical memor[RAM], and enable the attacker to grab the encryption key used for devices that are mounted. The most obvious method of defeating this attack is by not compiling the kernel with any firewire modules included, but for the sake of this article, I'll include methods of mitigation. After all, some Ubuntu users probably wouldn't be able to compile their own kernel every update. To mitigate the risks with firewire, we will disable them in a blacklist file in modprobe.d. 1. Open up /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire.conf by running `sudo nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire.conf' 2. Remove the contents(or comment everything out) and replace it with the following: ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |# Prevent automatic loading of firewire module(s).| |blacklist ohci1394| |blacklist sbp2| |blacklist dv1394| |blacklist raw1394| |blacklist video1394| |blacklist firewire-ohci| |blacklist firewire-sbp2| |blacklist firewire-core| |blacklist firewire-net| |blacklist firewire-serial| |# Prevent manual loading of firewire module(s).| |install ohchi1394 false| |install sbp2 false| |install dv1394 false| |install raw1394 false| |install video1394 false| |install firewire-ohci false| |install firewire-sbp2 false| |install firewire-core false| |install firewire-net false| |install firewire-serial false| This will 1. blacklist all the firewire modules from starting at boot, and 2. prevent loading of firewire through forceful techniques. After doing this, you *must* run `sudo update-initramfs -k all -u' for it to take effect on next boot. Hardening Firefox The abilities of web-browsers are not only astounding, but also extremely vulnerable. With 0-day exploits being found for nearly everything, the bad guys are always looking for ways to exploit your browser. Methods used to exploit browsers are usually split up into two parts: exploiting the actual browser, and exploiting addon(such as Adblock and Acrobat Reader). Using the method I describe should mitigate most, if not all techniques involved in the exploitation of Firefox, and addons used. Most services when installed create a user for themselves, where they cannot escape from without some sort of local root kernel exploit. Unlike services, firefox is normally run at the same permissions as the user running it, which entails an attacker to be able to gain the same permissions of the user. With access, an attacker could record the keystrokes of the user, and wait until they run 'sudo' to gain root access(or, god forbid, somebody has nopasswd enabled on their account.) By creating a user specifically for firefox, we lock it into its own folder where it [shouldn't be able to] escape. First off, we want to create our new user called 'firefox'. 1. Run 'sudo adduser --system --quiet --shell /bin/false --group --disabled-password --disabled-login firefox' in the terminal. The commandline(and all references to) 'firefox' is a link to /usr/bin/firefox, which is just a launcher script, so we can move that to something like 'firefox-start'. 2. Run `sudo mv /usr/bin/firefox /usr/bin/firefox-start' in the terminal. Now we want to recreate the firefox file, and make it execute as our 'firefox' user, with all of the parameters that it normally would. To do this, we must make a script to be run when using the command 'firefox'. We have two options here. We either make a very simple script to run Firefox as the 'firefox' user, or we use some X11 trickery. The problem with the first, is that an experienced hacker could control *all* X11 activity. Including logging keystrokes, injecting keystrokes, taking screenshots, etc. The problem with the second, is that extensions such as XRANDR will not work. Another highly problematic downside is that you cannot copy-and-paste from your browser into another application. You can copy-and-paste from other applications into the browser, but not the other way around. This makes it incredibly difficult if you want to copy, for example, a quote from Wikipedia into an email. Due to not having a solution to this, I've decided to show you how to do both. ----- Vulnerable Method This method gives the reader a very easy way of doing things, and is probably OK for the average user. Open up /usr/bin/firefox, which should now be an empty file, and place a script in it so it will run firefox was the user 'firefox'. 3[.1]. sudo nano /usr/bin/firefox And enter the script: ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 2 |#!/bin/bash| |sudo -H -u firefox ||"/usr/bin/firefox-start"| |"$@"| The -H flag is used to tell the system that we want to set our home directory to /home/firefox/. -u is used to tell the system that we want to run the program as the user 'firefox', and the last two flags tell the system to run /usr/bin/firefox-start(the REAL firefox script) with the flags $@, which means it will run with whatever /usr/bin/firefox was run with. We need to allow the 'firefox' user to access X, so we go to "System -> Preferences -> Startup Applications" and add a new startup program. The name and comment is irrelevant, but the command should be this: ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 |xhost +SI:localuser:firefox| ----- 'Paranoid' Method This method, as stated above, stops the user from copy-and-pasting from the browser into a different program. It is much more safe, and is considered secure. 3[.2]. Run `sudo nano /usr/bin/firefox', and put in.. ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |#!/bin/bash| |xa=||"/home/firefox/.Xauthority"| |exec| |newgrp firefox <<-EOF| | ||if| |[ -e ||"$xa"| |]; then| | ||if| |[ ! -r ||"$xa"| |]; then| | ||rm -f ||"$xa"| | ||elif [ ! -w ||"$xa"| |]; then| | ||mv ||"$xa"| |"$xa.tmp"| |&& cp ||"$xa.tmp"| |"$xa"| |&& rm -f ||"$xa.tmp"| |&& ||chmod| |660 ||"$xa"| | ||fi| | ||fi &&| | ||xauth -q -i -f ||"$xa"| |generate ||"$DISPLAY"| |. ||"untrusted"| |&& ||chmod| |g+rw ||"$xa"| |&&| | ||sudo -H -u firefox XAUTHORITY=||"$xa"| |"/usr/bin/firefox-start"| |"$@"| |EOF| This script will run every time you open up firefox. Now we need to make the file executable. [4]. Run `sudo chmod +x /usr/bin/firefox'. As you can see in the script, it relies on the usage of the 'newgrp' program being able to access the 'firefox' group. To do this, you must add yourself into the 'firefox' group. [5]. Run `sudo useradd -a -G firefox $USER'. This will add you into the group of 'firefox'. You will now need to reboot to make this come into effect. To allow changes to be made by groups, you must run a chmod command on the user folder. [6]. Run `chmod -R g+rwxs ~firefox' This allows anybody in the 'firefox' group is make changes in the /home/firefox/ directory. ----- Now you can run 'firefox', and it'll run the browser as the user 'firefox', not as your user. Yay! We got most likely the hardest part finished. Audio I, like many of you probably do, like to play music in my browser. Whether it be through HTML5, or Flash. But since our new user 'firefox' isn't part of the 'audio' group, we must add ourselves to it. [?]. Run `sudo usermod -a -G audio firefox' Now with another reboot(or logout), audio should be able to be played. Finally, due to multiple users using PULSE(your account, and then flash in the 'firefox' user), we have to set up 'firefox' to use a slave server, and your real user as the master. First of all, we want to copy the default pulseaudio settings to your home directory. [?]. Run `mkdir ~/.pulse/ ; cp /etc/pulse/default.pa ~/.pulse/' Now edit it. [?]. Run `nano ~/.pulse/default.pa' Add to the bottom of the file: "load-module module-native-protocol-tcp auth-ip-acl=127.0.0.1" and save. And that's it. Firefox will automatically use use that as a master server, thus becoming a slave. There are probably security implications to do with this, but they would be minor.(At most, listening to microphone, which I doubt anyways) Addons Although mostly un-important, it might interest some people to install some addons in Firefox to enhance your browsing privacy. These include: Adblock Edge <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/> - Basically AdBlock without the whitelisted ads. Removes ads & unwanted elements on webpages. Recommend using https://www.fanboy.co.nz/ <https://www.fanboy.co.nz/>in conjunction too. HTTPS-Everywhere <https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere> - Trys to use HTTPS/SSL on webpages known to work with them. BetterPrivacy <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/> - Handles long-term, non-HTTP cookies such as flash cookies.(In options, make sure 'Always ask' is unchecked.) User Agent Switcher <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/> - Makes it possible for you to change your User-Agent to something else. Download http://techpatterns.com/downloads/firefox/useragentswitcher.xml and import it through the application in Firefox(Edit User-Agents). Smart Referer<https://www.blogger.com/> - Only sets referrer if staying on the same page. In the page "about:addons"(type it into your URL-bar), go to "Plugins", and make sure everything is set to "Ask to Activate". In the page "about:config"(type it into your URL-bar), set geo.enabled to false(double click on it if it's true), set network.dns.disablePrefetch to true, set network.websocket.enabled to false, MAC-Address Although not necessarily a security risk, your MAC Address may be used for tracking, and later identification. To do this, we use an interesting program called macchanger <https://github.com/alobbs/macchanger>. Macchanger, created by "Alvaro Lopez Ortega <https://github.com/alobbs>", is a program that quickly and easily spoofs your mac address. Although a new and updated version of macchanger exists on Github, we'll be using the repository's version. We actually need to install macchange. To do so: 1. Run `sudo apt-get install macchanger' Although originally I wanted to set up a script to change the mac address every time you connected to a wireless network, I encountered a problem. The default network manager in Ubuntu, NetworkManager, deprecated pre-up, and post-down. The developers have said that <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/336736> they will not be bringing it back either. Interestingly, many of the commenters on the invalid bug-report page also inquire the removal, as they also were trying to use macchanger. By creating an init script, we can make the program 'macchanger' run on boot. 1. Run `sudo nano /etc/init.d/changemac', and insert the following: ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 |#!/bin/bash| |# Disable the network devices| |ifconfig eth0 down| |ifconfig wlan0 down| |# Spoof the mac addresses| |/usr/bin/macchanger -a eth0| |/usr/bin/macchanger -a wlan0| |# Re-enable the devices| |ifconfig eth0 up| |ifconfig wlan0 up| |exit| |0| Make sure to make it executable(`sudo chmod +x /etc/init.d/changemac'). This script will, on boot, take down wlan0 and eth0, change their mac-addresses, and then bring them back up. If need be, edit eth0 and wlan0 for your respective names on your system. We now must actually the script run on boot. This can be done by running 'update-rc.d'. 2. Run `sudo update-rc.d changemac defaults 10' On each reboot, your mac address should change, without any implications in regard to connectivity. Anti-Viruses It's commonly said by in-experienced users of all distributions that Linux cannot get viruses(Mac users also say this). But in reality, they can get viruses, but it's rare. As described here <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Linuxvirus>, many Linux Trojans/Viruses/Worms have been made, but with little success. Although there is little chance of actually getting one, it's considered a good gesture to others, for you to scan for viruses. -- "If you are going to trade files in a Windows world, you'll need to scan those files for viruses. You won't get infected, but you may help infect someone else." i.e; You may forward an email through your email that contains a windows virus. Some Windows viruses can also be run through Wine. We'll be using ClamAV, an open-source anti-virus program. We first have to install it. 1. Run `sudo apt-get install clamav clamtk clamav-daemon' Once finished installing, we must update our 'AntiVirus definitions'. 2. Run `sudo freshclam' This may take awhile. ClamAV can be run in three ways:Manually in the terminal, manually through a GUI, or as a daemon. I'm going to run it as a GUI. It can be run as a GUI by opening the terminal and typing running `clamtk'. When you open clamtk, you're showed options in regard to how you want to run ClamAV. It's very simple and needs no explanation. You can set up an automatic schedule for scanning in Advanced->Scheduler. Originally, I wanted to make it so that Firefox would scan all downloaded files using ClamAV. I found the addon Fireclam <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fireclam/> which is a Firefox mod that scans downloaded files through ClamAV, and gives you a warning if it returns anything. The problem with it, is that on download, Firefox freezes for 3-5 seconds while the scan is actually going on. This is a huge inconvenience and to me makes it unusable. I'm keeping it up here purely to show that it exists. ClamAV can also be set-up with Thunderbird. *Note: ClamAV does _not_ delete any files. That's up to you. It purely notifies you to the existence.** * DNSCrypt Something a lot of people don't realize is that DNS is completely unencrypted. We're going to add encryption which will prevent spying. To do this, we're going to use OpenDNS's <http://www.opendns.com/about/innovations/dnscrypt/>DNSCrypt <http://dnscrypt.org/>. So, we want to download the current version, dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0 <http://download.dnscrypt.org/dnscrypt-proxy/dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0.tar.bz2>. 1. Run `sudo add-apt-repository ppa:shnatsel/dnscrypt' 2. Run `sudo apt-get update' 3. Run `software-properties-gtk', go to "Other Software", and tick the source-code option for shnatsel/dnscrypt. Now we want to confirm that the ppa is actually secure. To do this.. 4. Run `sudo apt-get source --download-only dnscrypt-proxy' Generate a SHA256 signature for the source. 5. Run `sha256sum dnscrypt-proxy_1.4.0.orig.tar.bz2' Pull the official signature from the DNSCrypt website. 6. Run `dig +short +dnssec TXT dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0.tar.bz2.download.dnscrypt.org' Now compare the results. If they're the same, you're ready to go. Now actually installing, and setting everything up. 7. Run `sudo apt-get install dnscrypt-proxy' 8. Run `nm-connection-editor', and edit your connection. Go to IPv4 Settings and select 'Automatic (DHCP) addresses only' for the "Method". In the DNS servers, set it to: 127.0.0.2 This will make it so that by default, 127.0.0.2 is used for DNS. Due to a bug(?) in apparmor, you must run the following commands: 9. Run `sudo apt-get install apparmor-utils ; sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dnscrypt-proxy' Now to setup dnscrypt, and make it start on startup. 10. Run `sudo nano /etc/init.d/dnscrypt' and put in: ? <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.htm…> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 |#!/bin/sh| |# This is ||for| |the file /etc/init.d/dnscrypt| |### BEGIN INIT INFO| |# Provides: dnscrypt| |# Required-Start: ||$all| |# Required-Stop: ||$all| |# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5| |# Default-Stop: 0 1 6| |# Short-Description: DNSCrypt ||for| |OpenDNS| |# Description: Launch the dnscrypt to communicate with OpenDNS| |### ||END| |INIT INFO| |DAEMON=||"/usr/sbin/dnscrypt-proxy"| |NAME=||"dnscrypt"| |dnscrypt_start()| |{| | ||echo| |"Starting dnscrypt"| | ||dnscrypt-proxy -u nobody -R opendns --local-port=53 --local-address=127.0.0.2 --daemonize | |}| |dnscrypt_stop()| |{| | ||echo| |"Stopping dnscrypt"| | ||start-stop-daemon --oknodo --stop --quiet --retry=0/3/KILL/3 --||exec| |"$DAEMON"| |> /dev/null| |}| |case| |"$1"| |in| | ||start)| | ||dnscrypt_start| | ||;;| | ||stop)| | ||dnscrypt_stop| | ||;;| | ||restart|force-reload)| | ||dnscrypt_stop| | ||dnscrypt_start| | ||;;| | ||*)| | ||echo| |"Usage: /etc/init.d/$NAME {start|stop|restart|force-reload}"| |>&2| | ||exit| |1| | ||;;| |esac| |exit| |0| 11. Run `sudo chmod +x /etc/init.d/dnscrypt', and `sudo update-rc.d dnscrypt defaults'. Finally, we must edit /etc/default/dnscrypt-proxy. 12. Run `sudo nano /etc/default/dnscrypt-proxy' Make sure that the "local-address" is set to "127.0.0.2:53", "resolvconf" is set to "on", and "user" is set to "nobody", And then reboot. Now you'll be resolving with encryption. You can confirm you're using it correctly by going to http://www.opendns.com/welcome/. You can also run `sudo tcpdump -i any -n -A 208.67.220.220', which will display the ASCII output of the packets going in/out of port 443(since it uses port 443, not 53). You can then run `dig debug.opendns.com' in another terminal, and you should see encrypted text through tcpdump. Make sure that /nonexistent exists, and is chowned to nobody:nogroup(`sudo sudo chown nobody:nogroup /nonexistent') *Evil-Maid Attacks*** I won't be covering prevention of evil-maid attacks in this post due to the limitation of what one can actually do to prevent against an evil-maid attack. However, one example of what you can do is moving the boot partition in Ubuntu to a secure USB stick. A guide on how to do this can be found here <http://newspaint.wordpress.com/2013/11/30/moving-linux-boot-partition-to-us…>. But in reality, if somebody is able to tamper with your computer while it's not in your possession, they could install a hardware keylogger <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_keylogger> to get your encryption key. ColdBoot Attacks Again, I won't be covering much when it comes to coldboot attacks. Most computers these days use DDR3 ram, which as far as I can find, aren't vulnerable to coldboot attacks. I will however give recommendations to stop the theoretical attack. 1. Set an Administrator password for the BIOS. Although this wouldn't help if an attacker were to take the ram out of your system, and put it into theirs then dump it, it will delay how long it takes for the ram to be dumped. 2. Turn off Quickboot/Fastboot in your BIOS. Not all computers support this, but some do. By turning off Quickboot/Fastboot, your system will 'check' the memory on boot, thus overwriting everything. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Unrelated * * *File Removal* As most readers will know, deleting files through usual methods(and the command `rm') only remove the "links" to the files contents on the harddrive. To remove files securely, you can use the program BleachBit <http://bleachbit.sourceforge.net/>. You can install it by running `sudo apt-get install bleachbit'. To securely delete a file, run `bleachbit -s file.txt'. It can also be used on directories. Once of the problems with 'secure file removal', is that it only 'securely'(?) deletes the current contents of files. If the file has been edited at all, then reminisce of it may still exist. <http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V5DA2D3vF0o/U5w-W2eH8VI/AAAAAAAAAJk/ty-v0Wgzmcc/s…> Credit: BleachBit This diagram explains it well; using secure removal tools, only the green blocks would be removed. The red blocks are old versions of the files. To deal with this, and delete all un-used disk space, you can use BleachBit as a cleaner. To do this, you can run `sudo bleachbit -o -c system.free_disk_space'. *NOTE:* This will take a long time to use your harddrive. It creates a file with random data that fills up the harddrive, then deletes it. If you're using an SSD, *_DO NOT_* use this. Bleachbit can also be used for other things. you can view them by running `bleachbit --gui'. With all of these security measures implemented, I am confident that my computer is fairly secure from external, and remote hackers. It's much more of a hobbyist thing. If you really need good secure, use Tails <https://tails.boum.org/>. After all, one could always torture you for access. <https://xkcd.com/538/> I've personally done everything that is shown in this blog, as well as participate in 'good practise', such as shutting down my computer when I'm not using it. Full: Securing Ubuntu-Desktop From the Bad-Guys, and the Good-Guys. <http://blog.internot.info/2014/06/securing-ubuntu-desktop-from-bad-guys.html> _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

1 0

are relays susceptible to the latest OpenSSL "freak" attack
by starlight.2015q1＠binnacle.cx 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Cipher-downgrade CVE-2015-0204 fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.1k. usual sensational write-up courtesy of El-Reg http://theregister.co.uk/security For operators who don't obsess over "non-critical" OpenSSL releases, is it time to catch up?

2 1

7 relays gone because of spammers
by Speak Freely 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hello fellow relay runners, This morning OVH decided to kill 7 of my relays due to spamming, and block all access to all services. I ran the Reduced Exit policy for all of my relays. Due to heightened concerns about this affecting other unrelated services I have with OVH, I had to shut down the other 3 relays. They may eventually re-appear as middle-relays. This has cost me hundreds of dollars, as I foolishly decided to prepay on an annual basis. None of the servers were older than 2 months. Some were only a few weeks old. The Abuse department's rationale is as follows: "Your account was suspended because 100% of your IPs are blacklisted on multiples lists for Spam and other malicious activities. This case is closed and this decision is final." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When I first contacted OVH regarding running Tor relays, this was the response that I received from them, which does not mesh with what just happened. "Good morning Matt, I'm very glad to here from you. It is very flattering to hear that you are very satisfied by our service at OVH! We do take our network speed and hardware performance very seriously here. We are proud of our infrastructure that we have built over the years. I do understand your concerns about setting up a Tor relay on one of our VPS. In a simple form, yes you can. We do let our customers use our VPS as Tor relays. We have no problem in letting you this. However, your are allowed to use Tor but it will be at your own risk. Rest assure that, in case of an abuse, we will not terminate your account without notice. In fact we may not even terminate your VPS. You will receive a warning from our Abuse department giving you a choice to resolve the abuse case. Like you said, we are in a world where free speech is constantly under attack and we are committed to help as much as possible to protect this fundamental right that we all have. We will absolutely not in any case share our customers information or data to authorities without a warrant. For any other questions or concerns, feel free to contact us at any time. We are available 24/7. Good luck with that privacy project of yours and keep on supporting the cause of free speech! Thank you for contacting OVH and have a wonderful day! Colin K. Customer Advocate" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Not that it matters anymore, but each relay was dedicated to one of the victims of the Charlie Hebdo attack. https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/4charlie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eventually I will get back at this... But for now, my money is gone, and all my hard work is lost. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So... I know I'm new. And it's possible this has happened (many times) before, but... You've been warned. Speak Freely

20 28

relayor: automation for relay operators (ansible)
by Nusenu 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, computers are better at doing repeatable things over and over again so let them take care of boring tasks. Based on David's ansible-tor [1] I created an ansible role to make relay operations more convenient (see the initial commit message for a longer list of changes). https://github.com/nusenu/relayor Core features: - - configure multipe tor instances on a server automatically generates two instances per available IP address (Memory auto detection is not implemented yet) - - take care of MyFamily automatically - - user configurable Nickname prefix - - easy Exit/Non-Exit setting (boolean) - - alpha vs. stable releases (boolean) Supported platforms: - Debian - CentOS - OpenBSD Everything is still fresh, so I would NOT recommend to use this on production relays. Testing and review is appreciated. There is still a crucial piece missing (init scripts), but I hope tor packagers are willing to incorporate multi-init support patches (see issues). I also have parts that adds monitoring (munin+vnstat+webserver) but that will go into a separate role. If you have never heard of ansible, it speaks to your servers using SSH and does not require an agent or a central management server - just run it from you client machine. http://www.ansible.com/resources (not entirely torbrowser friendly) http://docs.ansible.com If you are planing to run this role over tor when connecting to your servers, make sure you have the following set in your ~/.ansible.cfg: ssh_args = -o ControlMaster=auto -o ControlPersist=60s This ansible role is not about bridges or hidden services, but I'd like to add "management HSes" (SSH and monitoring) in the future. Nusenu [1] https://github.com/david415/ansible-tor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU8OdxAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0Aw0P/AiiprSbE5apWUtrCoyrO5GN MKRfwpvy/BGrKjOjBZAtIs+8+AMaRQXV54CUIG0QlewnVgWRUyXA635OIAY43hFR BY/In1IiSXcqKyjaTsM4No/Nh+tvdj2rt+MoYvrMTVQVl8i+CYQKt4ypHjRN1cGS OIdP/AWi9tt/eAl+IgUNf4/pud94UbruDfGHtDQ4xGeReNdo64Q92c2QicFOdwNc fIqrhb/aWydfgQehmjSAXM9i9WfBi5vMSh7D5lUxheqhEmjSiV1bw8mvQML+kXse nwv7AZj0MkoBYqTd0t3h1JJwPXt0Vjfi3ZZNPlOTx6gZmPfbgrezya+TrWHQy65M rw6B3E3L5UDjkJ1k3cyJWvtpUSyYCqzcUDIq6+gQxZhGH0pWQhutxqdt5C5S+qn7 9hWJcDUyjeSFwxRfhLphiSrPQEue6Eox+EWzcSh4YQh8hol/P8Ev5C4P/yavWF0m w0jGbQoVIwz0jMhZwW9w6KxmaZO68/3aEfWUXjLFg/DCp/nLXqR1kHxuiLgO/sd6 QumoOjxqu9KwV9crQX86dl9oMFFvUb7l1WqidMVZIR81WQkDIVWoypvxCnG2QhDo Z4Nily3qg3I3nW+QLTIY8XjUkVMLV/1kky9ETDb2Vvz0uR2H5tyZR6I9hQ4FaGHt Xjm7kZ9JgRZjixqyAhTz =/jyQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

Re: [tor-relays] tor exit node, low bandwidth
by Volker Mink 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] tor exit node, low bandwidth
by Volker Mink 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Fingerprint is E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0 And its running for about 6-7 weeks now. Any ideas? ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:16:41 +0100 From: Sebastian Urbach <sebastian(a)urbach.org> To: <tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] (no subject) Message-ID: <14ba721fef0.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda555f9(a)urbach.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Hi, >I have these settings in my torrc-file >RelayBandwidthRate 10000 KB? # Throttle traffic to >1000KB/s (800Kbps) >RelayBandwidthBurst 20000 KB # But allow bursts up >to 2000KB/s >(1600Kbps) MaxAdvertisedBandwidth 10000 KB ? >I have a decent cable-based internet-connection at >home and want to >share lots of bandwith. ?> >Unfortunately my exit node only does about 220kb/sec ?>avg: 219.2 Kb/sec, total: 18.4 GB?????? avg: 224.7 Kb/>sec, total: 18.5 GB ?> >What do i have to change to speed this up? Thank you for running a Relay. Please provide your fingerprint if you want other people to look into this matter. -- Sincerely yours / Sinc?res salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic. On February 20, 2015 1:36:43 PM "Volker Mink" <volker.mink(a)gmx.de> wrote: > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:25:33 -0500 From: Speak Freely <when2plus2is5(a)riseup.net> To: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] (no subject) Message-ID: <e9992411d4355c951426baf31003cd52(a)riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi! Welcome to the club! Doing some quick math based your avg speed and your total transfer, it looks like you've been running an exit relay for about a day. It takes some time to build consensus within the network, others can explain it better and in more detail.Don't worry, it takes some time for the network to give you much love, but it will! Take a look at one of my newest relays on atlas to see the ramp-up time. It's only been up for a couple of days. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E0FE2E053843F09480EFF75F0A27D095F96FFF 82 Here's an another relay, that shows once love starts, it stays. This one has been up for over a month... One of my first. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/BDE26705D49CB8AC3297953BCC2070FED9C611 53 Don't forget to provide the fingerprint for others to investigate. :) Matt -- Speak Freely ***

2 1

guard-failing message
by eliaz 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

My bridge's log showed: Feb 24 02:25:45.940 [Warning] Your Guard < guard name and fp > is failing a very large amount of circuits. Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded, but it could also mean an attack against you or potentially the guard itself. Success counts are 129/259. Use counts are 38/38. 242 circuits completed, 0 were unusable, 113 collapsed, and 5 timed out. For reference, your timeout cutoff is 60 seconds. Globe showed no 3-day chart for the guard. For my bridge, the chart showed a lot of traffic, the peaks or less than a KB. This pattern has been going on for a few days. The bridge usage display shows the usual traffic, but more anemic the past several days. To be on the safe side I did the following: * shut down the bridge, * reset my gateway address, * restarted the bridge after about 1/2 hour. Have I overreacted? - eliaz

1 0

Same relay (identity key) on two IPs
by catchthemall 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

Hi all, tl;dr: Due to a config error my relay [1] was running on two different IPs at the same time for about half a day. Now the traffic has dropped. I just wanted to make sure that it is not flagged as malicious or something ... Additionally I am curious about the policy in such a case. What happens if a relay shows up in the network with the same identity key but on different IP addresses? long-version (kinda funny): I am using webtropia [2] as a service provide which is, as far I can tell, is a good choice for running a relay. Some time ago I decided to change the hosting plan and switch to another offer at the same provider. For that reason I let my old contract run out until they notified me that my server will be shut down and deleted. After receiving this notification I checked that indeed my relay server was no longer reachable. Some time passed by until I had time to setup my old relay (same identiy key) on the new server. Done so I launched it and was happy to enjoy the increased bandwidth. What I missed was that in the meantime the old server was reactivated by the hosting provider without notifying me and as a result was running at the same time as the new one for about half a day. After I recognised this, I tried to ssh to the old server - which still worked perfectly and indeed confirmed that everything was as I left it. I shut down the relay running on the old server and wrote an e-mail to the hosting provider checking if they are going to charge me the reactivation and why the hell reactivated it. Up until now I only got an response that my old server was "shut down" and that the "hard disk was deleted on the 29.01.2015" ... .. I thought well ... since I can still ssh to that server I kinda doubt that this is the case. So since I still had ssh access to the "shut down server" I decided to setup another relay on the "deleted hard disk" of this machine until they believe me that there exists a small possibility that this thing is still running ... The "ghost" relay [2] is running fine up until now. [1] https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5A9B5923F4937C3ED76B0AD4CF1030C11FCAF… [2] http://www.webtropia.com/index.php [3] https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/23C31DBBEB898145D6E090D6DD8C06D72E55F…

3 5

Relay Node not acquiring Guard Flag.
by Sebastian Urbach 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi, On 02/23/2015 06:44 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote: > Because the criterias changed a while ago, only the fastest 25% of the > Relays are Guards anymore. >BTW, what's about minimum uptime ? Details for all the flags can be found here: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach ----------------------------------------- Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I hold in veneration - courage, clear thinking, honesty, fairness, and, above all, love of the truth. ----------------------------------------- Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956), American journalist, essayist, magazine editor, satirist and critic.

2 1

Relay Node not acquiring Guard Flag.
by Beagle Bone 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hey folks. 3xBT here, admin of the node of the same name. I was wondering why my node has yet to pick up the Guard flag: Fingerprint: D937161730610A5D66BDED6CF4D5C9692566D9FE Feb 23 06:25:05.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.4.24 (git-e3c61213fb2dc49a) opening new log file. Feb 23 06:25:05.000 [notice] Configured to measure directory request statistics, but no GeoIP database found. Please specify a GeoIP database using the GeoIPFile option. Feb 23 06:27:22.000 [notice] Your DNS provider gave an answer for "lya67fieutqf6", which is not supposed to exist. Apparently they are hijacking DNS failures. Trying to correct for this. We've noticed 1 possibly bad addre$ Feb 23 09:57:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 59 days 6:02 hours, with 153 circuits open. I've sent 414.64 GB and received 394.25 GB. Feb 23 09:57:31.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 97.080% Feb 23 09:57:31.000 [notice] TLS write overhead: 3% Feb 23 09:57:31.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 4059/4059 TAP, 3977/3977 NTor. Feb 23 15:02:49.000 [notice] New control connection opened. Feb 23 15:57:31.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 59 days 12:02 hours, with 158 circuits open. I've sent 416.55 GB and received 396.07 GB. Feb 23 15:57:31.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 97.087% Feb 23 15:57:31.000 [notice] TLS write overhead: 3% Feb 23 15:57:31.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 6032/6033 TAP, 4055/4055 NTor. Feb 23 17:23:54.000 [notice] New control connection opened. Additional info: When traffic is 4Mbit/sec, CPU and memory load is at ~50%. I'm also wondering why the log is only being written when I'm looking at it, and if there was anything I could do to increase usage of allotted bandwidth. -3xBT

3 2

drop in bandwith - because of fail2ban rule?
by tor＠viisauksena.de 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

hi i am wondering , because i constantly becoming less and less traffic / or given Bandwidth for a Tor exit relay with a bunch of flags .. the exit is on a debian, vserver with quit a lot of machine power behind, has it own IPv4 and there is also enough bandwidth (i checked this regulary with speedtests or fake downloads of whatever distros) https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/2AC2306BD625A9DD75532886842C268C3CDBB… i didnt change anything in configuration, beside one small thing after getting dozens of apache errorcode 504 port 80 and 443 to the Tor-IPv4.. and so i startet to make a fail2ban rule, because this doesnt make sense, also this comes often from a variety aof IPv4 en block from russia, china, korea (mostly) - so i optet for fail2ban more than ignoring these errors. This is the only thing i could imagine which connects to the network drop (ok some internet police whitehat watchers argue there is bad traffic here and than .. but this is "normal" i guessed for tor-exit) So i turned my rule of some 2-3 days, to see if this makes the drop in bandwidth - no effect. So i restartet back the fail2ban rule. So my question - tor hides in port 80 / 443 traffic - is this what i mistakingly block / or interfere .. or how this drop from near 14 Mb to 1,9 Mb is explainable? (while normal traffic on server goes well) thx, viisauksena (for completeness example of logoutput and fail2ban-regex ) # basicly i want to stop these lines # default-178_254_XXXXXX:443 104.245.96.249 - - [10/Feb/2015:16:52:07 +0100] "GET /" 400 549 "-" "-" [Definition] failregex = [^ ]+ <HOST>.*"GET /" 400 5[0-9][0-9]

1 0

Strong bumps in traffic with 0.2.6.3
by Christian Sturm 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

Hello, I noticed on my Tor relay that deploying 0.2.6.3 resulted in the bandwidth going up an down a lot which can be seen here: https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB3… It looks like I am not the only one. This CCC hosted relay (different OS, provider, etc.) appears to have the same thing happening: https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/9BDF3EEA1D33AA58A2EEA9E6CA58FB8A667288… It is hard to filter relays per version right now (maybe something onionoo could support?). Are others experiencing the same problems?

3 3

Running obfs4proxy on Debian Stable
by isis 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

Hello, I requested that the obfs4proxy package in Debian jessie be ported to wheezy-backports, [0] however, it seems this is extremely unlikely to happen because it would mean backporting pretty much every Golang package in existence. I would be super stoked if we could make it as easy and seamless as possible for the Bridge operators who are still running obfs2 (!!) to move to supporting better, newer Pluggable Transports. Currently recommended PTs to run are: obfs3, obfs4, scramblesuit, and fteproxy. When Tor Browser 4.5 becomes stable (probably in mid-April 2015), we'll want lots more obfs4 Bridges! For the super adventurous sysadmins who'd like to try Yawning's experimental new post-quantum PT, Basket [1] is one of the newest PTs. We should probably come up with some easy instructions for operators of Tor Bridge relays who are running Debian stable, such as adding an Apt pin to pull in only the obfs4proxy package and its dependencies from Debian jessie and keep everything else pinned to stable. If someone has done this, or has another simple solution, would you mind writing up some short how-to on the steps you took, please? [0]: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-anonymity-tools/Week-of-Mon-20… [1]: https://github.com/yawning/basket -- ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt

5 10

Tor relay only IPV6
by cmar433＠yandex.com 21 Feb '15

21 Feb '15

Hello, i try to run tor as relay .. but i have not any ipv4 adress.. is there any posibilities run tor as realy only for ipv6 adress ? for me seems is not functioning. (Debian wheezy) port 9001 is open but "conection refused" if i try IPV6 portscan I try open 22 only for test trough IPV6 portscan .. ist OK . port opened Any IDEA ? Thanks

4 4