- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

keypair issue after backing up relay
by Matlink 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

Hi, I'm running a tor relay. I once had some trouble about running it, and I decided to reinstall tor via apt-get. Of course, it did erased all my private and public keys, that I missed to backup before reinstalling tor. Then I ran tor again, with the new identity. As I have a container backup running every day, I was able to recover the erased private and public keys, that I put them back. I can run tor with my original identity, but the directory server is saying me '[WARN] http status 400 ("Looks like your keypair does not match its older value.")'. How can I fix it ? I would like to keep the original identity, since I had all the convenient flags and don't want to wait another couple of weeks to get them back with a new identity. Sincerly, -- Matlink - Sysadmin matlink.fr Sortez couverts, chiffrez vos mails : https://café-vie-privée.fr/ XMPP/Jabber : matlink(a)matlink.fr Clé publique PGP : 0x186BB3CA Empreinte Off-the-record : 572174BF 6983EA74 91417CA7 705ED899 DE9D05B2

2 2

warning in my relay log
by DARKNET.IT 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

I have changed server and tor version (from Tor 0.2.6.10 to Tor 0.2.7.5). My relay works but I have this warning: "http status 400 ("Looks like your keypair does not match its older value.") response from dirserver '208.83.223.34:443'. Please correct." This is my relay fingerprint: 59573AB90614D929360C7D9BCBF3313497A22AA2 What means and what I have to do? The keys for me is correct. Thanks for reply

3 2

Actions required after update?
by kingqueen 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

Hi That's a hefty changelog for the new stable release of Tor. I'm in awe of and grateful to the developers, as it's all well beyond me. Please could anybody confirm, is there any action required for somebody running the relay on a pretty bog-standard Ubuntu 12.04 Linux dedi, other than sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade ? Thank you!

3 3

IP-Echelon complains about claimed infringement
by Riccardo Mori 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, It's almost a week that I am receiving dozens of "Notices of Claimed Infringement" a day from IP-Echelon, all equals, saying that they "are contacting" me "on behalf of Paramount Pictures Corporation (Paramount)" and asking me to remove the film in question that is being shared via bittorent (the port varies each time). The first time I wrote them that the ip address in question is a Tor exit node, I explained briefly what is Tor and that I can't do anything to help them. I also wrote to MyLoc (the ISP) saying pretty much the same. I wrote to IP-Echelon another time but they never replied. Usually I wouldn't care about them but this time MyLoc told me to "fix the problem or" they "will block" my "server". I modified the exit policy so now I am running the reduced one[1] That (in theory) should fix the problem but I would like to avoid the reduced policy. Is there anyone that had the same issues with IP-Echelon and can help me? Usually how do you handle those annoying auto generated reports? Thanks, patacca [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWT+YZAAoJEE1LNuolWAxgl90P/Rq5DCCc4FrrFqqOSKjisJ57 zBVOpzrfDxAG0ArRFWdhUBi8etpvbNtq042mjevVGp3N3p+IPpyl9bKvZWM7ACID BtBnra7WwMEW21BHqKGmzXJ6CG35AdVRUaJMaJXXSaNGNThFh+mXDGm4B8iHUoI3 3vZxiIHG17INY7lZM7RimYA1MKRQAcICldIYaCA2Nwt/n4gbUlZ3OUXmeGbJins/ NZrN98ZOhxeNg93+wk3f5ns1mQk137ZIcsdb+86uyaqDCxGn7fja2/MXBeHBUonM cZcBUSw1SKdY3XbYh6VyHRhRxWfmHeB/e2MLlDiOZbVc5QgGsOkmwmPKFuNA1dvg w5QoXcUSpUh01mxEK0x1IRl5BAD1zya4ZyITxLAr7OXGVx1jifCvkCKq6rDrLzsX XP8hq8w6Hp9GuFr8QrOx08Q6kvAvQjcF59s6/h0P3ehdbLnNaquEgQA86+WDtlNU lON0MnCf5vmZbww0TP5ymhiiZZIy6uilaqfVJry9lXdiXJvu/xeWs1p2VkxlUpaD ySnjFArg8iT5+veZro1ui0tmqseyu2BdEPfAyu86FcrS3wpbvI983aPDZOEpDoJh NaiE5pQCtsxj7moL1pDfHfFfS23aTGerpj9VTXYE9vd/hO8gqZTWCFA7coDZcXQV 0ZdIkA2C4EI7Rd6ui/cS =CxVx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 4

Tor Weather not working?
by Green Dream 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

I took a relay offline 2 days ago and still haven't received a notification from Tor Weather. The preferences page confirms everything is configured, but yet, it doesn't seem to be working for me. I checked the spam folder. Is there someplace to file tickets for this, or some other contact info for the maintainers of this service? I'd be happy to share additional details if someone wants to look into it.

12 15

IP-Echelon complains about claimed infringement
by Riccardo Mori 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, It's almost a week that I am receiving dozens of "Notices of Claimed Infringement" a day from IP-Echelon, all equals, saying that they "are contacting" me "on behalf of Paramount Pictures Corporation (Paramount)" and asking me to remove the film in question that is being shared via bittorent (the port varies each time). The first time I wrote them that the ip address in question is a Tor exit node, I explained briefly what is Tor and that I can't do anything to help them. I also wrote to MyLoc (the ISP) saying pretty much the same. I wrote to IP-Echelon another time but they never replied. Usually I wouldn't care about them but this time MyLoc told me to "fix the problem or" they "will block" my "server". I modified the exit policy so now I am running the reduced one[1] That (in theory) should fix the problem but I would like to avoid the reduced policy. Is there anyone that had the same issues with IP-Echelon and can help me? Usually how do you handle those annoying auto generated reports? Thanks, patacca [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWT+YYAAoJEE1LNuolWAxg07MP/2ssZc9jiotv3+xReoTFs26j lOqTuEJ8dEAhmGig2hMkHwq+VZUhaDOB8OLPkFwUwFJ76PrvTz5j5p9LTYXwdFbE /2t8eeXTabITtQo0aO/t84g8UNRAmv4ZTWua9Z7DtzhLcrspvftTu3eL5rqbQ4v8 yxI55t8rHXH+sQG2K/io+OpRKjJLcMYexJl8PZOFld/AlkVvabwAtjJi5lhQfcmd V7dlckK1oQTWFGdyw9ww0Bsz1P7sjBLabUXuvP5gxdNyb3LB3uQVxL+29j5G+JBX W0JTJS25g52Mc2ggUiWnzUxdEuKf1pxHAy8Lb6CNG16ZGqZFBu/mdzt9yj72uzng ZUp5eanHVVJIzzkF7AviivkPI0RMUoK2FmwWa7/RrY3p97RrNRB+ytq2ky7IenKR cLx7WXPaG90lSYkHjTFpHZ4kRBVCX4Pd2xmQ8V1DOXMNiyTaabEWE58zVBnPrCQ4 QU+vUduWDkw0Lc8n3KZ0YDZfclhgCLn0qFageCmHRg8tlUgsHTySw6HFIDkYS+X3 6HZkkrOWsfjDAS9+6ZPe+/wzG7xIU9t/ObaxZIHPVydlDF8JlS4wdWHbLZYp608t DCk/l954+uVaQmQCBcah+tZr1Z+lxTJhCAh27QT/s/8WM+tYy9wHAmBLtlWACdFB i74TrbaBXGcX5/rplwjO =YDRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Fw: new message
by pridgar＠t-online.de 19 Nov '15

19 Nov '15

Hello! New message, please read <http://wclarkandassociates.com/been.php?zjh> pridgar(a)t-online.de

2 1

Abuse messages from IPs marked as rejected in the exit policy
by tor-admin＠torland.me 18 Nov '15

18 Nov '15

Hi all, I am receiving abuse messages for the Torland1 relay for IPs that are blacklisted in the exit policy. For example as https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E922A20AF608728824A620BADC6EFC8CB8C… shows, 62.67.194.0/24 is blocked. But I am getting abuse messages out of this IP range. Can someone explain me how this can happen? Thanks/regards Torland

2 1

New security feature in upcoming tor 0.2.7.x: OfflineMasterKey
by nusenu 18 Nov '15

18 Nov '15

Hi, I'd like to highlight a "new" security feature in the expected upcoming tor stable release: offline master keys I'm posting this here now - before the actual release - because if you upgrade without thinking about this feature your ed25519 master key will be generated the first time tor 0.2.7.x starts up and at that point in time it might be already to late for the - 'master key never touched my online relay' - option. Why are offline master keys better then online master keys? - you can keep the key under your control while using (semi-trusted) hosting providers - impact of relay compromise or seizure is less fatal and limited in time (default worst case: 30days) - the bad guys have to come back every 30 days to steal your keys again The default expiry for signing keys is 30 days but can be configured (torrc). It is also important to note that if you enable this feature your relays need more care (depending on how you configure key expiry). If you forget about it and the signing key expires your relay will shutdown. Something that will be noticed by a relay operator monitoring its relays and bw usage. Even if you are running 0.2.7.x already you can make use of this feature by moving your master key from the relay to an offline system + torrc configuration. Documentation is currently a bit light but s7r is working on improving it. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16645 related tor-dev thread: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-November/009905.html ansible-relayor will eventually support offline master keys but it will take some time until tor 0.2.7.x reaches all platforms including OpenBSD. A first (unreviewed) poc has been committed in a dedicated branch. https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/2c4040df7848f382ced02b43f3… Automation is key in making this feature usable (with short key expiry). You might want to consider this feature - especially if you run a significant portion of the tor network.

1 0

unlisted exit relay
by Green Dream 17 Nov '15

17 Nov '15

While visiting https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/ in Tor Browser, I noticed it wasn't detecting the exit node I was being routed through as a relay. Curious, I tried looking up the same IP in both Atlas and Globe, but neither knows of a relay at this IP. The IP of this exit is 104.156.228.115. What scenarios might cause this situation? As a Tor user, should I care? At the very least, it seems desirable to always be able to research the nodes you are using.

2 1

Tor exit node companion
by Eran Sandler 17 Nov '15

17 Nov '15

Hi guys, I had a thought about writing a small Tor exit node companion app. This would be a single executable that does 2 things: - Serve HTTP port 80 traffic on a specific host name and show the standard Tor web page for exit nodes - Serve port 25 (SMTP) and forwards abuse(a)mydomain.com to an address of your choosing Bonus points would be to make sure the HTTP requests serve the latest version of the Tor disclaimer page (so it will automatically take the latest and periodically check that its the latest). It will then replace the various parts (email of the operator etc). I can write it in Go so that its a single rather small executable so that the exit node will only need to run it instead of web server (nginx or something lighter) and an SMTP server (for those pesky automated posts that, like in the case of webiron, are also sent to abuse(a)mydomain.com based on the reserve DNS). Do you think it would be useful? I would sure be happy to run as little processes as possible. Eran

3 4

webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet
by yl 16 Nov '15

16 Nov '15

Hello, I received an abuse email today from my hoster (several emails from webiron in one email), typical automated abuse emails, not much information. However, they request, if the origin IP is a Tor exit, to block the full /24 subnet. As they also state, they will not provide the full IP of there customer and request to block the exit to the /24. Any thoughts on this? I don't like to block the whole /24, just because one idiot using one of the IPs is using some snake oil service like webiron, the collateral damage is to big in my eyes. All other IPs in the same range will be blocked as well. Why should I even care about blocking such IPs given by webiron? In my opinion the blocking is useless from my side and in the worst case the users of webiron will block my exit node IP. Would it be better for the tor network if I'd block the IPs? Is there any bad consequences if I don't for the Tor network? Let me know your thoughts. The services URL is https://www.webiron.com, don't need to go there, I didn't because such services are just useless. Better use fail2ban or something similar. Greeting yl

12 16

Limiting Bandwidth
by Billy Humphreys 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, does anyone know how to make a tor relay only use x bandwidth, then stop? I have a 1100GB/month max limit (100GB free) and I don't want it automatically suspending. Any ideas? Regards, Billy. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWQ8hDAAoJECGBE+89M6jOfSkQAJk/WtNbHWtDNZ+uBRVr6aCA 89OQ0xudFzz8oxWYkvgnEiSJFdHy+I5tzVVMjVGGl2dXOWN1QB4irWXkQ0xtE5bi 8t27YsWCNT71CMvvBhbeVEU8KMTwnRaW/pnpdbSY3082DljORLpioK+N4R3fyyXR F6xFmPZQtw4X2SruZNZX3TzPjgKuL7p3VTE6WEP9t/A0G3zX+yNi7A5jNSpwVak2 TMMlvQglgoM5TY/HHInXHS4tNPIBhORGNJoGw2mf+fFk6O/LgOnfNRt4FjaHZqBO NNQKtNicaJgqR5hC7+xojog/3quB7WvvqDtzfoJa3VGqtILMM7y3MKx0R81DzZ3l zOsUguYDpjUkxqd/QWdwtmzMeDB5yjh91QCFFfdR56D6bIedWjubYBLUDEXHchSH bstdWTD5ZAePYFgp//hnH2gX5D8X/cC1Kho0S8FLf9uuKKI4Bdmt0UaPmZW8rn2M nf6zIQB7vPLWY/RbA2/tJq1TB2w1JDMtn911uheCrX6H3OiTXLrxTjBz3yTyCzYM Oag6Jpv/991Ir56cBzS8jOHi7Vxr56QuW2S/Cgae8yewJy4St7ISah19dtIU1PGB 66rwK2MmQJ3DynhMqfkompsQNfvugXiC+KXqGoQH2zwAcI0vnsJAn4efpGLaoVcN V2Jcy26OnSvFlBLI3GVx =k9GQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

TorFlow
by Kenneth Freeman 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

A gorgeous visualization of the Tor's data traffic. Feast your eyes! https://torflow.uncharted.software/

5 9

graphing 3 months of onionoo data (2015-08-01 - 2015-10-31)
by nusenu 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Hi, here are a few graphs, that - unlike metrics.tpo - do not focus on relay count but consider CW fraction or exit/guard probabilities. OS share by CW fraction https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/pn… I didn't known about Tor 0.2.8 until I saw this graph https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/pn… ONLINE SAS taking over OVH SAS's position on the AS marked? https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/pn… France hosts 1/3 of the network's guard capacity https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/pn… and has become the biggest country when it comes to exit probability as well: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/pn…

1 1

Is this bridge worth running?
by eliaz 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

I'm running a bridge in Tor Browser 5.0.4 on Win7x86; torrc is fine, and I'm connecting to circuits. However my mean written/read bandwidth is reported in globe to be in the hundreds/tens range. The advertised bandwidth also jumps around, from about 10 to 51 kB/s. And a previous run over five months of continuous running the written/read bytes reached 7K only once. Is this data telling me that the bridge is not carrying much traffic at all? Is there anything I can do to improve performance? And is there any way that I can get some idea of the actual traffic load?- eliaz

1 0

Exit relay seized by police
by Kevin Beranek 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Is there a procedure I should follow if a relay has been seized by the police? Do DirAuths typically do something in cases where a relay is seized? I just got a message from NQHost stating that "We have received several police inquires and court order to seize your VPS. ". This affects relay A1E0245862C707F977DF0EC79257C49CD5DA99FE. Thanks, Kevin

10 21

interpreting extra-infos
by eliaz 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

Can anyone point me to a tutorial about how to read the extra-info output of CollecTor? I'm particularly interested in what bridge-ip-versions v4=0,v6=0 means and why bridge-ip-transports does not report the the pluggable transport proxies (obfs3, obfs4, etc.) for the bridge I'm running.

2 1

Wrong IP from faravahar again
by Pascal Terjan 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

Nov 04 17:06:00.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from 149.18.2.82 to 154.35.32.5; rebuilding descriptor (source: 154.35.175.225). Nov 04 17:08:55.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from 154.35.32.5 to 149.18.2.82; rebuilding descriptor (source: 154.35.175.225). 5.32.35.154.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer faravahar.rabbani.jp.

2 1

Faravahar messing with my IP address
by Logforme 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

I run the relay Logforme (855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34) Saw this in yesterday's log file: Oct 22 03:17:55.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from 84.219.173.60 to 154.35.32.5; rebuilding descriptor (source: 154.35.175.225). Oct 22 03:17:55.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor. Oct 22 03:17:56.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. Oct 22 03:26:55.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from 154.35.32.5 to 84.219.173.60; rebuilding descriptor (source: 194.109.206.212). 84.219.173.60: <- My real IP address 154.35.32.5: faravahar.rabbani.jp <- No idea 154.35.175.225: faravahar.redteam.net <- Authority server 194.109.206.212: tor.dizum.com <- Better authority server So if I read it right my relay asked the authority server Faravahar what my IP address is and got the wrong answer. 9 minutes later my relay asked another authority server and got the right answer. My relay show an uptime starting from this time and if the relay did a full restart it meant all the circuits got dropped? Inconvenient for users. My relay have "restarted" like this a few times the last weeks (only Tor daemon "restarting", not the machine). Don't know if Faravahar is behind the other "restarts". This time I just caught it in the log file before it got archived. Is this a know issue with Faravahar? If so, should it be fixed?

7 7

VPS/dedi paid with bitcoin for exit node anyone?
by Monoko Satou 08 Nov '15

08 Nov '15

Hi thar, I'm looking for relatively cheap dedicated/VPS servers offers for hosting more tor exit nodes that can be paid for using Bitcoin. Minimal connection speed I'm interested in is 100mbit. I've seen some offers here and there but maybe I'm missing something. I'd like fellow node operators to share some insight on the topic. I find the infos currently available on TOR project wiki etc little bit rusty. It'd be ideal to compile an article on the topic, if people can share their experiences I'd like to donate my time for this purpose that methinks other will find helpful if one wants to host a tor relay pretty much anonymously. I for one can share a positive opinion on hosting with "Baltic Servers", an LT based company. I'm running 2 exits and 2 relays there for 31 days at the moment without many hassle (you can find 'em by looking for 'netdive' on torstatus.blutmagie.de or on Atlas). Current average net troughoutput is rx/tx 274.56 Mbit/s / 265.90 Mbit/s and the abuse e-mails are being forwarded. Cheers, -- Netdiver

4 3

(no subject)
by 海洋 08 Nov '15

08 Nov '15

2015/11/8 10:51:15.400 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configured Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:51:15.400 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:51:15.400 [NOTICE] Closing old Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:51:43.300 [WARN] Error parsing Bridge address 'cert=MIST1psNVCb8KwXFb7UK7qO+HgnDF7C72lXxDeVOPEJVYDl2c6OuWgW26uZ8b2qeOOFaTg' 2015/11/8 10:51:43.300 [WARN] Controller gave us config lines that didn't validate: Bridge line did not parse. See logs for details. 2015/11/8 10:52:54.300 [WARN] Error parsing Bridge address 'cert=MIST1psNVCb8KwXFb7UK7qO+HgnDF7C72lXxDeVOPEJVYDl2c6OuWgW26uZ8b2qeOOFaTg' 2015/11/8 10:52:54.300 [WARN] Controller gave us config lines that didn't validate: Bridge line did not parse. See logs for details. 2015/11/8 10:53:21.300 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:53:21.300 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:53:21.300 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:53:21.300 [NOTICE] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:53:28.000 [NOTICE] Bootstrapped 5%: Connecting to directory server 2015/11/8 10:53:28.000 [NOTICE] Bootstrapped 10%: Finishing handshake with directory server 2015/11/8 10:53:28.000 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.161:58799 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:53:28.000 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 192.210.207.126:48475 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:53:28.000 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.91:38675 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:55:47.800 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configured Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:55:47.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:55:47.800 [NOTICE] Closing old Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:56:12.500 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:12.500 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:12.500 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:12.500 [NOTICE] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:56:18.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.161:58799 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:56:18.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.91:38675 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:56:18.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 192.210.207.126:48475 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:56:38.400 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configured Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:56:38.400 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:38.400 [NOTICE] Closing old Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:56:38.400 [NOTICE] Ignoring directory request, since no bridge nodes are available yet. 2015/11/8 10:56:38.900 [NOTICE] Delaying directory fetches: DisableNetwork is set. 2015/11/8 10:56:52.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:52.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:52.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:56:52.800 [NOTICE] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:56:58.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.91:38675 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:56:58.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.161:58799 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:56:59.000 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 192.210.207.126:48475 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:57:57.800 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configured Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:57:57.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 10:57:57.800 [NOTICE] Closing old Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:58:05.000 [NOTICE] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 10:58:11.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 192.210.207.126:48475 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:58:11.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.91:38675 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 10:58:11.900 [WARN] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 194.132.209.161:58799 ("general SOCKS server failure") 2015/11/8 11:02:48.800 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configured Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150 2015/11/8 11:02:48.800 [NOTICE] DisableNetwork is set. Tor will not make or accept non-control network connections. Shutting down all existing connections. 2015/11/8 11:02:48.800 [NOTICE] Closing old Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9150

1 0

(no subject)
by 海洋 08 Nov '15

08 Nov '15

obfs3 192.36.27.98:46121 0DEFB4F0212B8926D2F9B50E1A4149DC3F00CDC6 obfs3 194.68.32.238:44551 3C58A260CB4C5259B0214E63F384CD958934816C obfs3 54.201.127.175:40872 3DB93D8D4E1C02BA1FB6C881C18433091712A544

1 0

Tor non-exit relay - 0 circuits open
by Gergo 06 Nov '15

06 Nov '15

Hello A few days ago I started to run a Tor non-exit relay. Fingerprint: F6D5B2319748E8524478766310FD0E65F612E06A My internet connection speed 100Mbps down, 100Mbps up. (My relay runs from 16 to 18 hours a day.) But my advertised bandwidth just 66.56KB/s, and consensus weight 23 (Atlas). My relay data traffic per day just 20-30MByte. In the log heartbeat messages says 0 circuits open. What do I do wrong? Sorry for my bad english, I'm using a translator. Oberuaz

2 1

Tor Project slandered?
by Larry Brandt 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Last night my wife and I caught an episode of 'NCSI New Orleans.' The plot involved a brainiac from DARPA with a congenital heart problem. His job, he reported to NCSI, was to decrypt the Tor network. He needed a new heart to finish what was almost done. He stated: "97% of all illegal internet activity occurs on the deep web". He made no distinction between deep web and Tor. This morning I fired off an email to the show producer telling him what a disservice he was doing to people worldwide who needed anonymity. Maybe some of you will join me in communicating to him. LB

3 2