Has anyone tried running a live relay with
an image built using GCC 4.8 and
-fsanitize=address?
AddressSanitizer documentation says it should
be no worse than about x4 on CPU and typically
about x2, so it looks reasonable to try.
I'm seeing peak CPU of about 7-8% of a 2.2GHz
AMD core.
I'd probably create a static build, with
'libevent' and 'tor' compiled using
-fsanitize=address -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g
per the Google documentation and 'libz' compiled
normally since 'zlib' is stable …
[View More]and mature.
Any thoughts or experience?
Thanks
[View Less]
Hi there,
today I've read about the outage at "check.torproject.org". Since my torcheck-service "torcheck.xenobite.eu" needs the underlying TorDNSEL feature I'm trying to get this to work on my host. Like this I won't need to query the TorDNSEL-part of "check.torproject.org" anymore.
I'm not into programming and do not know anything about haskell, c++ and such. So be patient with me on such matters. ;-)
I've DL'ed the code from the internet website mirror [2].
I've prepp'ed all the …
[View More]dependencies using lucid binary packages:
ghc6 6.12.1-12
libghc6-mtl-dev 1.1.0.2-10
libghc6-network-dev 2.2.1.7-1
libghc6-time-dev 1.1.2.4-2
libghc6-hunit-dev 1.2.2.1-2
libssl-dev 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.15
libghc6-stm-prof 2.1.1.2-5
libghc6-binary-prof 0.5.0.2-1
First error I got on compile attempt was:
src/TorDNSEL/Main.hs:81:21: parse error on input `#'
That was quite easy thought:
import GHC.Prim (Addr#)
I deleted the '#' hopefully making it correct this way.
Next error is some numbers too high for me now:
src/TorDNSEL/DeepSeq.hs:20:7:
Could not find module `Data.ByteString':
It is a member of the hidden package `bytestring-0.9.1.5'.
Perhaps you need to add `bytestring' to the build-depends in your .cabal file.
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
The libghc6-bytestring-dev-0.9.1.5-125af ist installed by it's main package ghc6 6.12.1-12.
Any ideas?
Or are there some binary packages for TorDNSEL around, to make this more easy for me? :-P
Thanks,
BlueStar88
[1] https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-check-outage-03-and-04-july-2013
[2] https://www.torproject.org/tordnsel/dist/tordnsel-0.0.6.tar.gz
[View Less]
Hi all,
I set up an AWS EC2 cloud Tor relay a month ago and made an expensive
mistake. Perhaps others may learn from my example!
I followed the instructions on the tor-project website, and found that
it actually is quite a simple process, as it says. I did notice that
the AWS setup screens I was seeing were different from the screenshots
on the website, but they were asking me similar questions so I just went
with the defaults where the website said "No changes". I didn't look
…
[View More]closely enough.
Everything went to plan and I watched the relay work for a month.
However, on the AWS EC2 Management console I neglected to click on
"Services" then "Billing" to see how much they were charging me.
At the end of the month I got a bill for 120 dollars. And Amazon were
quite right - they were charging me for the 1024 GB of storage I had
accidentally asked for by not changing the default when I set up the
instance. The first 30 GB were free, the other 994 I was paying for.
And I was only actually using 1.5 GB ...
There doesn't seem to be any way of shrinking the storage of an existing
instance (though it can be expanded, now, with EBS, Elastic Block
Storage), so I had to terminate it (which deletes the storage) and
create another instance with a more reasonable 10 GB (of which df tells
me I'm now using 11%).
So ... if you've recently set up an AWS EC2 cloud relay with the Tor
AMI, check your storage, and your billing!
I think the option to specify your storage amount (with its default of
1024 GB) may have been introduced when AWS introduce EBS instead of just
instance-backed storage (which may have defaulted to the size of the AMI??).
In any case, I think the tor-project website AWS screenshots urgently
need to be changed to reflect the current setup procedure, with a
warning not to accept the 1024 GB default and an explicit recommendation
about the amount of storage to ask for (was my guess of 10 GB reasonable?).
Oh well, I have gained 100 dollars worth of wisdom from the episode. My
way of "Don't look too closely, and hope for the best at the end of the
month" was *not* a good idea.
Nick Sheppard
[View Less]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
I've built Tor 0.2.4.18-rc for the Raspberry Pi and released
unofficial packages[1]. They are signed with my GPG key, but as
always, if you don't trust binary packages from some dude on the
internet, please see the instructions to compile them for yourself[1].
1.
https://github.com/gordon-morehouse/cipollini/tree/master/raspbian_packages…
2. https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en#source
Best,
- -Gordon M.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----…
[View More]-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSj5ghAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujpugIAL8U1aGVZQ4FSqCgRac0g4oW
pqEGYT/aHI7GYX1J0ruS5kSjB7VGBqqskvb3LmWkSjMbJwX7MqTLbfUBj/wX8db8
sHTH/cdFNin3qazjrMnS0fe6bJ/AlimPcQSQfeEPQ3w5Wqk2Lb/qxVEY0cGxwYDn
p6P4KItegJkWcT7pKHCcIkLcjUHjalS4N9xUOg0oFh1cXzA4YRrMbrmHuNuNYtOG
OV09+56jlOJm6ApsYHNiDO/3lYB8xPnaMs8EbOVWUjBsh0kraTusXvNs9IquZEXd
Pk83VhavdsiAmksz5u6q7+gVIXsBkwxTBlpybj5aWNOwze2D4DNe/eBKVzLTu2w=
=7g1s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[View Less]
When my bridge uses only the same few MBs each day, i guess it isn't
used at all right?
Is there a simple way to ensure it is in bridgeDB and functioning as it
should?
thanks,
martin
Torservers.net invites Tor exit relay operators and organizations to a
meetup. If possible/relevant, for example if you're a member of one of
the 'Torservers partner organizations', please prepare some slides on
your activities. We will do quick presentations on recent and future
activities around Torservers.net.
Afterwards, the official members meeting of German Zwiebelfreunde e.V.
will be held in this room.
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2013/wiki/Session:Tor_Relay_Operators_Meetup
Starts …
[View More]at: 2013/12/27 03:00:00 PM
Ends at: 2013/12/27 05:00:00 PM
Duration: 120 minutes
Location: Hall 13
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
[View Less]
I was directed to this mailing list by a user on #tor IRC, so I'm
hoping it's ok to ask for help here.
For the past 2 to 3 months I've been running tor on my pi without any
problems. The repository has been great, pulling out the correct ARM
binaries, and it setup fine. This morning I tried updating the
software, but the step "Checking if tor configuration is valid" fails;
there are also 2x seg faults in the terminal output, not sure if this
is a repository issue (fetching an x86 …
[View More]binary instead of ARM). The
terminal output is here: http://pastebin.com/9Re2jrRe.
[View Less]
i don't know, who knows how tor-weather sends the t-shirt e-mail.
i took a look at the code and found that the mail is sent after 1464 hours of uptime (=61 days), checking every hour.
according to this the downtime due to updates is really not that relevant.
i'd guess that there are approx. 3 or 4 updates in the required 2 months, which would "cost" you an equivalent amount of hours.
i don't think that it matters whether you get your mail 3 or 4 hours later.
so i think the algorithm is fine.
…
[View More]Am 30.12.2013 um 13:00 schrieb tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org:
> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tor-relays-request(a)lists.torproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tor-relays-owner(a)lists.torproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Tor Weather getting T-shirt email. Problem
> (Random Tor Node Operator)
>
> Von: Random Tor Node Operator <tor(a)unterderbruecke.de>
> Betreff: Aw: [tor-relays] Tor Weather getting T-shirt email. Problem
> Datum: 30 .Dezember 2013 12:48:16 MEZ
> An: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org
> Antwort an: tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org
>
>
> Signierter PGP Teil
> On 12/28/2013 01:26 AM, I wrote:
> > I think two months is a bit short to be rewarded with a t-shirt
> > from donated resources.
> >
> > It makes more sense to extend the time but include the total time
> > running ignoring minor disruptions.
>
> I agree with that point, because currently, relay operators have the
> incentive to not update to the latest Tor version whenever a new
> version is released, in order to keep the consecutive uptime high.
> That is probably not in the best interest of Tor.
>
> Maybe Tor Weather could look at the flags instead of the consecutive
> uptime instead. For example, you typically don't lose your Guard or
> Stable flag due to a reboot.
>
>
>
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
> >> : i noticed a problem with tor weather. I should have recieved a
> >> email : -Uptime is nearly 100%,
> >>
> >> Tor weather needs some updating, however it continues to email
> >> plenty of relay operators. The reason you didn't get an email is
> >> tor weather didn't see your relay matching the uptime
> >> requirement,
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________ GET
> > FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM & EMAIL - Learn more at
> > http://www.inbox.com/smileys Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger,
> > Yahoo!® Messenger, ICQ®, Google Talk™ and most webmails
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> > list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[View Less]
Roger Dingledine and Jacob Applebaum speaking on Tor at 30C3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SscFfzD_his
____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!