- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Announcing the shutdown of our Tor Relay "ExitTheMatrix"
by George Hartley 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

Hello dear list readers and contributors, We received UDP floods (mostly through DNS Amplification) which were usually 60-70 GBit/s in size, up until a month ago this was not a problem for most of the exit relays lifetime, because we had a custom Tilera sitting between our server and the remaining infrastructure. Since the Tilera hardware was leftover hardware that we initially bought, maintained and installed in agreement with the colocation contract, the DC had no responsibility for it. Last month the Tilera failed, and additionally the DC had constant issues with their line-cards. So, now we just had our 1GbE link and the default 10GbE scrubbing provided by the DC's routers. This was not nearly enough, the largest attack ever we saw after that was reported to be over 140 GBit/s and also knocked some other servers in the same room offline too. These attacks were not directed towards my VM's bridged failover IP on the colocated server that I share with my friend, but towards the game servers he was hosting on his main NIC IP. Right now, every single attack above 10 GBit/s traffic will result in a null-route if it exceeds 60 seconds. This is incredibly cheap for malicious attackers to achieve, so I decided to take the relay offline for good and wipe the keys as well, both on my encrypted online cloud sync provider (MEGA) as well as from my machines MEGASync folder. The fingerprint is / was: 0F8538398C61ECBE83F595E3716F7CE7E4C77B21 If you look it up now, you will see it used to be on my own link for a while, but since we don't have a static IPv4 assignment (VDSL2 is still incredibly popular in rural areas such as the one that I live in), so the constantly changing IP address would have been just a pain in the butt for clients (one forced DSL disconnect every 24 hours). I currently don't have enough money for a decent dedicated server or VM and a host that I can trust which doesn't have too many Tor relays already. In total, according to vnstat, we routed 20TB's of exit traffic per month for the last 3 months, the relay was up for a total of around 292 days with a fresh set of secret keys, the relay before that, same name but different keys, was online for around 60 days while optimizing the hypervisor, libvirtd and guest OS for maximum performance / throughput). According to my calculation, we have contributed roughly ~180 Terabytes of exit traffic, and maybe 500GB's of Guard traffic (this was mainly an exit relay, so I didn't expect much more). I personally have been hosting Tor (Exit) Nodes for almost 10 years under different names and e-mail addresses, and it is definitely a New Year's resolution to continue that fashion. Tor was incredibly helpful for me, so I will continue return the favor. I also will continue to be active on the mailing list to help new people, as long as my time allows for it. Happy Holidays to everyone reading this, I sincerely hope you have a good time with your family and friends. All the best, -GH

1 0

Unable to bind to IPv6
by Eddie 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

I had an issue with my VPS that I didn't notice for a while where I had lost my IPv6 addressing. After contacting support they have restored the IPv6 address, but I'm now unable to bind to the address. I've a feeling it's more either my configuration or the VPS configuration at fault, not tor, but I thought I'd throw it out for ideas, as I'm not that confident (yet) with IPv6 stuff. Here's the interface: 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether a6:6a:08:73:42:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp0s18 inet xxx.yyy.87.222/26 brd xxx.yyy.87.255 scope global eth0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 aaaa:bbbb:1a:10::1/64 scope global dadfailed tentative valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::a46a:8ff:fe73:4227/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever root@fw1475:~# ip -6 route aaaa:bbbb:1a:10::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium default via aaaa:bbbb:1a:10:a46a:8ff:fe73:4227 dev eth0 proto static metric 1024 pref medium And the netplan configuration: root@fw1475:~# netplan status Online state: online DNS Addresses: 127.0.0.53 (stub) DNS Search: . ● 1: lo ethernet UNKNOWN/UP (unmanaged) MAC Address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 Addresses: 127.0.0.1/8 ::1/128 ● 2: eth0 ethernet UP (networkd: eth0) MAC Address: a6:6a:08:73:42:27 (Red Hat, Inc.) Addresses: xxx.yyy.87.222/26 aaaa:bbbb:1a:10::1/64 fe80::a46a:8ff:fe73:4227/64 (link) DNS Addresses: 1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1 Routes: default via xxx.yyy.87.193 (static) xxx.yyy.87.192/26 from xxx.yyy.87.222 (link) aaaa:bbbb:1a:10::/64 metric 256 fe80::/64 metric 256 default via aaaa:bbbb:1a:10:a46a:8ff:fe73:4227 metric 1024 (static) And this is what I get from the IPv6 OR port, determined by commenting/uncommenting the relevant line in my previously working configuration: 2024-12-14T20:36:38.782783+00:00 fw1475 tor[2317]: Dec 14 20:36:38.782 [warn] Failed to parse/validate config: Failed to bind one of the listener ports. 2024-12-14T20:36:38.782821+00:00 fw1475 tor[2317]: Dec 14 20:36:38.782 [err] Reading config failed--see warnings above. Any ideas/help would be gratefully accepted. Cheers, Eddie

3 3

Standalone snowflake proxy re-testing as restricted
by 0x5fcfbd30＠proton.me 21 Dec '24

21 Dec '24

Hey there, I have been running a standalone snowflake proxy for quite some time now. First in a docker container, but now in its own linux container to have more control over it myself. This has worked out great so far with an ephemeral-ports-range of 200 ports. Those are forwarded to the linux container in my router. Since a few days, I noticed a big drop in connections per hour. I restarted the proxy and it tested as restricted even though all ports are properly forwarded and I see the UDP packets reaching the machine via tcpdump. After several restarts, I finally got it to confirm unrestricted but 6 hours later (default re-test period?), its restricted again. Just to rule out the obvious, is it only me having this problem? I'm building from source and git log says: commit f940d7d6efe423c4d7a901a33d34bb51086b4a41 Date: Tue Nov 26 16:19:49 2024 +0000 chore(deps): update module github.com/pion/ice/v4 to v4.0.3 I wonder if this is a problem of my local setup or a bug snowflake itself. Any ideas? Best regards, 0x5fcfbd30

3 3

Tor activities at 38th Chaos Communication Congress, Hamburg, 2024
by gus 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Hello, Join us for Tor activities @ 38th Chaos Communication Congress (38C3): https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/ The 38th Chaos Communication Congress runs from December 27 to 30, 2024 in Hamburg. We've got a lineup of Tor activities happening during this congress! - December 28: "Guardians of the Onion" (20:30 - 21:30, Day 2): (live streaming, recorded) https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/hub/en/event/guardians-of-the-onion-ens… - December 29: "Tor Relay Operator meetup & State of the Onion Operators" (23:00 - 01:00, Day 3): https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/hub/en/event/tor-relay-operators-meetup… - December 30: "All things Tor related!" (11:00 - 13:00, Day 4): https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/hub/en/event/tor/ - Tor Project assembly (near Cold North/BornHack assembly): https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/hub/en/assembly/tor-project/ See you there! \o/ Gus -- The Tor Project Community Team Lead

1 0

Next Tor Relay Operator Meetup - December 7th 2024 @ 1900 UTC
by gus 17 Dec '24

17 Dec '24

Dear Relay operators, Save the date! Our next online meetup is happening on Saturday, December 7th, 2024 at 1900 UTC[1]. I'm happy to announce that we'll have a special guest, Ben Collier, joining us to discuss his new book:"Tor: From the Dark Web to the Future of Privacy."[2] (2024) ## Agenda 1. Announcements - New WebTunnel bridges campaign - https://blog.torproject.org/call-for-webtunnel-bridges/ - Upcoming in-person events 2. Ben Collier's book presentation & discussion ## How to join Meetup details: - Room link: https://tor.meet.coop/gus-og0-x74-dzn - Date & Time: Saturday, December 7th, 2024 @ 19.00 UTC - Duration: 60 to 90 minutes - Tor Code of Conduct: https://community.torproject.org/policies/code_of_conduct/ - Registration: No need for a registration or anything else, just use the room link above. The room will open 10 minutes before the meetup starts. ## DON'T MISS SOTO This month, the Tor team was very busy with State of the Onion (SOTO), and I'd like to invite you all to watch the videos: - Community Day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EODNtLqD7f8 - Tor Project Teams update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjPdReNmf_g cheers, Gus [1] If you're confused about UTC and your timezone, @anarcat maintains a cool project called undertime - https://gitlab.com/anarcat/undertime [2] "Tor: From the Dark Web to the Future of Privacy" book is available here: https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5761/TorFrom-the-Dark-Web-to-the-… -- The Tor Project Community Team Lead

2 3

install OBFS4
by Keifer Bly 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

Hi, So for Debain 12, what is the command to install OBFS4? For my bridge at https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/0E547D99DEB753B20A19EEAA053C… Even though I configured obfs4 in torrc its saying no transport protocols. Thanks. The torrc Nickname udeservefreedom ORPort <hidden> Log notice file /var/tornitces.log/notices.log SocksPort 0 BridgeRelay 1 PublishServerDescriptor bridge BridgeDistribution email ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:<hidden> ExtOrPort auto ExitPolicy reject *:* ContactInfo keiferdodderblyyatgmaildoddercom --Keifer

4 6

Question about WebTunnel bridge
by apfelnymous＠tutanota.de 11 Dec '24

11 Dec '24

Hi, can I run a webtunnel bridge on the same device that already runs a common bridge ? I have 1 bridge relay running 24/7, I could setup another machine for the webtunnel bridge but I can't get another ipv4 . Should I put it down and replace with a webtunnel bridge ? Thoughts ? Cheers

1 0

Tor Relay via Tailscale Funnel?
by Derek Martin 07 Dec '24

07 Dec '24

Long time lurker. Saw the call for more middle relays. I have a large amount of spare capacity on my homeserver and 2.5GB fiber to the house. Is there precedent for running a relay through a Tailscale Funnel? I would need to check to make sure Tailscale TOS was okay with it, but to my ISP, it'd just look like Wireguard traffic. Any thoughts or fools errand?

1 0

ORPort bug is an impediment to running on my servers
by Red Oaive 07 Dec '24

07 Dec '24

Bug 40994 (reported at https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40994) has become a fairly serious impediment to running relays. I generally obtain two ipv4 addresses on my machines and the ports I want to use for tor are not available on both addresses. So listening on 0.0.0.0 is not an option for me. And listening on a specific address incurs the serious problem where NoListen even when not specified seems to be assumed without recourse (see discussion at https://v236xhqtyullodhf26szyjepvkbv6iitrhjgrqj4avaoukebkk6n6syd.onion/t/re…)

1 2

Countering botnet traffic using DNS blocklists
by Imre Jonk 06 Dec '24

06 Dec '24

Hi all, Haven't posted in a while here, it's good to see that this list is still going strong :) I hope that some Tor Project employee can reply on list item 2 below. I've been co-operating an exit relay for some four years now. My usual response to abuse notifications is adding a reject rule to my ExitPolicy that blocks outgoing traffic to the attacked IP address/subnet. I do this mostly to prevent overhead for the volunteer abuse coordinators that operate the network that my exit resides in, but also to "do something" (not much, but at least something) for the attacked network. Yesterday however, I received a notification from my government's proactive security alerting service, notifying me of a botnet using my exit relay for communication. Now, I both like the Tor Project and privacy in general, and at the same time dislike botnets. And this made me think: what if I configure my DNS resolution to block queries for known botnet C&C domains? It would make it a bit harder to abuse the Tor network for botnet communications, and save a bit of bandwidth for users that have a good faith need for anonimity (you know, these users [1]). [1] https://2019.www.torproject.org/about/torusers.html.en Now, I'm aware there are a couple of downsides to this: 1. Starting to block things could be considered a slippery slope. First it's botnets, then it's piracy, then whatever else the government dislikes. I'm not too worried about this as long as I can choose what I block myself, and I already counter BitTorrent usage by using the well-known ReducedExitPolicy. 2. This old GitLab wiki page [2] lists a relay that is using a censored DNS provider as an example of a bad relay. It however doesn't provide a reason for this. If the DNS provider *only* blocks requests for known C&C domains, would that be okay? [2] https://gitlab.torproject.org/legacy/trac/-/wikis/doc/ReportingBadRelays#wh… 3. Obviously, the Unbound blocklist source or censoring DNS provider that would be used would gain some control over traffic on the Tor network. I'd say this is a tradeoff. If *only* C&C domains are blocked, I would be okay with this. 4. Potential legal issues. I know that in some jurisdictions (the U.S. I believe is a good example) setting up selective filtering makes the filter operator at least somewhat responsible for the traffic that passes through the filter. I'm not too worried about this at the moment. Both my exit relay and I are situated in the Netherlands. What do you guys think? Do we accept DNS filtering for blocking botnet traffic, or do we all cry censorship over this? Cheers, Imre

1 0

Tor automatic start
by Keifer Bly 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi, So on Debain 12, is there a way to configure tor to start automatically when the os boots? Thanks. --Keifer

4 4

WebTunnel Hardware Requirements
by Dan 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Hi all, I'm hoping to spin up some webtunnel bridges in response to the call for more. I currently run a few middle relays, but have never setup a bridge. I have found a provider in the good-bad-isps list that offers additional IPv4 addresses for a small fee so I'm planning to run 5 bridges from 1 VPS to make management easier. Is this enough horsepower to run 5 WebTunnel bridges? - 4 vCore AMD EPYC Rome - 8 GB memory - 48 GB SSD Thanks

2 1

Re: Tor automatic start
by fossdd 02 Dec '24

02 Dec '24

On Sun Dec 1, 2024 at 8:15 PM CET, Keifer Bly wrote: > Hi, > > So on Debain 12, is there a way to configure tor to start automatically > when the os boots? Thanks. > > --Keifer Do you mean something like, `systemctl enable tor`?

1 0

A call for more WebTunnel bridges
by gus 02 Dec '24

02 Dec '24

Dear relay operators, Last week, we kicked off a campaign to grow the number of Tor WebTunnel bridges. And the response has been amazing! In less than five days, we've already increased 80+ new WebTunnel bridges! Today is 'Cyber Monday', and it's a good opportunity to take advantage of special offers from hosting providers and contribute to this campaign. Learn how to join this campaign below or read our blog post for more details: https://blog.torproject.org/call-for-webtunnel-bridges/ Thank you for running relays & bridges, Gus ## Summary We are calling on the Tor community and the Internet freedom community to help us scale up WebTunnel bridges. If you've ever thought about running a Tor bridge, now is the time. Recent reports from Tor users in Russia indicate an escalation in online censorship with the goal of blocking access to Tor and other circumvention tools. This new wave includes attempts to block Tor bridges and pluggable transports developed by the Tor Project, removal of circumvention apps from stores, and targeting popular hosting providers, shrinking the space for bypassing censorship. Despite these ongoing actions, Tor remains effective. One alarming trend is the targeted blocking of popular hosting providers by Roscomnadzor. As many circumvention tools are using them, this action made some Tor bridges inaccessible to many users in Russia. As Roscomnadzor and internet service providers in Russia are increasing their blocking efforts, the need for more WebTunnel bridges has become urgent. ## Bridge campaign rules for participation The campaign starts today, November 28, 2024, and will run until March 10, 2025. As a token of our appreciation for your volunteer work, we're offering a Tor t-shirt to operators who run 5 or more WebTunnel bridges during this period. Please note: Only one t-shirt will be awarded per operator. See the technical requirements below to participate in the campaign. WebTunnel deployment guide: https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/webtunnel/ ## Technical requirements to join this campaign 1. Operators must run one WebTunnel bridge per IPv4. It is acceptable to use multiple subdomains or distinct domains. 2. Include a valid email address as your contact information. Or we won't be able to confirm and validate your participation in the campaign. 3. Maintain your bridges running for at least 1 year. 4. Ensure your bridges have a solid uptime, operating close to 24/7. Reboots for updates are fine. 5. Your bridge must remain functional during the campaign period. 6. Do not host your bridges with Hetzner. See: https://ntc.party/t/12845 ## How to participate After spinning up and verifying that your 5 WebTunnel bridges are working, confirm your participation by emailing frontdesk(a)torproject.org with the following template: ``` Subject: Participation in Bridge Campaign 2025 Body: Hi, I'm signing up for the Tor Bridge Campaign. These are my bridges: <Add here your bridge lines> My t-shirt is (pick your size: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/team/-/wikis/tshirts/tshirt-siz…) ``` To validate your participation, please contact us using the same email address listed in your contactinfo. You can expect your reward to be shipped in Q2 2025. -- The Tor Project Community Team Lead

1 0

haproxy webtunnel
by Softail 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

I'm trying to set up a webtunnel bridge using haproxy since that's what I use for ssl. I have the webtunnel docker image, which is a bit oldish but seems to be working, is reachable from the internet, listening on 15000 etc. When I connect with a browser using the random string exactly as it is in the bridge line it finds it and passes it on. That doesn't work but haproxy did the right thing. I can append anything to that and haproxy works. When I try to connect from android tor browser using the browser line, it tries to connect and I see it in the logs but as far as I can tell is not sending that string. I expected to have trouble with the websockets but this has never been a problem with haproxy before. ATM not really sure where to turn other than back to nginx, which after all is possible but yet another thing to tend, or recompiling, try not Android? Thanks

1 0

Regarding IPv6 & webtunnel bridge
by Dionysios K. 29 Nov '24

29 Nov '24

Hello, Is there any particular configuration change I have to do in torrc/nginx for my bridge to be listed as both v4/v6 on the metrics website? It's a webtunnel bridge and that complicates things, for obfs4 the configuration is pretty much straightforward. D.

3 2

Restart of standalone Snowflake proxies required
by Cecylia Bocovich 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

We recently completed an upgrade to the Snowflake broker machine[0] that required us to move the broker to a different IP address. We found, after updating our DNS records, that the standalone (command-line) proxies will not re-resolve the domain name of the broker and will continue to make connections to the old IP address until restarted. If you run a standalone Snowflake proxy, please restart when you get a chance. Thanks! [0] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snow…

1 0

relay operator meeting postponed
by George 23 Nov '24

23 Nov '24

Greetings fellow relay operators! Sorry for the last minute notice, but we're postponing the usual relay operators meeting previously set for tomorrow. Stay tuned for a new date. George -- 43C2 85B0 41B6 4AC1 0E02 2767 7092 AEB3 40B0 C804

1 0

Solicitation for an IPv4 block
by Christopher Sheats 20 Nov '24

20 Nov '24

Hello everyone, In light of Tor Project's push into the global south, I'm bringing on a new advisory board member (https://freeradical.zone/@kedislav) from Chile, and together we're documenting co-location and IP transit costs in the country for a possible Tor exit relay deployment. However, in order to do this, we need some company/university/nonprofit, or some kind person, to donate to us a /24 (or greater) IPv4 block. If said entity is in the USA, it's possible to make this a tax-deductible donation since we are a 501(c)(3). If you could connect me to anyone who might be able to do this for Tor, please feel free to connect me over Signal or email. We can use our existing IPv6 block for dual-stack relays. Or we might get a new ASN and new IPv6 block for that region. If you have any information about Chilean co-location and/or IP transit deals, or contacts, or even good places to get used or new servers, please let me know. I'm hoping that our involvement in the region will help inspire others to do something similar. We'll of course do a full bi-lingual write up like we did in 2017 (https://emeraldonion.org/blog/starting-a-human-rights-isp/) -- Christopher Sheats Director, Emerald Onion Signal: +1 206.739.3390 // emerald.01 Web: https://emeraldonion.org Mastodon: https://digitalcourage.social/@EmeraldOnion

1 0

Journal warnings spam
by Dionysios K. 19 Nov '24

19 Nov '24

Hey guys, Do you have any solution to stop the spam caused by tor: The IPv4 ORPort address 127.0.0.1 does not match the descriptor address <IP>. If you have a static public IPv4 address, use 'Address <IPv4>' and 'OutboundBindAddress <IPv4>'. Indeed I have a static IP but behind nat, so defining it in torrc is not possible as it can't bind to it.

2 2

Re: Looking for a new provider? Try Wedos.
by George Hartley 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

First of all, sorry for the late re-post of this e-mail to the list. An individual also active on the tor-relays list messaged regarding a new provider, I recommended one which is not crowded with Tor nodes, but our fellow decided to lie about the provider. Please read their quote. I can still recommend Wedos.cz for Guards/Middle relays, as well as bridges, and if you have very restrictive exit policy, maybe also for exits - however, confirm with staff first, and let them know which ports you want to allow. Also, always reply to all non-automated abuse reports, and forward them to the address for processed abuse reports given to you by staff. This was my original reply: Because their AI chat bot has infinite intelligence right? I know 2 people working there personally, Michal Jakubec and Roman Mondek, and they both reassured me yesterday that Guard/Middle and Bridge are NOT a problem, as long as they stay Guard/Middle or Bridge nodes. Using Tor FROM their network is also no problem.. using Tor to access THEIR is no problem. But, I did not trust their word.. So I tried it myself: No problem accessing the website using around 10 different exit nodes.. Then, I tried to order: Again, no problem! Received bitcoin payment information using a Tor mail service within 10 minutes: This is where I stopped, I did not pay the invoice and e-mailed Wedos stafff to please remove the order. But, Wedos supports Tor, and is a great choice especially for Guards/Middle nodes as well as bridges. Please don't lie about providers.. alternatively, if they still don't support Tor for you, please show the symptoms you are encountering. -GH On Thursday, November 7th, 2024 at 5:11 PM, Red Oaive clearly(a)ivegotyour.pw wrote: > On 2024-11-05 16:32, George Hartley via tor-relays wrote: > > > Also, please consider using a provider that is not overcrowded with > > Tor nodes already like OVH. > > > > I can recommend Wedos.cz ... https://wedos.cz/en/ > > They block access to their web site to Tor users. This doesn't bode well > for how Tor friendly they are. Their chatbot also claims tor is not > allowed: > > "Running Tor relays on a VPS from WEDOS is generally not allowed > due to the potential misuse of such services for attacks" > > Too bad becasue the price you quotes is attractive.

1 0

Re: Update: Tor relays source IPs spoofed to mass-scan port 22
by littlehoster.denote399＠passinbox.com 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

Hi, I had very similar reports to [tor-operator_urdn.co](https://forum.torproject.org/u/tor-operator_urdn.co): DateTime Action AttackClass SourceIP Srcport Protocol DestinationIP DestPort 0 30-Oct-2024 14:06:13 BLOCKED attempted-recon 92.51.45.21 0 202.91.162.47 22 1 30-Oct-2024 14:43:35 BLOCKED attempted-recon 92.51.45.21 0 202.91.162.24 22 2 30-Oct-2024 15:11:40 BLOCKED attempted-recon 92.51.45.21 0 202.91.162.24 22 3 30-Oct-2024 15:19:05 DENIED 92.51.45.21 64006 TCP 202.91.162.172 22 4 30-Oct-2024 15:19:20 BLOCKED attempted-recon 92.51.45.21 0 202.91.162.24 225 30-Oct-2024 15:44:49 DENIED 92.51.45.21 18054 TCP 202.91.161.94 22 The report is from the same IP-range.

1 0

Update: Tor relays source IPs spoofed to mass-scan port 22
by gus 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

Hello everyone, I'm writing to share that the origin of the spoofed packets has been identified and successfully shut down today, thanks to the assistance from Andrew Morris at GreyNoise and anonymous contributors. I want to give special thanks to the members of our community who have dedicated their time and efforts to track down the perpetrators of this attack. Although this fake abuse incident had minimal impact on the network -- temporarily taking only a few relays offline -- it has been a frustrating issue for many relay operators. However, I want to reassure everyone that this disruption had no effect on Tor users whatsoever. We're incredibly fortunate to have such a skilled and committed group of relay operators standing with Tor. Thank you all for your resilience, ongoing support and for making the Tor network possible by running relays. Gus -- The Tor Project Community Team Lead

11 18

Re: Raspberry Pi 4
by Keifer Bly 11 Nov '24

11 Nov '24

Ok thanks all. --Keifer On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, 6:43 AM Michael Wächter via tor-relays < tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org> wrote: > Hi all, > I’m running a relay on a Pi 4 now for almost 2 years, almost no issues at > all. Average CPU load 40 %, average bandwidth 5 MB. > Updating to a newer version of tor is a bit tricky. > > Rads > > Michael > > > Am 04.11.2024 um 12:40 schrieb jl2238--- via tor-relays < > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org>: > > It works. My relay is running on a Raspberry Pi 4B with 4 GB RAM. Bandwith > for the relay is 2 Mbit/s, CPU Load of the relay is about 20 % > > > Am 02.11.24 um 02:15 schrieb Keifer Bly: > > Hi, > > So I am wondering, is a Raspberry Pi 4 a recommended device to run a tor > relay on? In terms of traffic load, etc? Thanks. > --Keifer > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing listtor-relays@lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >

2 2

Running a middle relay on home network
by Keifer Bly 11 Nov '24

11 Nov '24

Hi, So wondering for running a middle relay on a raspberry pi esque micro computer, what are the recommed maximum bandwidth for running a middle relay on a hole network (by a stock isp router, etc?)? Thanks. --Keifer

3 2