- tor-relays - lists.torproject.org

Cannot Access Tor
by Ravi Nimsons 08 May '16

08 May '16

Hi I have tried everything possible following information on all the forums available and am frustrated as I cannot access Tor. Whenever I try to initiate Tor, I can see the processes running firefox.exe for Tor Browser and tor.exe but I do not get the initial pop-up dialog to connect to Tor. I have Norton Internet Security and have even deleted and reinstalled the “trusted” programs for the firewall to allow access to. Please help. Thank you

2 1

Search warrant and house search because of an exit in DE
by spriver 05 May '16

05 May '16

Hi, earlier today (this morning) German police officials (I live in Germany) came to my flat and searched my rooms. The official accuse was because of me being suspected to fraud (about 400€ of eBooks were purchased and not payed via my exit relay on 2015-11-02 (data is available that my relay was up at the time on exonerator and collector)). USB sticks and my notebook were taken as evidence. I was being asked (I don't have to do that) to unlock my notebook in front of officials and do a file search that the files are not present and to tell them (and bring evidence) that the corresponding IP address was a Tor relay at the time at the phone later today. Of course I do not have those eBooks on my notebook and the data showing that my relay was up is available. What should I do now? Cheers!

12 19

OpenSSL Padding oracle in AES-NI CBC MAC check (CVE-2016-2107)
by Dhalgren Tor 04 May '16

04 May '16

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt In general I understand that padding oracle attacks are principally a hazard for browser communications. Am assuming that updating OpenSSL for this fix is not an urgent priority for a Tor Relay. If anyone knows different please comment.

2 1

Port knocking for SSH on a Tor node
by Cristian Consonni 03 May '16

03 May '16

Hi, I am putting together a blog post with tips and tools for administrating a node and then I have discovered the technique of "port knocking". I decided to experiment with it and I have created a guide that puts it together with the default configuration for iptables by torservers/moba[1a][1b]. I have searched on this list and the topic of port knocking has been discussed very rarely (last discussions in late 2014). This is the guide I have writen: https://balist.es/blog/2016/05/03/configure-port-knocking-for-a-tor-node/ I would like to receive some feedback and I hope this can be useful for other operators. Cristian [1a]: https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server [1b]: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/torservers/server-config-templates/master…

3 4

Re: [tor-relays] Port knocking for SSH on a Tor node
by Diarmaid McManus 03 May '16

03 May '16

I agree there have not been any updates, but if you look at the issues list it doesn't seem there are any breaking bugs that would require a patch. Regular port knocking is certainly an improvement over nothing, but it's vulnerable to an attacker in some conditions as mentioned in the readme. So long as you're aware of the (minimal!) pitfalls I'm happy! :) On 3 May 2016 3:47 PM, "Cristian Consonni" <kikkocristian(a)gmail.com> wrote: 2016-05-03 16:25 GMT+02:00 Diarmaid McManus <diarmaidmcmanus(a)gmail.com>: > I would no longer recommend port knocking using a static port sequence. > Instead, I'd recommend knockknock by moxie, > https://github.com/moxie0/knockknock/blob/master/README I have discovered knockknock project just little before finishing the post and I really liked the reasoning behind the project, I will try it. However I was almost done with writing the post and I though it could be useful nonetheless because you do not need any additional software to set it up. One thing concerns me is that it seems that knockknock is unmaintained at the moment (no commits since 3.5 years). Cristian _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] https://itldc.com/
by Neel Chauhan 02 May '16

02 May '16

>Perhaps you could answer that with clear steps to put a restricted port list which blocks the known offenders and web page explaining that it is only a proxy and complaints should be directed at you? >One VPS business accepted those from me and offered to help as well. >Others did as you found and cut ten VPS off just after I paid while the policy on their site allowed exits. Second this. I host a Tor exit node on ITL and still have my Tor exit node after a year with them, just because I am willing to block IP addresses I get complaints from. I also have another VPS with CoolHousing (through their Virtual Server Lite brand) and I do the same (block IP addresses I get complaints from). -Neel Chauhan https://www.neelc.org/

4 3

Re: [tor-relays] Fw: new message
by eliaz 02 May '16

02 May '16

> On 5/2/2016 6:26:34 AM, tor-relays-bounces(a)lists.torproject.org (sam(a)pizzey.me) wrote: > > Hello! > > You have a new message, please read <http://test.tokapp.es/son.php?1ih86> > > tor-relays-bounces(a)lists.torproject.org Looks like spam to me.

3 2

Fwd: https://itldc.com/
by Markus Koch 02 May '16

02 May '16

Thats my history: http://imgur.com/x6wNxl8 As I said, one abuse .. It was a scary Root/standard PW on port 22 and then kick ... Mail here: Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162) -------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues. At least: 1) Registrations and ordering service from another companies for spam sending 2) Fraud 3) Malicious activity like scans and hacking. Some of these incidents already resolved, some still under investigation. I need to note that we unable to provide service to you. We expect normal usage of our services, but (as I see) this is not possible in your case. Your VDS's will be stopped within next few hours. Regards, Dmitry 2016-05-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 dan <dan9(a)mailbox.org>: > the actual sentence should be: > > can you resend your email to the list please (not just to me) -- thanks > > On May 2, 2016 at 12:15 PM dan <dan9(a)mailbox.org> wrote: > > you you resend this email to the list please - thanks > >> On May 2, 2016 at 12:09 PM Markus Koch <niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I got the one and only abuse mail after a week and I sent them the Tor >> Exit Node default template. They were fine with it and I never heard >> from them again until yesterday with my kick. No clue why I did not >> receive any more Abuse mails. And I cant block IPs I dont know about. >> 3 servers are dead now and my next Tor Exit servers will be >> bulletproof ... >> >> >> >> 2016-05-02 14:04 GMT+02:00 dan <dan9(a)mailbox.org>: >> > >> > >> >> On May 2, 2016 at 11:51 AM Markus Koch <niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I got ONE abuse mail and after this I was kicked with the msg I posted >> >> ... >> > >> > You also posted previously (on Sat Apr 23 13:13:52 UTC 2016) thatyou >> > received already >> > abuse emails an that they are relaxed: >> > >> > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-April/009142.html >> > >> > Can you clarify? >> > >> > Did you suggest to them that you can block the offended IP address? > > >

1 0

Fw: new message
by tor-relays-bounces＠lists.torproject.org 02 May '16

02 May '16

Hello! You have a new message, please read <http://test.tokapp.es/son.php?1ih86> tor-relays-bounces(a)lists.torproject.org

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] "support team" address?
by eliaz 02 May '16

02 May '16

> On 5/1/2016 4:52:12 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor (teor2345(a)gmail.com) wrote: > > > On 1 May 2016, at 16:52, eliaz <eliaz(a)riseup.net> wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > >> On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (moritz(a)torservers.net) wrote: > >>> On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote: > >>> I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor > >>> unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support > >>> team." So, what's the address? > >>=20 > >> This is the list for relay operation, not Tor Browser questions. = > There > >> is currently no good list for support questions, but tor-talk is a > >> better "catch all" than tor-relays. > > [snip] > >=20 > > I neglected to mention that tor crashes upon restart when I'm running = > my > > bridge. Restarting in client mode works fine. So should I send the > > details to tor-talk or tor-relays? > > Please log a bug at https://trac.torproject.org and email the tor-dev = > list about the bug number. > It's the best way to collect details about crashes. Thanks Tim. I'll do that after I determine under which conditions the crash & recovery are reproducible. I don't know when I'll be able to make time for that, as the recovery seems to require a lot of steps, some of which may in fact not be necessary. - eliaz

2 1

https://itldc.com/
by Markus Koch 02 May '16

02 May '16

its fair to say they are fed up and dont want to have any Tor Exit Nodes anymore. Just revieved: Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162) -------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues. At least: 1) Registrations and ordering service from another companies for spam sending 2) Fraud 3) Malicious activity like scans and hacking. Some of these incidents already resolved, some still under investigation. I need to note that we unable to provide service to you. We expect normal usage of our services, but (as I see) this is not possible in your case. Your VDS's will be stopped within next few hours. I am less pissed on the ISP and much more pissed on the user ... Markus

3 3

Re: [tor-relays] https://itldc.com/
by Tristan 01 May '16

01 May '16

Like it says in the exit relay guide, some ISPs find it easier to give you the boot rather than deal with constant abuse complaints. On May 1, 2016 12:13 PM, "Markus Koch" <niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> wrote: This isp was exit friendly 2 weeks ago. It was posted around 3 weeks ago (look at up) in (this mailing list) and they were fine with it. Now they are not, just letting you guys know that they changed their minds. Sent from my iPad > On 01 May 2016, at 19:02, Xza <yandereson(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Did you ask them what they say about Tor exit nodes? > It's common that they don't want Exit nodes on their VPS services. > Should always ask ISPs beforehand and how they deal with abuse complains. > > >> On May 1, 2016 6:12:29 PM GMT+02:00, Markus Koch < niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >> its fair to say they are fed up and dont want to have any Tor Exit >> Nodes anymore. Just revieved: >> >> Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162) >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> Hi, >> >> We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues. >> >> At least: >> >> 1) Registrations and ordering service from another companies for spam >> sending >> 2) Fraud >> 3) Malicious activity like scans and hacking. >> >> Some of these incidents already resolved, some still under >> investigation. >> >> I need to note that we unable to provide service to you. We expect >> normal usage of our services, but (as I see) this is not possible in >> your case. >> >> Your VDS's will be stopped within next few hours. >> >> I am less pissed on the ISP and much more pissed on the user ... >> >> Markus >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > - -- > PGP : 29A4CE52 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQI4BAEBCgAiGxxEbyA8eWFuZGVyZXNvbkByaXNldXAubmV0PgUCVyY2lAAKCRBI > of/XNyszSn31D/47zKuHHIkvNSPsMYUNL/Np7iVUBRdi2oBMnFuQrg12ZlgMAE7P > yRQPTFZbwznmlwQU/ZZjZXroiT4QNMPjShR/C7gTnyBVMROnZOfwGxcc5ASeXgcz > 7GexNZUI82rv+PkVg3OW5rrdR5g+I0U14lN2w4ewbGaunDkLiSP3GBoqoSc6WbAj > JoPUT03Hj920G8+QqRNiPyWGWMnCEEB08xv5wfOcBTvw72hFcvp8hLiE/yXM1BRN > vB8RC18AGsj46H2h4yoqVdU+Y1gWxs/XrhtQw6zF8ERINnE2ErLjpCm3vcqKYIo6 > ZDXEWBGnt1xJJlpsPlDuh1ix0KfwIrW6ODD5ON6cv7wpmOuxaELSJrcOClw7a8ND > NltKvuyuMMTj6pwJDbTGz6HliyGhq7CkWzbCORs7DPxYURxzUzpnHC8U5111xjNH > LzI7L4S8TTD8+U+Q69d/5FKuVBrsfmK2JcuOLZ8QqE3c2jTjw6mUhSMfkHkXAlpe > wtb6nbUJG20H35FkltHV5mdKS4qew1Yd7D7CsWNVZ1uIhJPdMqoAi82TO+zUvRj8 > N48jfhB89ihHFy3ja0cDQqa6rBR4iIS4UCWdKTLq9UJBxNznIkXwpqQMgkjDwiPs > MBVECM55in87wZ8V/QuuNe9euhawaUIJEuKORWAmdwbkigTJ4FurnrFMvw== > =nhzL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] "support team" address?
by eliaz 01 May '16

01 May '16

> On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (moritz(a)torservers.net) wrote: > > On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote: > > I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor > > unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support > > team." So, what's the address? > > This is the list for relay operation, not Tor Browser questions. There > is currently no good list for support questions, but tor-talk is a > better "catch all" than tor-relays. [snip] I neglected to mention that tor crashes upon restart when I'm running my bridge. Restarting in client mode works fine. So should I send the details to tor-talk or tor-relays?

2 1

Slow bandwidth, bridge + obfsproxy project (+Socks for LAN?)
by Petrusko 01 May '16

01 May '16

Hey all, 1. Coming here to learn some quick lessons about bridges+obfsproxy. I'm thinking about that when I see some slow upload bandwidth speed like at home for example. Running a relay will be a bottleneck... so a bridge will be more useful... (less than 1Mbits/s upload :s ) 2. If computers running bridges are not 24/24 powered, will it be useful for people ? When I see the "lifecycle of a relay" article, I can understand a relay will be useful if it's always available, but what about a bridge ? (office hours for example) 3. Will this bridge+obfsproxy can be useful for the LAN computers, with Socks for example for LAN connections, to redirect traffic to Tor ? Those services can run together on the same instance ? ex on the doc: SocksPort 4000 #example for the LAN connection (default = 0) ORPort auto BridgeRelay 1 Exitpolicy reject *:* 4. I'm confused, the "bridge" is acting like a relay ? (like a router on a network, 50% upload / 50% download...?). Or like a hidden door to contact the Tor network, and the client will only use relays after without the bridge ? (I don't want this server to be a bottleneck...!) Many thx for your help and your thoughts about this little contribution! -- Petrusko PubKey EBE23AE5 C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5

2 2

Re: [tor-relays] "support team" address?
by eliaz 01 May '16

01 May '16

Thanks for the precise help, Roger. some relies interleaved: > On 4/30/2016 7:41:48 PM, Roger Dingledine (arma(a)mit.edu) wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 02:51:27PM +0000, eliaz wrote: > > I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor > > unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support > > team." So, what's the address? > > We have alas stopped operating the support team, since we didn't have > funding to keep it going, and it was being overwhelmed by users who wanted > the same things over and over. We've instead been focusing on cleaning > up our documentation, improving user experience, etc in hopes that in > the future we'll have fewer users who think contacting the support desk > is the right first move. > > I've opened https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18939 > so we can confuse fewer users with that phrase. Aha, that must be why previous requests to rt.torproject.org went unanswered? Water over the dam... > In your case, my guess is that you added something to your torrc file, > which caused your Tor to fail when it restarted it. Tor Browser isn't > really meant to be used along with the phrase "when restarting Tor", > so I'm afraid you are in expert territory. :) Of course. I'd think it would be useful to know how if possible to do this for those who run torbrowser only on windows. > > Also, Tor Browser isn't a relay by default, and it's a poor way to operate > a relay. Who would know? It's nowhere stated in the documentation... > You'll do much better with a Tor package like the debian package: > https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian I'm running debian already as a VM, & running tails off a usb stick so I can know how to help those who need that. The 24/7 low-power rig on which I currently run bridges runs on an old Intel Atom D2550 processor which doesn't accept graphical UI linux & I haven't gotten around to looking into command-line versions. If anyone can suggest one I'd appreciate it. >And lastly, > https://www.torproject.org/about/contact#support > has some suggestions for how to find help. Did that, also will follow Moritz's suggestions re IRC & stackexchange. Really, running bridges intelligently & learning what's going on is not straightforward at all. I keep at it out of perversity. - eliaz

1 0

"support team" address?
by eliaz 30 Apr '16

30 Apr '16

I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support team." So, what's the address?

3 2

does it make sense to close unused ports at a tor relay with iptables ?
by Toralf Förster 28 Apr '16

28 Apr '16

6 8

Announcing a shutdown of a relay
by Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner 28 Apr '16

28 Apr '16

Hi @all, can I announce the shutdown of my relay to the network so clients select a new guard? Thanks, ~Josef

4 6

MaxMemInQueues is set to 256 MB
by pa011 27 Apr '16

27 Apr '16

One of my small servers is running on Debian8 for weeks now. The memory is 256MB only. Arm is showing (Linux 3.16.0-4-a...) Tor 0.2.7.6 (recommended) cpu: 20.0% tor, 5.7% arm mem: 136 MB (56.5%) pid: 560 while some 20-40 Mbit/s are running through. The relay is connected to some 100Mbits/s. Could somebody please explain what is the maximum throughput I could possibly reach with "MaxMemInQueues is set to 256 MB" ? I guess it does not make sense to change the MaxMemInQueues while memory is only 256MB? If in case I cant use the whole 100Mbit/s - what would be the minimum requirement in memory I would need as the CPU is just working on a 20 percent level? Thank you . Paul

2 1

Suggestion for Tor exit friendly ISP
by Tor-Node.net 25 Apr '16

25 Apr '16

Hi! I have come across a Tor friendly VPS provider in Norway. They allow exits. At the moment they host no other Tor relay than mine. I've tried adding them to the Good/Bad ISP wiki, but get trapped be som anti-spam filter even when not logged in via Tor. Is this list an appropriate way to reccommend them? I'm not affiliated with this company but don't want to spam the list. Their permanent offer is a VPS with dedicated and unmetered 1Gbps connection per VPS, price per month is 149 NOK (~ 18 USD / ~ 16 EUR). My relay is at the moment CPU constrained, pushing about 10 MB/s. Kind regards TorNodeNET

3 2

IPv6 bridges (without IPv4 ORPort but IPv4 connectivity)
by erwin rolf 25 Apr '16

25 Apr '16

Hi, I'm running relays on servers which have a single IPv4 address and many IPv6 addresses. I guess this is a common setup in nowadays hosting environments since you get IPv6 addresses for free. I'm wondering whether these additional (currently unused) IPv6 addresses could be usefull to run bridges on them. Even though there are reports that say bridges are blocked on an IP:port basis (not IP only) I would prefere to not use the IPv4 address for the bridge at all since there runs a public relay on it already (something that is blocked already). I would like to run a config with an IPv6 ORPort only. To see whether this is currently supported I read: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/IPv6RelayHowto unfortunately the page reads: > Note that you'll have to have an IPv4 OR port configured as well, or your bridge will bootstrap but leave its clients hanging at 50% (see #4847) https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4847 so my planned setup would not work I guess. A workaround would probably be to bind to IPv4 as well and ignore the fact that the IPv4 bridge wont be useable since it runs on the same IP as the public relay, but I'd rather wait for a fix of #4847. #4847 has the milestone set to unknown "0.2.???" If there are other options, please me know.

2 2

Reading check.torproject
by eliaz 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

In looking at the check.torproject.org page on the browser/machine that runs my bridge, I'm used to seeing the same IP address a.b.c.d on the check page ("Your IP address appears to be: a.b.c.d") as in the exit on the path drop-down. But today for several hours a.b.c.d showed on the drop-down but a different address w.x.y.z appeared on the page. Opening up atlas gave a "no results" error until I entered a.b.c.d manually; and w.x.y.z was no tor node; it turned out to belong to a VPN provider which was also poking my ports. Is this discrepancy normal? Should be worried about it? - eliaz

3 3

Re: [tor-relays] Using your own Relay as Entry Node
by stealth＠nym.mixmin.net 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I too would like to know, if using one's own relay as an Entry Node WITHOUT any of the Proxy shenanigans is good practice to maintain one's anonymity. I want to hard code my relay in torrc as the only entry node. Should this be done? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXGsFTAAoJEH1gNwhiMDZuxzUP/i9t56ZLG246vyV8Bb3Lz/9o bh/03OHrfKG+ZrgBKRu+K3pDxR6iPdKF5unvrRkmO8AOa056rUKNH0uBu/Ssawtx Bet0SDJT3YlPOYLhJAjO1Vy3nHgLxBwVGVs9z0pyS1yvcgufrmTQoLnpiTEtXLjg KvR2DqmBbgDvBJB6EX6GLSdI8agNsV92XD/nPkV6Z1lOZO6B2dzkSnaH7PyqEeQo vhhW4s9z28r//mbk59FvTB/LKbsvRIMh2PA1I3rdUonaDbBT/d1NCl2ICjvPKg2x CUGuF2Sjv6Rcw64BugvPBEUAKkb73woX0iQ52Ce1aowe3mx2xdnG4SAg5o4xwEr2 ORUG+4kGW+ds4kOaCDfkrjkSuqRw25zXhLLOTiaaHhKtTxFcbEoEcUfFL2z3ERDr sFkmFF1ce0fGzn7FBt6k+GR6c6XwmEu3orf/smW+JD669gNWeGyTWcN4vmml4Vge E9EwKRYT2Qk4VG5S6kg84eqJKSWIoqTR4ffISxpc5XwHqeWigBBhLMn8OP+4BqZP TjyW1Q/6/0O2mOISuhtyuvlbxvVRWO/Lwp2MWhAAaTSnMTyYHVJeO+JXl/h3zORs 4qCWAe9QkO9VheCMaIFw3kTVNWO09UZEvGgY5qtsNhwygABYZ0q5SpL1i49ros0v 8p0//o07gYqlItaLwDP6 =nshE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Entry Node Problem
by stealth＠nym.mixmin.net 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just added my relay fingerprint to my torrc file and my Tor Browser will not load. I must have the syntax wrong. My entry is below: EntryNodes (Myfingerprintgoeshere) Is this the correct syntax? If I want to add several entry nodes, do I just separate them with a comma? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXGxTTAAoJEH1gNwhiMDZuJioQAIicOI9IG2cAb8ILMr0ZpdS9 7eEsvN9mJj2ojrsVTQfmYK7559/bu3Q/wfXdh5bcnahZ6xvda7U2yuBo2XQFXwmh o8cpLyR5DJ0FOlisgSa3A/Hr5lXCFQ8/65jf51pYAuADvqhyt8HoVJT8M5nK3C+3 U7ge9lKXLRGvcfcgdSBL52PuZoALw3HLCkEqG/YA3ZZ9BDB7GEo43QLz6B/kSNtK asld5bde0hqL5+n6fcx9mqEdJahOKhaOpMR2haqeKbza7ojXkpnsgk029Ifltg5E n7U+deTbN6fSOKAAPUmkEEqJL9lJsG+jvpmTrVC0fba8v2AAd5F0mnHkQdGO/sOL WfRsThV6ROs/1UQQ7ohut5S8oFbFXutpH8BCeW+pBWxl61N3jZEGgpCEbO7Vug81 0pXNv7hiVeZWjpq0GQY1fi7VoO+THq8jL84jwY8rd6h4CXhNzH4im8qwrEtLtY7J b/J0tB7903xcwbr3YikMDJJWnIdTFI511XsopDa+kfxE66cxN+wjBdmJ9LYB0NuK avWKp0RWpeLukzHT0uZueKub1lEBEu/o4305GJooNo0XuiAixcPGcFvWs/QFe+MO SgBsMlde8zWRB3JxAtS+pR9xU9cm8Eo4h9wq8WwMRqTfIqCGViNIIcl8G5gd8lpx +Z5qTFzeWOz4BJ5tb8ai =vDfu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] Unmetered brandwith hosting
by dan 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

> Any more recommendations were I can buy cheap VPS servers were I can run an exit relay https://www.itldc.com they allow exits and offer cheap unmetered VPSes

2 1