Hi Network Health team,
A relay operator recently raised some concerns about a large exit
operator on the tor-relays list:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2020-February/018151.html
I did some analysis of the largest ASes:
* 23% of guards and 22% of middles (Hetzner)
* 16% of guards and 12% of middles (OVH)
* 10% if guards (Online)
* 20% of exits (Joshua Peter McQuistan)
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#aggregate/as
I think the "Joshua Peter McQuistan" AS is all one operator.
I've opened this ticket to check for bandwidth authority configuration
or location issues:
Are bandwidth authorities concentrating too much bandwidth in one area?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33351
I've also opened this ticket to check for sbws bugs:
Is sbws weighting some relays too high?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33350
Ultimately, I think the answer is "Let's help people run more exits."
(After we finish Sponsor 55, maybe our next step should be IPv6-only
bridges and exits.)
I'm not sure if you want to impose some kind of limits on ASes or
operators in the meantime. I suggest that 20% of Guards, Middles, or
Exits is a useful limit.
T
--
teor
----------------------------------------------------------------------