- tor-commits - lists.torproject.org

[tor/master] Do not try to download descriptors for bridges in ExcludeNodes.
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit b59a289365169cca228566826f19838403320cb2 Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 18:12:26 2011 -0400 Do not try to download descriptors for bridges in ExcludeNodes. --- src/or/circuitbuild.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/circuitbuild.c b/src/or/circuitbuild.c index 714d636..4832cae 100644 --- a/src/or/circuitbuild.c +++ b/src/or/circuitbuild.c @@ -4539,6 +4539,24 @@ bridge_add_from_config(const tor_addr_t *addr, uint16_t port, char *digest) smartlist_add(bridge_list, b); } +/** Return true iff routerset contains the bridge bridge. */ +static int +routerset_contains_bridge(const routerset_t *routerset, + const bridge_info_t *bridge) +{ + int result; + extend_info_t *extinfo; + tor_assert(bridge); + if (!routerset) + return 0; + + extinfo = extend_info_alloc( + NULL, bridge->identity, NULL, &bridge->addr, bridge->port); + result = routerset_contains_extendinfo(routerset, extinfo); + extend_info_free(extinfo); + return result; +} + /** If digest is one of our known bridges, return it. */ static bridge_info_t * find_bridge_by_digest(const char *digest) @@ -4557,6 +4575,7 @@ static void launch_direct_bridge_descriptor_fetch(bridge_info_t *bridge) { char *address; + or_options_t *options = get_options(); if (connection_get_by_type_addr_port_purpose( CONN_TYPE_DIR, &bridge->addr, bridge->port, @@ -4564,7 +4583,13 @@ launch_direct_bridge_descriptor_fetch(bridge_info_t *bridge) return; /* it's already on the way */ address = tor_dup_addr(&bridge->addr); - /* XXX022-1090 if we ExcludeNodes this bridge, should this step fail? -RD */ + if (routerset_contains_bridge(options->ExcludeNodes, bridge)) { + download_status_mark_impossible(&bridge->fetch_status); + log_warn(LD_APP, "Not using bridge at %s: it is in ExcludeNodes.", + safe_str_client(fmt_addr(&bridge->addr))); + return; + } + directory_initiate_command(address, &bridge->addr, bridge->port, 0, 0, /* does not matter */ @@ -4605,6 +4630,12 @@ fetch_bridge_descriptors(or_options_t *options, time_t now) if (!download_status_is_ready(&bridge->fetch_status, now, IMPOSSIBLE_TO_DOWNLOAD)) continue; /* don't bother, no need to retry yet */ + if (routerset_contains_bridge(options->ExcludeNodes, bridge)) { + download_status_mark_impossible(&bridge->fetch_status); + log_warn(LD_APP, "Not using bridge at %s: it is in ExcludeNodes.", + safe_str_client(fmt_addr(&bridge->addr))); + continue; + } /* schedule another fetch as if this one will fail, in case it does */ download_status_failed(&bridge->fetch_status, 0);

1 0

[tor/master] When cannibalizing a circuit, make sure it has no ExcludeNodes on it
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit 6afad6b691d577fba2fe88f2fe9ed76a2f80002d Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 19:58:28 2011 -0400 When cannibalizing a circuit, make sure it has no ExcludeNodes on it This could happen if StrictNodes was 0 and we were forced to pick an excluded node as the last hop of the circuit. --- src/or/circuitlist.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/circuitlist.c b/src/or/circuitlist.c index 42073fb..ce324ca 100644 --- a/src/or/circuitlist.c +++ b/src/or/circuitlist.c @@ -923,6 +923,7 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info, int need_uptime = (flags & CIRCLAUNCH_NEED_UPTIME) != 0; int need_capacity = (flags & CIRCLAUNCH_NEED_CAPACITY) != 0; int internal = (flags & CIRCLAUNCH_IS_INTERNAL) != 0; + or_options_t *options = get_options(); /* Make sure we're not trying to create a onehop circ by * cannibalization. */ @@ -933,11 +934,6 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info, "capacity %d, internal %d", purpose, need_uptime, need_capacity, internal); - /* XXX022-1090 We should make sure that when we cannibalize a circuit, it - * contains no excluded nodes. (This is possible if StrictNodes is 0, and - * we thought we needed to use an excluded exit node for, say, a directory - * operation.) -NM */ - for (_circ=global_circuitlist; _circ; _circ = _circ->next) { if (CIRCUIT_IS_ORIGIN(_circ) && _circ->state == CIRCUIT_STATE_OPEN && @@ -966,6 +962,19 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info, hop=hop->next; } while (hop!=circ->cpath); } + if (options->ExcludeNodes) { + /* Make sure no existing nodes in the circuit are excluded for + * general use. (This may be possible if StrictNodes is 0, and we + * thought we needed to use an otherwise excluded node for, say, a + * directory operation.) */ + crypt_path_t *hop = circ->cpath; + do { + if (routerset_contains_extendinfo(options->ExcludeNodes, + hop->extend_info)) + goto next; + hop = hop->next; + } while (hop != circ->cpath); + } if (!best || (best->build_state->need_uptime && !need_uptime)) best = circ; next: ;

1 0

[tor/master] warn if we launch too many circuits for a given stream
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit f7a5bc16d689e8b919285c66cd0f07a6694bcc69 Author: Roger Dingledine <arma(a)torproject.org> Date: Tue Apr 26 22:18:01 2011 -0400 warn if we launch too many circuits for a given stream --- changes/bug1090-launch-warning | 5 +++++ src/or/circuituse.c | 13 ++++++++++++- src/or/or.h | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/changes/bug1090-launch-warning b/changes/bug1090-launch-warning new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f3fbcb --- /dev/null +++ b/changes/bug1090-launch-warning @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + o Minor features: + - Keep track of how many times we launch a new circuit to handle + a given stream. Too many launches could indicate an inconsistency + between our "launch a circuit to handle this stream" logic and our + "attach our stream to one of the available circuits" logic. diff --git a/src/or/circuituse.c b/src/or/circuituse.c index cc4a739..fd1cf6b 100644 --- a/src/or/circuituse.c +++ b/src/or/circuituse.c @@ -1409,7 +1409,18 @@ circuit_get_open_circ_or_launch(edge_connection_t *conn, extend_info_free(extend_info); - if (desired_circuit_purpose != CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL) { + if (desired_circuit_purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL) { + /* We just caused a circuit to get built because of this stream. + * If this stream has caused a _lot_ of circuits to be built, that's + * a bad sign: we should tell the user. */ + if (conn->num_circuits_launched < NUM_CIRCUITS_LAUNCHED_THRESHOLD && + ++conn->num_circuits_launched == NUM_CIRCUITS_LAUNCHED_THRESHOLD) + log_warn(LD_BUG, "The application request to %s:%d has launched " + "%d circuits without finding one it likes.", + escaped_safe_str_client(conn->socks_request->address), + conn->socks_request->port, + conn->num_circuits_launched); + } else { /* help predict this next time */ rep_hist_note_used_internal(time(NULL), need_uptime, 1); if (circ) { diff --git a/src/or/or.h b/src/or/or.h index 50a1223..7d354c8 100644 --- a/src/or/or.h +++ b/src/or/or.h @@ -1151,6 +1151,13 @@ typedef struct edge_connection_t { * already retried several times. */ uint8_t num_socks_retries; +#define NUM_CIRCUITS_LAUNCHED_THRESHOLD 10 + /** Number of times we've launched a circuit to handle this stream. If + * it gets too high, that could indicate an inconsistency between our + * "launch a circuit to handle this stream" logic and our "attach our + * stream to one of the available circuits" logic. */ + unsigned int num_circuits_launched:4; + /** True iff this connection is for a DNS request only. */ unsigned int is_dns_request:1;

1 0

[tor/master] Merge branch 'bug1090-manpage-squashed' into bug1090-part1-squashed
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit 8f6cb933b6a8ee63f2e208ec43933ad27afa2af0 Merge: c49f660 2ac768e Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Wed Apr 27 13:44:55 2011 -0400 Merge branch 'bug1090-manpage-squashed' into bug1090-part1-squashed doc/tor.1.txt | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

1 0

[tor/master] better user-facing warnings for unexpected last hops
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit b8b557dcb2bf719976858589345f08fffbab13e3 Author: Roger Dingledine <arma(a)torproject.org> Date: Tue Apr 26 22:48:00 2011 -0400 better user-facing warnings for unexpected last hops these still aren't perfect, but we won't know how to correct them until we start experiencing surprised users. --- src/or/circuitbuild.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/circuitbuild.c b/src/or/circuitbuild.c index 6401e71..90572d5 100644 --- a/src/or/circuitbuild.c +++ b/src/or/circuitbuild.c @@ -2878,7 +2878,6 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) or_options_t *options = get_options(); routerset_t *rs = options->ExcludeNodes; const char *description; - int domain = LD_CIRC; uint8_t purpose = circ->_base.purpose; if (circ->build_state->onehop_tunnel) @@ -2914,7 +2913,6 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_READY_INTRO_ACKED: case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_JOINED: description = "chosen rendezvous point"; - domain = LD_BUG; break; case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER: rs = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; @@ -2924,18 +2922,24 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) if (routerset_contains_extendinfo(rs, exit)) { /* We should never get here if StrictNodes is set to 1. */ - if (options->StrictNodes) - log_warn(LD_BUG, "Using an excluded node with StrictNodes set. " - "Please report the following log message to the " - "developers."); - log_fn(LOG_WARN, domain, "Using %s '%s' which is listed in " - "ExcludeNodes%s, because no other options were available. To " - "prevent this, set the StrictNodes configuration option." - "(Circuit purpose is %d)", - description,exit->nickname, - rs==options->ExcludeNodes?"":" or ExcludeExitNodes", - (int)purpose); - circuit_log_path(LOG_WARN, domain, circ); + if (options->StrictNodes) { + log_warn(LD_BUG, "Using %s '%s' which is listed in ExcludeNodes%s, " + "even though StrictNodes is set. Please report. " + "(Circuit purpose: %s)", + description, exit->nickname, + rs==options->ExcludeNodes?"":" or ExcludeExitNodes", + circuit_purpose_to_string(purpose)); + } else { + log_warn(LD_CIRC, "Using %s '%s' which is listed in " + "ExcludeNodes%s, because no better options were available. To " + "prevent this (and possibly break your Tor functionality), " + "set the StrictNodes configuration option. " + "(Circuit purpose: %s)", + description, exit->nickname, + rs==options->ExcludeNodes?"":" or ExcludeExitNodes", + circuit_purpose_to_string(purpose)); + } + circuit_log_path(LOG_WARN, LD_CIRC, circ); } return;

1 0

[tor/master] Note another place that we need to fix a 1090 issue.
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit ed7c267743f2471a5a16c5ec437efda665f4c6af Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 17:08:29 2011 -0400 Note another place that we need to fix a 1090 issue. --- src/or/connection_edge.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/connection_edge.c b/src/or/connection_edge.c index 4c74426..1f5eb70 100644 --- a/src/or/connection_edge.c +++ b/src/or/connection_edge.c @@ -789,6 +789,9 @@ addressmap_ent_remove(const char *address, addressmap_entry_t *ent) static void clear_trackexithost_mappings(const char *exitname) { + /* XXXX022-1090 We need a variant of this that clears all mappings no longer + permitted because of changes to the ExcludeNodes, ExitNodes, or + ExcludeExitNodes settings. */ char *suffix; size_t suffix_len; if (!addressmap || !exitname)

1 0

[tor/master] When there is a transition in permitted nodes, apply it to trackexithosts map
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit 80adb3de507db4cd67208396e1ea301f131c1228 Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 19:43:47 2011 -0400 When there is a transition in permitted nodes, apply it to trackexithosts map IOW, if we were using TrackExitHosts, and we added an excluded node or removed a node from exitnodes, we wouldn't actually remove the mapping that points us at the new node. Also, note with an XXX022 comment a place that I think we are looking at the wrong string. --- src/or/config.c | 1 + src/or/connection_edge.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- src/or/connection_edge.h | 1 + src/or/routerlist.c | 2 +- src/or/routerlist.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/config.c b/src/or/config.c index 44cde85..f003e4d 100644 --- a/src/or/config.c +++ b/src/or/config.c @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ options_act(or_options_t *old_options) "excluded node lists. Abandoning previous circuits."); circuit_mark_all_unused_circs(); circuit_expire_all_dirty_circs(); + addressmap_clear_excluded_trackexithosts(options); } /* How long should we delay counting bridge stats after becoming a bridge? diff --git a/src/or/connection_edge.c b/src/or/connection_edge.c index f435976..5f322ca 100644 --- a/src/or/connection_edge.c +++ b/src/or/connection_edge.c @@ -789,9 +789,6 @@ addressmap_ent_remove(const char *address, addressmap_entry_t *ent) static void clear_trackexithost_mappings(const char *exitname) { - /* XXXX022-1090 We need a variant of this that clears all mappings no longer - permitted because of changes to the ExcludeNodes, ExitNodes, or - ExcludeExitNodes settings. */ char *suffix; size_t suffix_len; if (!addressmap || !exitname) @@ -802,6 +799,7 @@ clear_trackexithost_mappings(const char *exitname) tor_strlower(suffix); STRMAP_FOREACH_MODIFY(addressmap, address, addressmap_entry_t *, ent) { + /* XXXX022 HEY! Shouldn't this look at ent->new_address? */ if (ent->source == ADDRMAPSRC_TRACKEXIT && !strcmpend(address, suffix)) { addressmap_ent_remove(address, ent); MAP_DEL_CURRENT(address); @@ -811,6 +809,56 @@ clear_trackexithost_mappings(const char *exitname) tor_free(suffix); } +/** Remove all TRACKEXIT mappings from the addressmap for which the target + * host is unknown or no longer allowed. */ +void +addressmap_clear_excluded_trackexithosts(or_options_t *options) +{ + const routerset_t *allow_nodes = options->ExitNodes; + const routerset_t *exclude_nodes = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; + + if (!addressmap) + return; + if (routerset_is_empty(allow_nodes)) + allow_nodes = NULL; + if (allow_nodes == NULL && routerset_is_empty(exclude_nodes)) + return; + + STRMAP_FOREACH_MODIFY(addressmap, address, addressmap_entry_t *, ent) { + size_t len; + const char *target = ent->new_address, *dot; + char *nodename; + routerinfo_t *ri; /* XXX023 Use node_t. */ + + if (strcmpend(target, ".exit")) { + /* Not a .exit mapping */ + continue; + } else if (ent->source != ADDRMAPSRC_TRACKEXIT) { + /* Not a trackexit mapping. */ + continue; + } + len = strlen(target); + if (len < 6) + continue; /* malformed. */ + dot = target + len - 6; /* dot now points to just before .exit */ + dot = strrchr(dot, '.'); /* dot now points to the . before .exit, or NULL */ + if (!dot) { + nodename = tor_strndup(target, len-5); + } else { + nodename = tor_strndup(dot+1, strlen(dot+1)-5); + } + ri = router_get_by_nickname(nodename, 0); + tor_free(nodename); + if (!ri || + (allow_nodes && !routerset_contains_router(allow_nodes, ri)) || + routerset_contains_router(exclude_nodes, ri)) { + /* We don't know this one, or we want to be rid of it. */ + addressmap_ent_remove(address, ent); + MAP_DEL_CURRENT(address); + } + } STRMAP_FOREACH_END; +} + /** Remove all entries from the addressmap that were set via the * configuration file or the command line. */ void diff --git a/src/or/connection_edge.h b/src/or/connection_edge.h index 0b08dd0..c4ae467 100644 --- a/src/or/connection_edge.h +++ b/src/or/connection_edge.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ int connection_ap_process_transparent(edge_connection_t *conn); int address_is_invalid_destination(const char *address, int client); void addressmap_init(void); +void addressmap_clear_excluded_trackexithosts(or_options_t *options); void addressmap_clean(time_t now); void addressmap_clear_configured(void); void addressmap_clear_transient(void); diff --git a/src/or/routerlist.c b/src/or/routerlist.c index d5e8a6b..d9f099b 100644 --- a/src/or/routerlist.c +++ b/src/or/routerlist.c @@ -5474,7 +5474,7 @@ routerset_needs_geoip(const routerset_t *set) } /** Return true iff there are no entries in set. */ -static int +int routerset_is_empty(const routerset_t *set) { return !set || smartlist_len(set->list) == 0; diff --git a/src/or/routerlist.h b/src/or/routerlist.h index 3bbdc42..fec1870 100644 --- a/src/or/routerlist.h +++ b/src/or/routerlist.h @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ int routerset_parse(routerset_t *target, const char *s, void routerset_union(routerset_t *target, const routerset_t *source); int routerset_is_list(const routerset_t *set); int routerset_needs_geoip(const routerset_t *set); +int routerset_is_empty(const routerset_t *set); int routerset_contains_router(const routerset_t *set, routerinfo_t *ri); int routerset_contains_routerstatus(const routerset_t *set, routerstatus_t *rs);

1 0

[tor/master] Check transition of circuit purpose from INTRO->GENERAL if nodes are constrained
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit 79a3b3cd3719b3b87b0edbab62b256e42c7b42de Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 20:06:31 2011 -0400 Check transition of circuit purpose from INTRO->GENERAL if nodes are constrained This looked at first like another fun way around our node selection logic: if we had introduction circuits, and we wound up building too many, we would turn extras into general-purpose circuits. But when we did so, we wouldn't necessarily check whether the general-purpose circuits conformed to our node constraints. For example, the last node could totally be in ExcludedExitNodes and we wouldn't have cared... ...except that the circuit should already be internal, so it won't get user streams attached to it, so the transition should generally be allowed. Add an assert to make sure we're right about this, and have it not check whether ExitNodes is set, since that's irrelevant to internal circuits. --- src/or/rendservice.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/rendservice.c b/src/or/rendservice.c index 5b85394..cd8f9ea 100644 --- a/src/or/rendservice.c +++ b/src/or/rendservice.c @@ -1347,17 +1347,26 @@ rend_service_intro_has_opened(origin_circuit_t *circuit) } /* If we already have enough introduction circuits for this service, - * redefine this one as a general circuit. */ + * redefine this one as a general circuit or close it, depending. */ if (count_established_intro_points(serviceid) > NUM_INTRO_POINTS) { - log_info(LD_CIRC|LD_REND, "We have just finished an introduction " - "circuit, but we already have enough. Redefining purpose to " - "general."); - /* XXX022-1090: This can wind up violating ExcludeNodes/ - * ExitNodes/ExcludeExitNodes restrictions. - */ - TO_CIRCUIT(circuit)->purpose = CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL; - circuit_has_opened(circuit); - return; + or_options_t *options = get_options(); + if (options->ExcludeNodes) { + /* XXXX in some future version, we can test whether the transition is + allowed or not given the actual nodes in the circuit. But for now, + this case, we might as well close the thing. */ + log_info(LD_CIRC|LD_REND, "We have just finished an introduction " + "circuit, but we already have enough. Closing it."); + circuit_mark_for_close(TO_CIRCUIT(circuit), END_CIRC_REASON_NONE); + return; + } else { + tor_assert(circuit->build_state->is_internal); + log_info(LD_CIRC|LD_REND, "We have just finished an introduction " + "circuit, but we already have enough. Redefining purpose to " + "general; leaving as internal."); + TO_CIRCUIT(circuit)->purpose = CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL; + circuit_has_opened(circuit); + return; + } } log_info(LD_REND,

1 0

[tor/master] Simplify calls to routerset_equal
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit 128582cc1f9fd363f3fb2a96b61fde1701a56970 Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Sun Apr 3 19:13:36 2011 -0400 Simplify calls to routerset_equal The routerset_equal function explicitly handles NULL inputs, so there's no need to check inputs for NULL before calling it. Also fix a bug in routerset_equal where a non-NULL routerset with no entries didn't get counted as equal to a NULL routerset. This was untriggerable, I think, but potentially annoying down the road. --- src/or/config.c | 14 +++++--------- src/or/routerlist.c | 11 +++++++---- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/config.c b/src/or/config.c index 404e648..44cde85 100644 --- a/src/or/config.c +++ b/src/or/config.c @@ -1260,15 +1260,11 @@ options_act(or_options_t *old_options) /* Check for transitions that need action. */ if (old_options) { if ((options->UseEntryGuards && !old_options->UseEntryGuards) || - (options->ExcludeNodes && - !routerset_equal(old_options->ExcludeNodes,options->ExcludeNodes)) || - (options->ExcludeExitNodes && - !routerset_equal(old_options->ExcludeExitNodes, - options->ExcludeExitNodes)) || - (options->EntryNodes && - !routerset_equal(old_options->EntryNodes, options->EntryNodes)) || - (options->ExitNodes && - !routerset_equal(old_options->ExitNodes, options->ExitNodes)) || + !routerset_equal(old_options->ExcludeNodes,options->ExcludeNodes) || + !routerset_equal(old_options->ExcludeExitNodes, + options->ExcludeExitNodes) || + !routerset_equal(old_options->EntryNodes, options->EntryNodes) || + !routerset_equal(old_options->ExitNodes, options->ExitNodes) || options->StrictNodes != old_options->StrictNodes) { log_info(LD_CIRC, "Changed to using entry guards, or changed preferred or " diff --git a/src/or/routerlist.c b/src/or/routerlist.c index a9a216b..d5e8a6b 100644 --- a/src/or/routerlist.c +++ b/src/or/routerlist.c @@ -5473,14 +5473,12 @@ routerset_needs_geoip(const routerset_t *set) return set && smartlist_len(set->country_names); } -#if 0 /** Return true iff there are no entries in set. */ static int routerset_is_empty(const routerset_t *set) { return !set || smartlist_len(set->list) == 0; } -#endif /** Helper. Return true iff set contains a router based on the other * provided fields. Return higher values for more specific subentries: a @@ -5659,10 +5657,15 @@ routerset_to_string(const routerset_t *set) int routerset_equal(const routerset_t *old, const routerset_t *new) { - if (old == NULL && new == NULL) + if (routerset_is_empty(old) && routerset_is_empty(new)) { + /* Two empty sets are equal */ return 1; - else if (old == NULL || new == NULL) + } else if (routerset_is_empty(old) || routerset_is_empty(new)) { + /* An empty set is equal to nothing else. */ return 0; + } + tor_assert(old != NULL); + tor_assert(new != NULL); if (smartlist_len(old->list) != smartlist_len(new->list)) return 0;

1 0

[tor/master] Note a slightly less likely way to violate ExcludeNodes
by nickm＠torproject.org 28 Apr '11

28 Apr '11

commit e4689d840266088739eee39e9bef84e13c988ce9 Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org> Date: Mon Mar 28 16:51:00 2011 -0400 Note a slightly less likely way to violate ExcludeNodes --- src/or/circuitlist.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/circuitlist.c b/src/or/circuitlist.c index d11b457..42073fb 100644 --- a/src/or/circuitlist.c +++ b/src/or/circuitlist.c @@ -933,6 +933,11 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose, extend_info_t *info, "capacity %d, internal %d", purpose, need_uptime, need_capacity, internal); + /* XXX022-1090 We should make sure that when we cannibalize a circuit, it + * contains no excluded nodes. (This is possible if StrictNodes is 0, and + * we thought we needed to use an excluded exit node for, say, a directory + * operation.) -NM */ + for (_circ=global_circuitlist; _circ; _circ = _circ->next) { if (CIRCUIT_IS_ORIGIN(_circ) && _circ->state == CIRCUIT_STATE_OPEN &&

1 0