[tor-dev] Pluggable Transports 2.0, draft 1 Specification
brandon at blanu.net
Tue Mar 28 08:52:53 UTC 2017
Hi Yawning. Thank you for providing these links. This is very helpful. I
will make sure that these issues are discussed at the next specification
On Mar 28, 2017 8:36 AM, "Yawning Angel" <yawning at schwanenlied.me> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:03:47 -0500
> Brandon Wiley <brandon at blanu.net> wrote:
> > I am familiar with the dual stack problem generally, where servers
> > have both IPv4 and IPv6 IP addresses. I was not involved in any
> > conversations regarding the dual stack problem for Pluggable
> > Transports specifically. If you could point me to any documentation
> > on this issue, that would be helpful. Alternatively, if you could
> > explain what the issue is and what possible solutions you'd like to
> > see in a future Pluggable Transports specification, that is something
> > we could make happen in future specifications revisions.
> None of the things I've mentioned are new concerns, and I brought all
> of them up (and more) a long time ago back when I was giving thought
> to the PT spec.
> I've basically given up at this point, and to be honest I gave up
> shortly after I initially started making noises about improving the
> spec because it was clear that while I was trying to improve the
> existing interface while preserving the overall architecture, everyone
> else was far more interested in "lets make everything into a bunch of
> library code".
> Yawning Angel
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev at lists.torproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tor-dev