Hi all and cheers for all your replies.

I aimed to convey: I have no (longer) update issues from the moment I recently found out that the change introduced beginning of this month was NOT A CHANGE OF KEY rather this was AN UPDATE IN THE REPO ()we returned to a deb.only repos for all.

And what this implies is HUGE, because most non-pro-active servers out on the netwroks, all operators gone, who lost access to their Unattended settlements, who trusted TOR, US ALL for respecting the FEATURE of Unattendedness have now running server Eternally flown with MiM-Repo-weak servers.

I implied to ask: DO you guys realize that *Unattendness is a Feature* to build around and not to change while asking everyone to upgrade / Attend. Unattended servers are abandonned, they work and their owners could have been killed, lost interest, yet they were meant to work for us all.

What is the share of our network that will upgrade from non-deb, obsoleting repos, and who is going to Man-In-the=Middle that repos and OPA (acquire for free) ALL those lone servers.

This is a monstruous danger to the network.

Carlos.

On 8/14/24 9:07 PM, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:

...

On 8/14/24 19:44, boldsuck wrote:

...

upgrades are running or not. And that I have to reboot because of the kernel upgrade or similar. (I don't like auto reboots)

Ah, ok. I like it and have therefore unattended upgrade configured unconditionally for all packages [1].

Furthermore I do use needrestart to detect services and/or kernel requiring a reboot and do it [2].

So it works all out of the box w/o manual intervention here.

[1] https://github.com/toralf/tor-relays/blob/main/playbooks/roles/setup_common/...

[2] https://github.com/toralf/tor-relays/blob/main/playbooks/roles/setup_common/...

-- Toralf

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays --