hi, just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ... guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages? thanks
Yup, the authority operators are aware of them and think they've taken action. If these relays are still in the consensus then let us know. We're not really sure the story behind them but if you're reading mr. cloudvps operator then please reach out to us. We'd love to chat. Cheers! -Damian On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, <tor-server-creator@use.startmail.com> wrote:
hi, just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ... guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages? thanks
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ... guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages?
I wouldn't worry about these obvious spikes since they are easy to spot [1]. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/854 I find less obvious groups more interesting, like in the last few days at digital ocean [2][3][4], they stay well below DocTor's thresholds. [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/865 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/868 [4] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/898 +---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+ | first_seen | orp | dirp | ver | IP | +---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+ | 2016-01-08 17:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.74.205 | | 2016-01-10 03:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.194.235 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.140.239 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 188.166.180.156 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.83.50 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.24.176 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.46.89 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.132.53 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.151.46 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 188.166.53.165 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.244.104 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.45.232 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 45.55.164.46 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.26.159 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 107.170.250.249 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.209.33 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.224.143 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.197.118 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.245.50 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.14.28 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.62.134 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.5.151 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.118.103 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.171.126 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.231.184 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.88.175 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.82.239 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.231.125 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 162.243.141.7 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.5.39 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 192.241.223.236 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.156.244 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.225.189 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.119.46 | +---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+
since not declaring $family could cause risk to Tor-Network: action should take place if relayoperator is not responding&changing config, right? Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 20:28 schrieb nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>:
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ... guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages? I wouldn't worry about these obvious spikes since they are easy to spot [1].
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/854
I find less obvious groups more interesting, like in the last few days at digital ocean [2][3][4], they stay well below DocTor's thresholds.
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/865 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/868 [4] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/898
+---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+ | first_seen | orp | dirp | ver | IP | +---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+ | 2016-01-08 17:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.74.205 | | 2016-01-10 03:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.194.235 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.140.239 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 188.166.180.156 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.83.50 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.24.176 | | 2016-01-10 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.46.89 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.132.53 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.151.46 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 188.166.53.165 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.244.104 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.45.232 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 45.55.164.46 | | 2016-01-11 05:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.26.159 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 107.170.250.249 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.209.33 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.224.143 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.197.118 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.245.50 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.14.28 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.62.134 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.5.151 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.118.103 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.171.126 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.231.184 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.88.175 | | 2016-01-18 08:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.82.239 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 128.199.231.125 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 162.243.141.7 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 159.203.5.39 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 192.241.223.236 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 46.101.156.244 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 178.62.225.189 | | 2016-01-18 09:00:00 | 443 | 80 | 0.2.7.6 | 104.236.119.46 | +---------------------+-----+------+---------+-----------------+
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
participants (3)
-
Damian Johnson -
nusenu -
tor-server-creator＠use.startmail.com