I currently have my IPv6 connection running on port 9001. From an anti-surveillance perspective, would I be better changing the port to 80? I have IPv4 running on 443. I appreciate it!
On 31.05.2020 05:56, Josh Lawson wrote:
I currently have my IPv6 connection running on port 9001. From an anti-surveillance perspective, would I be better changing the port to 80? I have IPv4 running on 443. I appreciate it!
Take the same Port for IP & IPv6. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6 ORPort 443 ORPort [2001:4ba0:ffff:58::3]:443 -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom!
Thanks! I’m a newbie and did not think you could use the same port for both in the configuration, but it does make sense networking wise. I have update my configuration and restarted the service. On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29, <lists@for-privacy.net> wrote:
On 31.05.2020 05:56, Josh Lawson wrote:
I currently have my IPv6 connection running on port 9001. From an anti-surveillance perspective, would I be better changing the port to 80? I have IPv4 running on 443. I appreciate it!
Take the same Port for IP & IPv6. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6
ORPort 443 ORPort [2001:4ba0:ffff:58::3]:443
-- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom! _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 10.06.2020 20:32, Josh Lawson wrote:
Thanks! I’m a newbie and did not think you could use the same port for both in the configuration, but it does make sense networking wise. I have update my configuration and restarted the service.
Just imagine IPv4 and IPv6 as 2 separate paths. IPtables firewall must be created twice. Templates here: https://github.com/boldsuck/tor-relay-bootstrap/tree/master/etc/iptables I updated script for Buster just yesterday. -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom!
participants (2)
-
Josh Lawson -
lists＠for-privacy.net