Re: [tor-relays] Low bandwidth
Hi, The fingerprint is - 6E1DA4C0B0C05FB721B42329C47A20DA22908AEB I have followed some of this yes, though its a little over my head Thanks - Dan Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 10:10, <tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org
You can reach the person managing the list at tor-relays-owner@lists.torproject.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Low bandwidth (teor) 2. Re: Possible to run a tor bridge/relay via tor browser? (Keifer Bly)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:44:41 +1000 From: teor teor@riseup.net To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Low bandwidth Message-ID: 19B3A11C-D7CB-4B20-8319-8494A1FF0271@riseup.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi,
On 30 Mar 2020, at 23:00, ha3ks ha3ks@protonmail.com wrote: my relay dropped nearly all it’s bandwidth about a month ago, checking over it I can see 3 of the dir auths have given it a low consensus weighting, would that cause low bandwidth numbers? I checked my ufw in Ubuntu and it’s allowing 443 and 80.
I have seen similar reports from a few other relay operators.
What is your relay fingerprint?
Have you followed the troubleshooting instructions here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/MyRelayIsSlow
T
Hi, I'm cc'ing the network health team, so they are aware of this issue.
On 30 Mar 2020, at 23:00, ha3ks ha3ks@protonmail.com wrote: my relay dropped nearly all it’s bandwidth about a month ago, checking over it I can see 3 of the dir auths have given it a low consensus weighting, would that cause low bandwidth numbers? I checked my ufw in Ubuntu and it’s allowing 443 and 80.
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:44:41 +1000 From: teor teor@riseup.net
I have seen similar reports from a few other relay operators.
What is your relay fingerprint?
Have you followed the troubleshooting instructions here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/MyRelayIsSlow
On 31 Mar 2020, at 20:46, ha3ks <ha3ks@protonmail.com> wrote:
The fingerprint is - 6E1DA4C0B0C05FB721B42329C47A20DA22908AEB
I have followed some of this yes, though its a little over my head
I have opened a ticket in sbws to follow up this issue: sbws measures some relays 100x lower than Torflow https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33775 It could be related to these other issues: sbws does not detect changes in descriptor bandwidth values https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30733 sbws bandwidth scans should require a minimum exit bandwidth https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33009 T
I'm running into the same problem -- seeing significant drop off in bandwidth advertised. Relay family: 7AC93EC4B3725ABF7E09A903BC4A5C5C1E36517F William Pate willpate@pm.me 512-947-3311 inadequate.net ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 5:51 PM, teor <teor@riseup.net> wrote:
Hi,
I'm cc'ing the network health team, so they are aware of this issue.
On 30 Mar 2020, at 23:00, ha3ks ha3ks@protonmail.com wrote: my relay dropped nearly all it’s bandwidth about a month ago, checking over it I can see 3 of the dir auths have given it a low consensus weighting, would that cause low bandwidth numbers? I checked my ufw in Ubuntu and it’s allowing 443 and 80.
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:44:41 +1000 From: teor teor@riseup.net I have seen similar reports from a few other relay operators. What is your relay fingerprint? Have you followed the troubleshooting instructions here: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/MyRelayIsSlow
On 31 Mar 2020, at 20:46, ha3ks ha3ks@protonmail.com wrote: The fingerprint is - 6E1DA4C0B0C05FB721B42329C47A20DA22908AEB I have followed some of this yes, though its a little over my head
I have opened a ticket in sbws to follow up this issue:
sbws measures some relays 100x lower than Torflow https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33775
It could be related to these other issues:
sbws does not detect changes in descriptor bandwidth values https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30733
sbws bandwidth scans should require a minimum exit bandwidth https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33009
T
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
participants (4)
-
ha3ks -
teor -
William Pate -
Станислав