Hi! I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device? [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/or-talk@freehaven.net/msg14159.html [2] https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server Mitar -- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m
Its 2019. Doesn’t matter anymore. Get whatever network card you want and some i5/i7 or something AMD. (CPUs support AES in ASICS since 2011)
On 26. Jul 2019, at 07:31, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/or-talk@freehaven.net/msg14159.html [2] https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server
Mitar
-- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device?
https://torproject.org/relay-guide#RelayRequirements -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
About having a relay on gigabit symmetrical FTTH, you don't just need a good server, you also need a good NAT router unless you want to use your server as a NAT router as well. I don't have Sonic or Gigabit Fiber (from any ISP), but I have 300mbps symmetrical Verizon FiOS in Brooklyn, NY running a Tor middle relay. A Linksys running OpenWrt and many low-power Mini PC "firewall" boxes were a bottleneck even on 300 Mbps for Tor, despite having a powerful Xeon 4108 HPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10 and having no Verizon router in my setup. I dabbled with using my ML110 as a PF firewall (I run FreeBSD), but yesterday, I installed a HP ProDesk 400 G4 as an OPNsense firewall (because I didn't want a single point of failure, and so I can remotely access iLO). So your firewall needs to be more powerful than an average one because at least for me Tor has ~10000 connections at once, and that is with Tor only measuring half my 300Mbps. Your Gigabit will mean far more than that running Tor. So a low power HP T620 Plus or Qotom box won't work as a firewall in this case. My "bottleneck" could also be Verizon's peering that Sonic may not have. After all, Sonic supports Net Neutrality and Verizon opposes NN. About the server, I have a powerful HPE ProLiant as mentioned earlier, but like other said at minimum you need a i5/i7 CPU, or an equivalent Xeon or AMD CPU. So this means no NUCs or HPE MicroServers. -Neel === https://www.neelc.org/ On 2019-07-26 01:31, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/or-talk@freehaven.net/msg14159.html [2] https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server
Mitar
Hello, I should activate an asymmetrical FTTH connection (1000/200). I should buy a new router in order to manage properly this bandwidth. If possible, I would run an exit relay instance in the router too. I was thinking to buy an APU4 board or the RockPro64. Does someone have tested this boards as routers or exit relays? What kind of performance can I expect from such boards as exit relays or routers? Cheers Gigi Il 26/07/19 21:08, Neel Chauhan ha scritto:
About having a relay on gigabit symmetrical FTTH, you don't just need a good server, you also need a good NAT router unless you want to use your server as a NAT router as well.
I don't have Sonic or Gigabit Fiber (from any ISP), but I have 300mbps symmetrical Verizon FiOS in Brooklyn, NY running a Tor middle relay. A Linksys running OpenWrt and many low-power Mini PC "firewall" boxes were a bottleneck even on 300 Mbps for Tor, despite having a powerful Xeon 4108 HPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10 and having no Verizon router in my setup. I dabbled with using my ML110 as a PF firewall (I run FreeBSD), but yesterday, I installed a HP ProDesk 400 G4 as an OPNsense firewall (because I didn't want a single point of failure, and so I can remotely access iLO).
So your firewall needs to be more powerful than an average one because at least for me Tor has ~10000 connections at once, and that is with Tor only measuring half my 300Mbps. Your Gigabit will mean far more than that running Tor. So a low power HP T620 Plus or Qotom box won't work as a firewall in this case.
My "bottleneck" could also be Verizon's peering that Sonic may not have. After all, Sonic supports Net Neutrality and Verizon opposes NN.
About the server, I have a powerful HPE ProLiant as mentioned earlier, but like other said at minimum you need a i5/i7 CPU, or an equivalent Xeon or AMD CPU. So this means no NUCs or HPE MicroServers.
-Neel
===
On 2019-07-26 01:31, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/or-talk@freehaven.net/msg14159.html [2] https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server
Mitar
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
dns1983@riseup.net:
I should activate an asymmetrical FTTH connection (1000/200). I should buy a new router in order to manage properly this bandwidth. If possible, I would run an exit relay instance in the router too.
for the record: remember, it is strongly discouraged to run tor exit relays from home. -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
Yes, I know. Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? On 27 July 2019 18:38:00 CEST, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
I should activate an asymmetrical FTTH connection (1000/200). I should buy a new router in order to manage properly this bandwidth. If possible, I would run an exit relay instance in the router too.
for the record: remember, it is strongly discouraged to run tor exit relays from home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips?
My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home. -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips?
My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I'm through with the trials after three years straight. It's an expensive fun, but I could buy new computers, because the old devices were robbed by the police. Good luck! I had a good lawyer. Result: "not guilty!" Olaf Am 27.07.19 um 19:53 schrieb John Ricketts:
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I was contacted by the FBI, LKA, BKA and many other LEAs in Germany and never had any trouble at all. I do not think it was Germany or something went horribly wrong.
On 29. Jul 2019, at 10:34, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:
In Germany?
-----Original Message----- From: jeep665@posteo.de Sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:45:42 +0200 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] do not run exits at home
I'm through with the trials after three years straight. It's an expensive fun, but I could buy new computers, because the old devices were robbed by the police. Good luck! I had a good lawyer. Result: "not guilty!"
Olaf
Am 27.07.19 um 19:53 schrieb John Ricketts:
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ <https://twitter.com/nusenu_> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu <https://mastodon.social/@nusenu>
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Yes, it was in Germany in July 2016, until now. During the analysis some encrypted media were also examined, but not decrypted. These were later confiscated. If I had refused, the procedure would have taken even longer. In the worst case, it would have been a card-participant with the status "under investigation". I decided to sacrifice the disks and end the procedure. Olaf Am 29.07.19 um 14:45 schrieb niftybunny:
I was contacted by the FBI, LKA, BKA and many other LEAs in Germany and never had any trouble at all. I do not think it was Germany or something went horribly wrong.
On 29. Jul 2019, at 10:34, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:
In Germany?
-----Original Message----- From: jeep665@posteo.de Sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:45:42 +0200 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] do not run exits at home
I'm through with the trials after three years straight. It's an expensive fun, but I could buy new computers, because the old devices were robbed by the police. Good luck! I had a good lawyer. Result: "not guilty!"
Olaf
Am 27.07.19 um 19:53 schrieb John Ricketts:
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ <https://twitter.com/nusenu_> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu <https://mastodon.social/@nusenu>
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
What I forgot to tell you: CyberTipline / USA investigated the IP and the bad data traffic with a report to the FBI, which then informed the german BKA. The friendly boys got me then 06:20Uhr gently from the sleep ... Olaf Am 29.07.19 um 14:45 schrieb niftybunny:
I was contacted by the FBI, LKA, BKA and many other LEAs in Germany and never had any trouble at all. I do not think it was Germany or something went horribly wrong.
On 29. Jul 2019, at 10:34, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:
In Germany?
-----Original Message----- From: jeep665@posteo.de Sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:45:42 +0200 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] do not run exits at home
I'm through with the trials after three years straight. It's an expensive fun, but I could buy new computers, because the old devices were robbed by the police. Good luck! I had a good lawyer. Result: "not guilty!"
Olaf
Am 27.07.19 um 19:53 schrieb John Ricketts:
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ <https://twitter.com/nusenu_> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu <https://mastodon.social/@nusenu>
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 07/29/2019 10:54 AM, Happy Boy wrote:
What I forgot to tell you: CyberTipline / USA investigated the IP and the bad data traffic with a report to the FBI, which then informed the german BKA. The friendly boys got me then 06:20Uhr gently from the sleep ...
Professionals.
On 07/29/2019 06:45 AM, niftybunny wrote:
I was contacted by the FBI, LKA, BKA and many other LEAs in Germany and never had any trouble at all.
For the non-Teutonic amongst you, Landeskriminalamt (State Criminal Police) & Bundeskriminalamt, or Federal Criminal Police Office (Germany). You can definitely run an exit in the U.S.A., albeit not. at. home. You just need to run it under the aegis of a non-profit and have the necessary legal and technical boilerplate in place! Complaints and investigations hit the Teflon Kevlar shield forthwith. That said, I am currently running an exit in Germany, AnosognosiaRedux, which has a tad over a 0.4000% exit probability and a bit under 0.2000 consensus weight fraction. Deutschland über alles! Closer to home, you can make a pitch for Tor as the browser to preclude ad tracking to www.nextdoor.com. I've already had gotten good feedback, so proselytize away!
For the sake of clarity: I was just thinking.. I'll do nothing until I'm not sure what I'm doing. Thank you for sharing your experience, anyway I would be grateful if someone just answered to my question. My idea was to run an exit relay with a very very reduced exit policy (53,80,443), not with my ISP IP. if possible, I would run It from an IP provided by Keyweb for example, that allows to run exit relays and allows changing the Whois records, if you respond promptly to abuse reports. Sorry for my bad English. I don't exactly understand what you mean with "not guilty". The trials finished in your favor? Anyway, where I live, I can't use a VM provider as a full legal shield. If a very serious crime would be committed from my remote VM, I could be equally considered responsible. It would be interesting to know more details about your experience. What kind of exit policy did you used? Did your IP allowed you to directly manage the abuse reposts? What kind of attack was committed? Gigi On 28 July 2019 16:45:42 CEST, Happy Boy <jeep665@posteo.de> wrote:
I'm through with the trials after three years straight. It's an expensive fun, but I could buy new computers, because the old devices were robbed by the police. Good luck! I had a good lawyer. Result: "not guilty!"
Olaf
Am 27.07.19 um 19:53 schrieb John Ricketts:
+1 to this.
On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
dns1983@riseup.net:
Yes, I know.
Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible to use different IPs on my home connection, than those assigned from my ISP? Could you give me some tips? My general advise would be to _not_ run a tor exit relay at home.
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi! On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:08 PM Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org> wrote:
About the server, I have a powerful HPE ProLiant as mentioned earlier, but like other said at minimum you need a i5/i7 CPU, or an equivalent Xeon or AMD CPU. So this means no NUCs or HPE MicroServers.
Hm, why not NUCs? There are NUCs with 8th Generation Intel CPUs: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/129705/intel-nuc... For example, this one uses i7-8650U Processor: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/130392/intel-nuc-kit-nu... Based on what I read in all the replies (thank you all!) this should be more than enough? I was thinking of not really using a dedicated router, but hopefully configure NUC's WiFi into an AP. This is all I really need. I just hope I can configure it as a dual-band AP. I am not yet clear about that part. Mitar -- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m
By "NUC" I was meaning the low-end Celeron boxes. A NUC with a i7-8650U should work for Tor and a dedicated AP. It won't be as good as a desktop or server CPU, but for your use case it's fine as a relay and AP/router. However, the built-in Wi-Fi is usually only a single band at once. -Neel On 2019-07-27 01:38, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:08 PM Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org> wrote:
About the server, I have a powerful HPE ProLiant as mentioned earlier, but like other said at minimum you need a i5/i7 CPU, or an equivalent Xeon or AMD CPU. So this means no NUCs or HPE MicroServers.
Hm, why not NUCs? There are NUCs with 8th Generation Intel CPUs:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/129705/intel-nuc...
For example, this one uses i7-8650U Processor:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/130392/intel-nuc-kit-nu...
Based on what I read in all the replies (thank you all!) this should be more than enough?
I was thinking of not really using a dedicated router, but hopefully configure NUC's WiFi into an AP. This is all I really need. I just hope I can configure it as a dual-band AP. I am not yet clear about that part.
Mitar
Hi! I have deployed it: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/567E9785458C605E59202755C7489... On gigabit fiber, using this NUC: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/126140/intel-nuc-kit-nu... Now I just have to wait for traffic to build-up to see if it can really achieve gigabit. Is there any way to speed this process up? Is there anyone who would like to do some circuits through the node to exercise its bandwidth a bit? Mitar On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:31 PM Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
I have Sonic Fiber which offers gigabit symmetric connection. I am thinking of using it for gigabit Tor relay, but I wonder what would be good hardware to use for something like that. Information I have found [1] is from 2010 so I wonder if there are any updates? Is there any simple small box I could use? Like Intel NUC? Information here [2] says that one can get 400 Mbps with AES-NI. And so with two processes limit per my public IP this would be around 800 Mbps then. Is this still a reasonable expectation? Do I have to care about the network card to serve gigabit (besides its being nominally gigabit)? What would be memory requirements for such a device?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/or-talk@freehaven.net/msg14159.html [2] https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server
Mitar
Hi,
On 6 Aug 2019, at 20:12, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
I have deployed it:
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/567E9785458C605E59202755C7489...
On gigabit fiber, using this NUC:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/126140/intel-nuc-kit-nu...
Now I just have to wait for traffic to build-up to see if it can really achieve gigabit. Is there any way to speed this process up? Is there anyone who would like to do some circuits through the node to exercise its bandwidth a bit?
Rob might like to test your relay, because it should show a big speed increase if his tests are working. T
On Aug 6, 2019, at 8:17 PM, teor <teor@riseup.net> wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug 2019, at 20:12, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
I have deployed it:
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/567E9785458C605E59202755C7489...
On gigabit fiber, using this NUC:
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/126140/intel-nuc-kit-nu...
Now I just have to wait for traffic to build-up to see if it can really achieve gigabit. Is there any way to speed this process up? Is there anyone who would like to do some circuits through the node to exercise its bandwidth a bit?
Rob might like to test your relay, because it should show a big speed increase if his tests are working.
The result over the 20 second measurement is below. You should see Tor metrics get updated within about 24 hours. Peace, love, and positivity, Rob --- 432.7944107055664 mbit/s 895.6919174194336 mbit/s 874.1641845703125 mbit/s 887.5885925292969 mbit/s 893.9453659057617 mbit/s 889.0330429077148 mbit/s 890.8471984863281 mbit/s 894.3734512329102 mbit/s 895.8067245483398 mbit/s 900.4853210449219 mbit/s 900.6352462768555 mbit/s 890.7599563598633 mbit/s 895.5899658203125 mbit/s 897.7090148925781 mbit/s 890.3787384033203 mbit/s 897.9648971557617 mbit/s 897.6359939575195 mbit/s 886.5202789306641 mbit/s 876.5180358886719 mbit/s 893.7390213012695 mbit/s
participants (11)
-
dns1983＠riseup.net -
Happy Boy -
I -
John Ricketts -
Kenneth Freeman -
Mitar -
Neel Chauhan -
niftybunny -
nusenu -
Rob Jansen -
teor