On 06/26/2014 01:13 PM, s7r wrote:

On 6/26/2014 7:46 PM, Kali Tor wrote:

...

Hi,

...

Is my understanding correct that if I set AccountingMax, the relay will never be used as a DR?

...

It kind of feels odd because in my situation I can donate 500GB (and maybe even more) but I do want to keep a max limit and at the same time let the relay be a DR as well. Any way to achieve this?

...

-kali- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Hi Kali

Where did you learn that AccountingMax argument will prevent you from being a directory server?

I can not confirm or infirm this information, but as far as I see in the manual there is no such reference for accountingmax.

500GB per month is little amount of traffic, seriously. My 100mbit relays made on virtual servers consume 6-7TB of total traffic per month.

Use the accountingmax argument and you should be fine, it's better than capping bandwidth and it is a great help for the network.

Thanks for running a relay.

I had not read anything about this either, until I tried to enable it and got this in my log: 10:15:43 [NOTICE] Not advertising DirPort (Reason: AccountingMax enabled)

So, no way to offer DS while setting AccountingMax? -kali-

On Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:02 PM, Kali Tor <kalitor42@yahoo.com> wrote:

...

...

I had not read anything about this either, until I tried to enable it and got this in my log:

...

10:15:43 [NOTICE] Not advertising DirPort (Reason: AccountingMax enabled)

Exactly what I experienced at my side and hence my assumption that enabling AccountingMax disables DirPort and the DS capability.

-kali-