teor transcribed 0.7K bytes:

I'm sorry, I didn't get Isis' original email, I think my spam folder ate it.

Can you please re-send?

Of course! I actually didn't get a copy either; not sure what happened there. ----- Forwarded message from isis agora lovecruft <isis@patternsinthevoid.net> -----

From: isis agora lovecruft <isis@patternsinthevoid.net> Subject: Re: [tor-dev] [prop-meeting] [prop#267] "Tor Consensus Transparency" Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:31:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20180217063103.GF28876@patternsinthevoid.net> To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org Cc: tom@torproject.org, nickm@torproject.org, linus@torproject.org Reply-To: isis@patternsinthevoid.net

isis agora lovecruft transcribed 2.9K bytes:

...

Hello,

Let's schedule a proposal discussion for prop#267 "Tor Consensus Transparency" [0] sometime between 14 - 16 Feb. If you're CCed, it's because you put your name down on the pad as being interested in this discussion. If anyone has requests or concerns, or if I forgot to take your timezone into account, please let me know.

https://doodle.com/poll/a6ih5a4dqr9bdsie

Note that this meeting will likely run longer than an hour. I'll try to keep it as short as possible… but in the past this discussion has been long.

[0]: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/267-tor-consensus-t...

Oh no!

I'm so sorry; I totally messed up and forgot to choose the best time for people and announce it! I knew this was going to happen at some point; way more meetings to keep track of than I or probably any of us are used to.

I was thinking about this a bit before: we generally seem to have two disjoint sets of groups of people where no one "has to draw the short straw" i.e. attend a work meeting at a super unreasonable time:

1. americas + europe 2. australia + americas

I'm not sure how to do this, but perhaps there a way to vote such that we determine which set we're in, and then we simply have pre-determined meeting times each week for both groups, and we arrange the meetings for the interested groups at those set times? Would that work with most people's schedules? Or would it be too much of a burden to guarantee another weekly meeting? We could also duplicate/rehash meeting notes between meetings, if both sets are equivalently interested in a topic.

(Also, there is a potential third set of "australia + europe" which we've missed due to cognitive biases of having too many people in the americas.)

Please let me know your thoughts! I'm not totally sold on this idea, but I want to find a way to make discussions easier and better for everyone. Especially remembering that they are happening. *blush*

I propose the following meeting times, for each group, respectively:

1. Tuesdays @ 18:00 UTC (10:00 PST/13:00 EST/20:00 CET/05:00+1 AEDT) 2. Tuesdays @ 22:00 UTC (14:00 PST/17:00 EST/00:00+1 CET/12:00+1 AEDT)

Please feel free to request alternate times! Especially for people in Europe, these times aren't quite fair. (However, I'm also not seeing as much participation for european residents according to the pad and doodles.)

Best regards, -- ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://fyb.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt

----- End forwarded message ----- -- ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://fyb.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt