On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca wrote: [...]
FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography jounral:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
(The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.)
Congratulations, Ian! Any substantial changes since the CACR version?
Have you been getting any feedback from other vectors? Any interesting/useful comments from reviewers?
Is it your sense that folks outside of PCs and this list are reviewing your work here and giving it the kind of attention we'd want before deploying it? And if not, is there anything we can do to help this design get more attention?
yrs,