Re: [tor-dev] an alternate MyFamily definition

On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:03:06 +0000, tagnaq wrote: ...

Why? This would reduce the configuration effort required when adding a new relay to *two* relays regardless of how many relays are in your family.

True, but: If one relay disappears for a while then the family may break into two if it was the only joint. So from an operative point a bit more redundancy would be helpful.

...

A family member must have a *mutual* agreement with at least *one* node.

That's (the *mutual*) is an important point that wasn't immediately clear from the preceding. Otherwise I alone can put everything in a single family under this definition. :-)

Andreas