-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2015 04:36 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote:
On 5/19/15 4:43 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
Hello Tor-Dev,
One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised sometimes is that the current domain namespace spec doesn't have a method for a .bit domain owner to prove that they are in control of a .onion. (This is also an issue for .bit domains that point to .i2p.) I'm interested in improving this situation, and am looking for feedback.
At Tor2web we've been considering using Namecoin for those features:
https://github.com/globaleaks/Tor2web/issues/30 https://github.com/globaleaks/Tor2web/issues/66
If someone want to hack on those feature, we'd love to support! :)
Ah cool, thanks for the heads up; I wasn't aware that Tor2web was looking at that use case. Good to see that there's interest there. Cheers, - -Jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVXahkAAoJEAHN/EbZ1y06IDkP/10y0K27UZgFfUiKdxuCz0Lo jCYo5HwjD3usluF1nIpMnN29za1HtiqbRPkHmYnXVAx4L9hESB9oyw+2lS0XxDBu ZmncPhSJR/KTo8HJ3T7DbQsWqXzqUaaxuNCSYJKVRdZLejV6GDVJ57Fy2XlJTQ7p lQitFASjoH+2uhRa6a6DtHHXCph9LxCo6zvjA0CowEjDWaQYWuYyeL+uDz2bEr4X Q12t0PYoYFamz2i/3yzg39pyWJN16k7Qmi13DPkQiM2bB4/jNWej471DtZ0dE+KN dd9bM2srxfQVV/bd4LAB2OFo/zy3PPuAe/VenuZ4gSaW0QZfGEn4Vc09KvxnVFtD 19joxzOsAfvJ+Lk0ma+X7hy/m5G62RLLrcu7m2+4B27GXIVH8mTTx9ooyUDvYeBM sh0K8XtnTRivXmalg0BvPcVJnOIXD+p22N8mF5CXbBgjfKbKMFZYa6Cb+DNZmwPd eh/Llb/a4ktS4oo4hy8xZpE0cBGsuTWoomrZK3mFYBmPDggLvzUevUj3TAfIuyWZ exnVw9ELruIX85K9h/vXF2LxYAyTWyfd5x9mXVeB71KZnUi74NmKL38FcLtZNMTT OYztzK4FLl2FGcvYKGgdCBmwWB/yPFJBjzHk0HX9cI624IFD4Oh/Ok50oU18Szgg xG4BEtWm9OwtpEnzY3Nm =Ed/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----