commit 6f5a720d151e8d43d0e76221dee842bc159af710 Merge: b1f44fc bd6bd1c Author: Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org Date: Fri Jun 14 01:50:17 2013 -0400

Merge branch 'circuit_queue_cap-0.2.5-squashed'

Conflicts: src/or/relay.c

changes/bug9063 | 4 +++ src/or/or.h | 21 ++++++++++++ src/or/relay.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --cc src/or/relay.c index f0861f2,2fe6448..58ca4e9 --- a/src/or/relay.c +++ b/src/or/relay.c @@@ -2493,7 -2498,84 +2509,84 @@@ append_cell_to_circuit_queue(circuit_t streams_blocked = circ->streams_blocked_on_p_chan; }

+ /* Are we a middle circuit about to exceed ORCIRC_MAX_MIDDLE_CELLS? */ + if ((circ->n_chan != NULL) && CIRCUIT_IS_ORCIRC(circ)) { + orcirc = TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ); + if (orcirc->p_chan) { + /* We are a middle circuit if we have both n_chan and p_chan */ + /* We'll need to know the current preferred maximum */ + tgt_max_middle_cells = get_max_middle_cells(); + if (tgt_max_middle_cells > 0) { + /* Do we need to initialize middle_max_cells? */ + if (orcirc->max_middle_cells == 0) { + orcirc->max_middle_cells = tgt_max_middle_cells; + } else { + if (tgt_max_middle_cells > orcirc->max_middle_cells) { + /* If we want to increase the cap, we can do so right away */ + orcirc->max_middle_cells = tgt_max_middle_cells; + } else if (tgt_max_middle_cells < orcirc->max_middle_cells) { + /* + * If we're shrinking the cap, we can't shrink past either queue; + * compare tgt_max_middle_cells rather than tgt_max_middle_cells * + * ORCIRC_MAX_MIDDLE_KILL_THRESH so the queues don't shrink enough + * to generate spurious warnings, either. + */ + n_len = circ->n_chan_cells.n; + p_len = orcirc->p_chan_cells.n; + tmp = tgt_max_middle_cells; + if (tmp < n_len) tmp = n_len; + if (tmp < p_len) tmp = p_len; + orcirc->max_middle_cells = tmp; + } + /* else no change */ + } + } else { + /* tgt_max_middle_cells == 0 indicates we should disable the cap */ + orcirc->max_middle_cells = 0; + } + + /* Now we know orcirc->max_middle_cells is set correctly */ + if (orcirc->max_middle_cells > 0) { + hard_max_middle_cells = + (uint32_t)(((double)orcirc->max_middle_cells) * + ORCIRC_MAX_MIDDLE_KILL_THRESH); + + if ((unsigned)queue->n + 1 >= hard_max_middle_cells) { + /* Queueing this cell would put queue over the kill theshold */ + log_warn(LD_CIRC, + "Got a cell exceeding the hard cap of %u in the " + "%s direction on middle circ ID %u on chan ID " + U64_FORMAT "; killing the circuit.", + hard_max_middle_cells, + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? "n" : "p", + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? + circ->n_circ_id : orcirc->p_circ_id, + U64_PRINTF_ARG( + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? + circ->n_chan->global_identifier : + orcirc->p_chan->global_identifier)); + circuit_mark_for_close(circ, END_CIRC_REASON_RESOURCELIMIT); + return; + } else if ((unsigned)queue->n + 1 == orcirc->max_middle_cells) { + /* Only use ==, not >= for this test so we don't spam the log */ + log_warn(LD_CIRC, + "While trying to queue a cell, reached the soft cap of %u " + "in the %s direction on middle circ ID %u " + "on chan ID " U64_FORMAT ".", + orcirc->max_middle_cells, + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? "n" : "p", + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? + circ->n_circ_id : orcirc->p_circ_id, + U64_PRINTF_ARG( + (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_OUT) ? + circ->n_chan->global_identifier : + orcirc->p_chan->global_identifier)); + } + } + } + } + - cell_queue_append_packed_copy(queue, cell, chan->wide_circ_ids); + cell_queue_append_packed_copy(queue, cell, chan->wide_circ_ids, 1);

/* If we have too many cells on the circuit, we should stop reading from * the edge streams for a while. */