commit ed88a5d4d930928d687f82ee3d47d96e6ee11c30 Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> Date: Mon Aug 28 11:32:28 2017 -0400 prop281: Clarification based on comments from teor --- proposals/281-bulk-md-download.txt | 20 +++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/281-bulk-md-download.txt b/proposals/281-bulk-md-download.txt index 9b1d669..38c0a20 100644 --- a/proposals/281-bulk-md-download.txt +++ b/proposals/281-bulk-md-download.txt @@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ Status: Draft If answering, caches MUST reply with all of the microdescriptors that the cache holds that were listed by consensus X, and MUST omit all the microdescriptors that were - omitted listed in consensus Y. + not listed in consensus Y. (For the purposes of this proposal, + microdescriptors are "the same" if they are textually identical + and have the same digest.) 2.2. By consensus: @@ -52,10 +54,18 @@ Status: Draft 2.3. When to make these requests - Clients should decide to use this format in preference to the - old download-by-digest format if the consensus X lists their - preferred directory cache as using a new DirCache subprotocol - version. (See 5 below.) + Clients should decide to use this format in preference to the old + download-by-digest format if the consensus X lists their preferred + directory cache as using a new DirCache subprotocol version. (See + 5 below.) + + When a client has some preferred directory caches that support + this subprotocol and some that do not, it chooses one at random, + and uses these requests if that one supports this subprotocol. + + (A client always has a consensus when it requests + microdescriptors, so it will know whether any given cache supports + these requests.) 3. Performance analysis