commit db81cdbb0f9a69bc7bb0a4f77ff0fe44875f7cda Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> Date: Wed Mar 28 10:47:17 2012 -0400 Tweak the bug4438 fix a little: different check, better log Instead of checking for 'rejected' and calling everything else okay, let's check for 'outdated' and call everythign else a problem. This way we don't risk missing future errors so much. When logging a message that _looks_ like an error message at info, we should mention that it isn't really a problem. --- src/or/router.c | 9 +++++---- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/router.c b/src/or/router.c index 6199e9e..451d95d 100644 --- a/src/or/router.c +++ b/src/or/router.c @@ -654,17 +654,18 @@ init_keys(void) } added = dirserv_add_descriptor(ri, &m, "self"); if (!WRA_WAS_ADDED(added)) { - if (WRA_WAS_REJECTED(added)) { + if (!WRA_WAS_OUTDATED(added)) { log_err(LD_GENERAL, "Unable to add own descriptor to directory: %s", m?m:"<unknown error>"); return -1; } else { - /* If the descriptor wasn't rejected, that's ok. This can happen + /* If the descriptor was outdated, that's ok. This can happen * when some config options are toggled that affect workers, but * we don't really need new keys yet so the descriptor doesn't * change and the old one is still fresh. */ - log_info(LD_GENERAL, "Couldn't add own descriptor to directory: %s", - m?m:"unknown error>"); + log_info(LD_GENERAL, "Couldn't add own descriptor to directory " + "after key init: %s. This is usually not a problem.", + m?m:"<unknown error>"); } } }