commit d881250ff68a7bb77adef7a351790db7ee4c4332 Author: Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org Date: Thu Sep 22 10:27:13 2016 -0400

prop264: in consensuses, say "pr" rather than "proto" --- proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt b/proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt index 7f8c4d4..4acc8b3 100644 --- a/proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt +++ b/proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ Status: Open "x-" or "X-". Keywords are case-sensitive.

During voting, authorities copy these lines immediately below the "v" - lines. When a descriptor does not contain a "proto" entry, the + lines, using "pr" as the keyword instead of "proto". + When a descriptor does not contain a "proto" entry, the authorities should reconstruct it using the approach described below in section A.1. They are included in the consensus using the same rules as currently used for "v" lines, if a sufficiently late @@ -104,7 +105,7 @@ Status: Open inferrable from the v line. Removing all the v lines from the current consensus would save only 1.7% after gzip compression.]

-3. Using "proto" and "v" lines +3. Using "proto"/"pr" and "v" lines

Whenever possible, clients and relays should use the list of advertised protocols instead of version numbers. Version numbers