commit f508fabbb8869c70c9326a8f275ef762b9e337a4 Author: Donncha O'Cearbhaill <donncha@donncha.is> Date: Tue May 26 13:11:02 2015 +0100 Fix typos in proposal 224 --- proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt b/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt index ffef617..9ee628c 100644 --- a/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt +++ b/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ Status: Draft 2014-02-20: Move more things to the revised certificate format in the new updated proposal 220. + 2015-05-26: Fix two typos. + 0. Hidden services: overview and preliminaries. @@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ Status: Draft may decide to respond or not respond to the client's request depending on the contents of the request. The protocol is extensible at this point: at a minimum, the server requires that the client - demonstrate knowledge od the contents of the encrypted portion of the + demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the encrypted portion of the hidden service descriptor. The service may additionally require a user- or group-specific access token before it responds to requests. @@ -730,7 +732,7 @@ Status: Draft that, in order to make the system better tolerate disappearing HSDirs, hsdir_spread_fetch may be less than hsdir_spread_store.) - An HSDir should rejects a descriptor if that HSDir is not one of the + An HSDir should reject a descriptor if that HSDir is not one of the first hsdir_spread_accept HSDirs for that node. [TODO: Incorporate the findings from proposal 143 here. But watch