commit 08039970760f72b439398ae9eb42e786ccb6925e Author: Mike Perry mikeperry-git@torproject.org Date: Wed Jan 27 18:39:31 2016 -0800
At long last, a padding specification appears.
Baby steps. Crawl before you can walk. Walk before you can run. --- dir-spec.txt | 40 ++++++++ padding-spec.txt | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tor-spec.txt | 25 ++++- 3 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dir-spec.txt b/dir-spec.txt index 2ab1878..083299f 100644 --- a/dir-spec.txt +++ b/dir-spec.txt @@ -1116,6 +1116,46 @@ Pluggable transports are only relevant to bridges, but these entries can appear in non-bridge relays as well.
+ "padding-counts" YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS (NSEC s) key=val key=val ... NL + [At most once.] + + YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS defines the end of the included measurement + interval of length NSEC seconds (86400 seconds by default). Counts + are reset to 0 at the end of this interval. + + The keyword list is currently as follows: + + bin-size + - The current rounding value for cell count fields (10000 by + default) + write-drop + - The number of RELAY_DROP cells this relay sent + write-pad + - The number of CELL_PADDING cells this relay sent + write-total + - The total number of cells this relay cent + read-drop + - The number of RELAY_DROP cells this relay received + read-pad + - The number of CELL_PADDING cells this relay received + read-total + - The total number of cells this relay received + enabled-read-pad + - The number of CELL_PADDING cells this relay received on + connections that support padding + enabled-read-total + - The total number of cells this relay received on connections + that support padding + enabled-write-pad + - The total number of cells this relay received on connections + that support padding + enabled-write-total + - The total number of cells sent by this relay on connections + that support padding + max-chanpad-timers + - The maximum number of timers that this relay scheduled for + padding in the previous NSEC interval + "router-sig-ed25519" [As in router descriptors]
diff --git a/padding-spec.txt b/padding-spec.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f9b194 --- /dev/null +++ b/padding-spec.txt @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ + Tor Padding Specification + + Mike Perry + +Note: This is an attempt to specify Tor as currently implemented. Future +versions of Tor will implement improved algorithms. + +This document tries to cover how Tor chooses to use cover traffic to obscure +various traffic patterns from external and internal observers. Other +implementations MAY take other approaches, but implementors should be aware of +the anonymity and load-balancing implications of their choices. + + THIS SPEC ISN'T DONE YET. + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL + NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and + "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in + RFC 2119. + + +1. Overview + + Tor supports two classes of cover traffic: connection-level padding, and + circuit-level padding. + + Connection-level padding uses the CELL_PADDING cell command for cover + traffic, where as circuit-level padding uses the RELAY_COMMAND_DROP relay + command. CELL_PADDING is single-hop only and can be differentiated from + normal traffic by Tor relays ("internal" observers), but not by entities + monitoring Tor OR connections ("external" observers). + + RELAY_COMMAND_DROP is multi-hop, and is not visible to intermediate Tor + relays, because the relay command field is covered by circuit layer + encryption. Moreover, Tor's 'recognized' field allows RELAY_COMMAND_DROP + padding to be sent to any intermediate node in a circuit (as per Section + 6.1 of tor-spec.txt). + + Currently, only single-hop CELL_PADDING is used by Tor. It is described in + Section 2. At a later date, further sections will be added to this document + to describe various uses of multi-hop circuit-level padding. + + +2. Connection-level padding + +2.1. Background + + Tor clients and relays make use of CELL_PADDING to reduce the resolution of + connection-level metadata retention by ISPs and surveillance infrastructure. + + Such metadata retention is implemented by Internet routers in the form of + Netflow, jFlow, Netstream, or IPFIX records. These records are emitted by + gateway routers in a raw form and then exported (often over plaintext) to a + "collector" that either records them verbatim, or reduces their granularity + further[1]. + + Netflow records and the associated data collection and retention tools are + very configurable, and have many modes of operation, especially when + configured to handle high throughput. However, at ISP scale, per-flow records + are very likely to be employed, since they are the default, and also provide + very high resolution in terms of endpoint activity, second only to full packet + and/or header capture. + + Per-flow records record the endpoint connection 5-tuple, as well as the + total number of bytes sent and received by that 5-tuple during a particular + time period. They can store additional fields as well, but it is primarily + timing and bytecount information that concern us. + + When configured to provide per-flow data, routers emit these raw flow + records periodically for all active connections passing through them + based on two parameters: the "active flow timeout" and the "inactive + flow timeout". + + The "active flow timeout" causes the router to emit a new record + periodically for every active TCP session that continuously sends data. The + default active flow timeout for most routers is 30 minutes, meaning that a + new record is created for every TCP session at least every 30 minutes, no + matter what. This value can be configured from 1 minute to 60 minutes on + major routers. + + The "inactive flow timeout" is used by routers to create a new record if a + TCP session is inactive for some number of seconds. It allows routers to + avoid the need to track a large number of idle connections in memory, and + instead emit a separate record only when there is activity. This value + ranges from 10 seconds to 600 seconds on common routers. It appears as + though no routers support a value lower than 10 seconds. + + For reference, here are default values and ranges (in parenthesis when + known) for common routers, along with citations to their manuals. + + Some routers speak other collection protocols than Netflow, and in the + case of Juniper, use different timeouts for these protocols. Where this + is known to happen, it has been noted. + + Inactive Timeout Active Timeout + Cisco IOS[3] 15s (10-600s) 30min (1-60min) + Cisco Catalyst[4] 5min 32min + Juniper (jFlow)[5] 15s (10-600s) 30min (1-60min) + Juniper (Netflow)[6,7] 60s (10-600s) 30min (1-30min) + H3C (Netstream)[8] 60s (60-600s) 30min (1-60min) + Fortinet[9] 15s 30min + MicroTik[10] 15s 30min + nProbe[14] 30s 120s + Alcatel-Lucent[2] 15s (10-600s) 30min (1-600min) + + The combination of the active and inactive netflow record timeouts allow us + to devise a low-cost padding defense that causes what would otherwise be + split records to "collapse" at the router even before they are exported to + the collector for storage. So long as a connection transmits data before the + "inactive flow timeout" expires, then the router will continue to count the + total bytes on that flow before finally emitting a record at the "active + flow timeout". + + This means that for a minimal amount of padding that prevents the "inactive + flow timeout" from expiring, it is possible to reduce the resolution of raw + per-flow netflow data to the total amount of bytes send and received in a 30 + minute window. This is a vast reduction in resolution for HTTP, IRC, XMPP, + SSH, and other intermittent interactive traffic, especially when all + user traffic in that time period is multiplexed over a single connection + (as it is with Tor). + +2.2. Implementation + + Tor clients currently maintain one TLS connection to their Guard node to + carry actual application traffic, and make up to 3 additional connections to + other nodes to retrieve directory information. + + We pad only the client's connection to the Guard node, and not any other + connection. We treat Bridge node connections to the Tor network as client + connections, and pad them, but otherwise not pad between normal relays. + + Both clients and Guards will maintain a timer for all application (ie: + non-directory) TLS connections. Every time a non-padding packet is sent or + received by either end, that endpoint will sample a timeout value from + between 1.5 seconds and 9.5 seconds using the max(X,X) distribution + described in Section 2.3. The time range is subject to consensus + parameters as specified in Section 2.6. + + If the connection becomes active for any reason before this timer + expires, the timer is reset to a new random value between 1.5 and 9.5 + seconds. If the connection remains inactive until the timer expires, a + single CELL_PADDING cell will be sent on that connection. + + In this way, the connection will only be padded in the event that it is + idle, and will always transmit a packet before the minimum 10 second inactive + timeout. + +2.3. Padding Cell Timeout Distribution Statistics + + It turns out that because the padding is bidirectional, and because both + endpoints are maintaining timers, this creates the situation where the time + before sending a padding packet in either direction is actually + min(client_timeout, server_timeout). + + If client_timeout and server_timeout are uniformly sampled, then the + distribution of min(client_timeout,server_timeout) is no longer uniform, and + the resulting average timeout (Exp[min(X,X)]) is much lower than the + midpoint of the timeout range. + + To compensate for this, instead of sampling each endpoint timeout uniformly, + we instead sample it from max(X,X), where X is uniformly distributed. + + If X is a random variable uniform from 0..R-1 (where R=high-low), then the + random variable Y = max(X,X) has Prob(Y == i) = (2.0*i + 1)/(R*R). + + Then, when both sides apply timeouts sampled from Y, the resulting + bidirectional padding packet rate is now a third random variable: + Z = min(Y,Y). + + The distribution of Z is slightly bell-shaped, but mostly flat around the + mean. It also turns out that Exp[Z] ~= Exp[X]. Here's a table of average + values for each random variable: + + R Exp[X] Exp[Z] Exp[min(X,X)] Exp[Y=max(X,X)] + 2000 999.5 1066 666.2 1332.8 + 3000 1499.5 1599.5 999.5 1999.5 + 5000 2499.5 2666 1666.2 3332.8 + 6000 2999.5 3199.5 1999.5 3999.5 + 7000 3499.5 3732.8 2332.8 4666.2 + 8000 3999.5 4266.2 2666.2 5332.8 + 10000 4999.5 5328 3332.8 6666.2 + 15000 7499.5 7995 4999.5 9999.5 + 20000 9900.5 10661 6666.2 13332.8 + + In this way, we maintain the property that the midpoint of the timeout range + is the expected mean time before a padding packet is sent in either + direction. + +2.4. Maximum overhead bounds + + With the default parameters and the above distribution, we expect a + padded connection to send one padding cell every 5.5 seconds. This + averages to 103 bytes per second full duplex (~52 bytes/sec in each + direction), assuming a 512 byte cell and 55 bytes of TLS+TCP+IP headers. + For a client connection that remains otherwise idle for its expected + ~50 minute lifespan (governed by the circuit available timeout plus a + small additional connection timeout), this is about 154.5KB of overhead + in each direction (309KB total). + + With 2.5M completely idle clients connected simultaneously, 52 bytes per + second amounts to 130MB/second in each direction network-wide, which is + roughly the current amount of Tor directory traffic[11]. Of course, our + 2.5M daily users will neither be connected simultaneously, nor entirely + idle, so we expect the actual overhead to be much lower than this. + +2.5. Reducing or Disabling Padding via Negotiation + + To allow mobile clients to either disable or reduce their padding overhead, + the CELL_PADDING_NEGOTIATE cell (tor-spec.txt section 7.2) may be sent from + clients to relays. This cell is used to instruct relays to cease sending + padding. + + If the client has opted to use reduced padding, it continues to send + padding cells sampled from the range [9000,14000] milliseconds (subject to + consensus parameter alteration as per Section 2.6), still using the + Y=max(X,X) distribution. Since the padding is now unidirectional, the + expected frequency of padding cells is now governed by the Y distribution + above as opposed to Z. For a range of 5000ms, we can see that we expect to + send a padding packet every 9000+3332.8 = 12332.8ms. We also half the + circuit available timeout from ~50min down to ~25min, which causes the + client's OR connections to be closed shortly there after when it is idle, + thus reducing overhead. + + These two changes cause the padding overhead to go from 309KB per one-time-use + Tor connection down to 69KB per one-time-use Tor connection. For continual + usage, the maximum overhead goes from 103 bytes/sec down to 46 bytes/sec. + + If a client opts to completely disable padding, it sends a + CELL_PADDING_NEGOTIATE to instruct the relay not to pad, and then does not + send any further padding itself. + +2.6. Consensus Parameters Governing Behavior + + Connection-level padding is controlled by the following consensus parameters: + + * nf_ito_low + - The low end of the range to send padding when inactive, in ms. + - Default: 1500 + + * nf_ito_high + - The high end of the range to send padding, in ms. + - Default: 9500 + - If nf_ito_low == nf_ito_high == 0, padding will be disabled. + + * nf_ito_low_reduced + - For reduced padding clients: the low end of the range to send padding + when inactive, in ms. + - Default: 9000 + + * nf_ito_high_reduced + - For reduced padding clients: the high end of the range to send padding, + in ms. + - Default: 14000 + + * nf_conntimeout_clients + - The number of seconds to keep circuits opened and available for + clients to use. Note that the actual client timeout is randomized + uniformly from this value to twice this value. This governs client + OR conn lifespan. Reduced padding clients use half the consensus + value. + - Default: 1800 + + * nf_pad_before_usage + - If set to 1, OR connections are padded before the client uses them + for any application traffic. If 0, OR connections are not padded + until application data begins. + - Default: 1 + + * nf_pad_relays + - If set to 1, we also pad inactive relay-to-relay connections + - Default: 0 + + * nf_conntimeout_relays + - The number of seconds that idle relay-to-relay connections are kept + open. + - Default: 3600 + + +1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetFlow +2. http://infodoc.alcatel-lucent.com/html/0_add-h-f/93-0073-10-01/7750_SR_OS_Ro... +3. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/netflow/command/reference/nfl_a1gt... +4. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-swit... +5. https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose60/swconfig-routing-vol1... +6. http://www.jnpr.net/techpubs/en_US/junos15.1/topics/reference/configuration-... +7. http://www.jnpr.net/techpubs/en_US/junos15.1/topics/reference/configuration-... +8. http://www.h3c.com/portal/Technical_Support___Documents/Technical_Documents/... +9. http://docs-legacy.fortinet.com/fgt/handbook/cli52_html/FortiOS%205.2%20CLI/... +10. http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Traffic_Flow +11. https://metrics.torproject.org/dirbytes.html +12. http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/murdoch-pet2007.pdf +13. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/188-bridge-guards.t... +14. http://www.ntop.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/nProbe_UserGuide.pdf diff --git a/tor-spec.txt b/tor-spec.txt index e85634d..53158fe 100644 --- a/tor-spec.txt +++ b/tor-spec.txt @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ see tor-design.pdf. 9 -- RELAY_EARLY (End-to-end data; limited)(See Sec 5.6) 10 -- CREATE2 (Extended CREATE cell) (See Sec 5.1) 11 -- CREATED2 (Extended CREATED cell) (See Sec 5.1) + 12 -- PADDING_NEGOTIATE (Padding negotiation) (See Sec 7.2)
Variable-length command values are: 7 -- VERSIONS (Negotiate proto version) (See Sec 4) @@ -539,6 +540,7 @@ see tor-design.pdf. variable-length cells. 3 -- Uses the in-protocol handshake. 4 -- Increases circuit ID width to 4 bytes. + 5 -- Adds support for link padding and negotiation (padding-spec.txt).
4.2. CERTS cells @@ -1534,11 +1536,24 @@ see tor-design.pdf. long-range padding. The contents of a PADDING, VPADDING, or DROP cell SHOULD be chosen randomly, and MUST be ignored.
- Currently nodes are not required to do any sort of link padding or - dummy traffic. Because strong attacks exist even with link padding, - and because link padding greatly increases the bandwidth requirements - for running a node, we plan to leave out link padding until this - tradeoff is better understood. + If the link protocol is version 5 or higher, link level padding is + enabled as per padding-spec.txt. On these connections, clients may + negotiate the use of padding with a CELL_PADDING_NEGOTIATE command + whose format is as follows: + Version [1 byte] + Command [1 byte] + ito_low_ms [2 bytes] + ito_high_ms [2 bytes] + + Currently, only version 0 of this cell is defined. In it, the command + field is either 1 (stop padding) or 2 (start padding). For the start + padding command, a pair of timeout values specifying a low and a high + range bounds for randomized padding timeouts may be specified as unsigned + integer values in milliseconds. The ito_low_ms field must not be lower than + the current consensus parameter value for nf_ito_low (default: 1500). + ito_high_ms must be greater than ito_low_ms. + + For more details on padding behavior, see padding-spec.txt.
7.3. Circuit-level flow control