commit 9504fabb02788bde6bd698fb2a148f25330dc021 Author: Fernando Fernandez Mancera ffmancera@riseup.net Date: Thu Apr 5 16:19:40 2018 +0200
Enable DISABLE_DISABLING_ED25519.
We are going to stop recommending 0.2.5 so there is no reason to keep the undef statement anymore.
Fixes #20522.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera ffmancera@riseup.net --- src/or/dirserv.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/or/dirserv.c b/src/or/dirserv.c index 68727f071..b3aaa25bf 100644 --- a/src/or/dirserv.c +++ b/src/or/dirserv.c @@ -259,11 +259,12 @@ dirserv_load_fingerprint_file(void) * identity to stop doing so. This is going to be essential for good identity * security: otherwise anybody who can attack RSA-1024 but not Ed25519 could * just sign fake descriptors missing the Ed25519 key. But we won't actually - * be able to prevent that kind of thing until we're confident that there - * isn't actually a legit reason to downgrade to 0.2.5. So for now, we have - * to leave this #undef. + * be able to prevent that kind of thing until we're confident that there isn't + * actually a legit reason to downgrade to 0.2.5. Now we are not recommending + * 0.2.5 anymore so there is no reason to keep the #undef. */ -#undef DISABLE_DISABLING_ED25519 + +#define DISABLE_DISABLING_ED25519
/** Check whether <b>router</b> has a nickname/identity key combination that * we recognize from the fingerprint list, or an IP we automatically act on