commit 874eca6a8c318c6a8a913520299e36a2757aa490 Author: Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org Date: Thu Sep 13 16:30:11 2018 -0400
Add a test case with a matching ip but mismatched identity. --- src/test/test_bridges.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/test/test_bridges.c b/src/test/test_bridges.c index 6fcb6fbbb..1cad5445f 100644 --- a/src/test/test_bridges.c +++ b/src/test/test_bridges.c @@ -623,13 +623,25 @@ test_bridges_node_is_a_configured_bridge(void *arg) base16_decode(node_with_digest.identity, DIGEST_LEN, fingerprint, HEX_DIGEST_LEN);
- tt_assert(node_is_a_configured_bridge(&node_with_digest)); - node_t node_ri_ipv4 = { .ri = &ri_ipv4 }; base16_decode(node_ri_ipv4.identity, DIGEST_LEN, fingerprint2, HEX_DIGEST_LEN); tt_assert(node_is_a_configured_bridge(&node_ri_ipv4));
+ /* This will still match bridge0, since bridge0 has no digest set. */ + memset(node_ri_ipv4.identity, 0x3f, DIGEST_LEN); + tt_assert(node_is_a_configured_bridge(&node_ri_ipv4)); + + /* It won't match bridge1, though, since bridge1 has a digest, and this + isn't it! */ + node_ri_ipv4.ri->addr = 0x06060607; + node_ri_ipv4.ri->or_port = 6667; + tt_assert(! node_is_a_configured_bridge(&node_ri_ipv4)); + /* If we set the fingerprint right, though, it will match. */ + base16_decode(node_ri_ipv4.identity, DIGEST_LEN, + "A10C4F666D27364036B562823E5830BC448E046A", HEX_DIGEST_LEN); + tt_assert(node_is_a_configured_bridge(&node_ri_ipv4)); + node_t node_rs_ipv4 = { .rs = &rs_ipv4 }; base16_decode(node_rs_ipv4.identity, DIGEST_LEN, fingerprint2, HEX_DIGEST_LEN);