commit fa3c23773944788125db2f67bcb048376c17fec9 Author: Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org Date: Wed Mar 20 16:17:06 2013 -0400
Per-SOCKSPort configuration for bug 8117 fix.
This might be necessary if the bug8117 fix confuses any applications.
Also add a changes file. --- changes/bug8117 | 13 +++++++++++++ doc/tor.1.txt | 14 +++++++++++++- src/or/buffers.c | 7 +++++-- src/or/config.c | 9 +++++++++ src/or/connection.c | 6 ++++++ src/or/or.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/changes/bug8117 b/changes/bug8117 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..910e805 --- /dev/null +++ b/changes/bug8117 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + o Major bugfixes: + + - Many SOCKS5 clients, when configured to offer a username/password, + offer both username/password authentication and "no authentication". + Tor had previously preferred no authentication, but this was + problematic when trying to make applications get proper stream + isolation with IsolateSOCKSAuth. Now, on any SOCKS port with + IsolateSOCKSAuth turned on (which is the default), Tor selects + username/password authentication if it's offered. If this confuses your + application, you can disable it on a per-SOCKSPort basis via + PreferSOCKSNoAuth. Fixes bug 8117; bugfix on 0.2.3.3-alpha. + + diff --git a/doc/tor.1.txt b/doc/tor.1.txt index 773fccf..85f0835 100644 --- a/doc/tor.1.txt +++ b/doc/tor.1.txt @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ The following options are useful only for clients (that is, if the same circuit. Currently, two addresses are "too close" if they lie in the same /16 range. (Default: 1)
-**SOCKSPort** ['address':]__port__|**auto** [_isolation flags_]:: +**SOCKSPort** ['address':]__port__|**auto** [_flags_] [_isolation flags_]:: Open this port to listen for connections from SOCKS-speaking applications. Set this to 0 if you don't want to allow application connections via SOCKS. Set it to "auto" to have Tor pick a port for @@ -894,6 +894,18 @@ The following options are useful only for clients (that is, if port with the same session group. (By default, streams received on different SOCKSPorts, TransPorts, etc are always isolated from one another. This option overrides that behavior.) ++ + Other recognized _flags_ for a SOCKSPort are: + **PreferSOCKSNoAuth**;; + Ordinarily, when an application offers both "username/password + authentication" and "no authentication" to Tor via SOCKS5, Tor + selects username/password authentication so that IsolateSOCKSAuth can + work. This can confuse some applications, if they offer a + username/password combination then get confused when asked for + one. You can disable this behavior, so that Tor will select "No + authentication" when IsolateSOCKSAuth is disabled, or when this + option is set. +
**SOCKSListenAddress** __IP__[:__PORT__]:: Bind to this address to listen for connections from Socks-speaking diff --git a/src/or/buffers.c b/src/or/buffers.c index 4554a02..c0868f4 100644 --- a/src/or/buffers.c +++ b/src/or/buffers.c @@ -1773,6 +1773,7 @@ parse_socks(const char *data, size_t datalen, socks_request_t *req,
if (req->socks_version != 5) { /* we need to negotiate a method */ unsigned char nummethods = (unsigned char)*(data+1); + int have_user_pass, have_no_auth; int r=0; tor_assert(!req->socks_version); if (datalen < 2u+nummethods) { @@ -1783,14 +1784,16 @@ parse_socks(const char *data, size_t datalen, socks_request_t *req, return -1; req->replylen = 2; /* 2 bytes of response */ req->reply[0] = 5; /* socks5 reply */ - if (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_USER_PASS, nummethods)) { + have_user_pass = (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_USER_PASS, nummethods) !=NULL); + have_no_auth = (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_NO_AUTH, nummethods) !=NULL); + if (have_user_pass && !(have_no_auth && req->socks_prefer_no_auth)) { req->auth_type = SOCKS_USER_PASS; req->reply[1] = SOCKS_USER_PASS; /* tell client to use "user/pass" auth method */ req->socks_version = 5; /* remember we've already negotiated auth */ log_debug(LD_APP,"socks5: accepted method 2 (username/password)"); r=0; - } else if (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_NO_AUTH, nummethods)) { + } else if (have_no_auth) { req->reply[1] = SOCKS_NO_AUTH; /* tell client to use "none" auth method */ req->socks_version = 5; /* remember we've already negotiated auth */ diff --git a/src/or/config.c b/src/or/config.c index 90a5dfb..a80576e 100644 --- a/src/or/config.c +++ b/src/or/config.c @@ -5787,6 +5787,7 @@ parse_port_config(smartlist_t *out, int port; int sessiongroup = SESSION_GROUP_UNSET; unsigned isolation = ISO_DEFAULT; + int prefer_no_auth = 0;
char *addrport; uint16_t ptmp=0; @@ -5916,6 +5917,11 @@ parse_port_config(smartlist_t *out, no = 1; elt += 2; } + if (!strcasecmp(elt, "PreferSOCKSNoAuth")) { + prefer_no_auth = ! no; + continue; + } + if (!strcasecmpend(elt, "s")) elt[strlen(elt)-1] = '\0'; /* kill plurals. */
@@ -5959,6 +5965,9 @@ parse_port_config(smartlist_t *out, cfg->all_addrs = all_addrs; cfg->ipv4_only = ipv4_only; cfg->ipv6_only = ipv6_only; + cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth = prefer_no_auth; + if (! (isolation & ISO_SOCKSAUTH)) + cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth = 1;
smartlist_add(out, cfg); } diff --git a/src/or/connection.c b/src/or/connection.c index eac9c4f..aeb4949 100644 --- a/src/or/connection.c +++ b/src/or/connection.c @@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ connection_listener_new(const struct sockaddr *listensockaddr, lis_conn->session_group = global_next_session_group--; } } + lis_conn->socks_prefer_no_auth = port_cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth;
if (connection_add(conn) < 0) { /* no space, forget it */ log_warn(LD_NET,"connection_add for listener failed. Giving up."); @@ -1238,6 +1239,11 @@ connection_handle_listener_read(connection_t *conn, int new_type) newconn->port = port; newconn->address = tor_dup_addr(&addr);
+ if (new_type == CONN_TYPE_AP) { + TO_ENTRY_CONN(newconn)->socks_request->socks_prefer_no_auth = + TO_LISTENER_CONN(conn)->socks_prefer_no_auth; + } + } else if (conn->socket_family == AF_UNIX) { /* For now only control ports can be Unix domain sockets * and listeners at the same time */ diff --git a/src/or/or.h b/src/or/or.h index 51c23d3..ca28c0e 100644 --- a/src/or/or.h +++ b/src/or/or.h @@ -1085,6 +1085,10 @@ typedef struct listener_connection_t { /** One or more ISO_ flags to describe how to isolate streams. */ uint8_t isolation_flags; /**@}*/ + /** For SOCKS connections only: If this is set, we will choose "no + * authentication" instead of "username/password" authentication if both + * are offered. Used as input to parse_socks. */ + unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
} listener_connection_t;
@@ -2910,6 +2914,10 @@ typedef struct port_cfg_t { uint8_t isolation_flags; /**< Zero or more isolation flags */ int session_group; /**< A session group, or -1 if this port is not in a * session group. */ + /* Socks only: */ + /** When both no-auth and user/pass are advertised by a SOCKS client, select + * no-auth. */ + unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
/* Server port types (or, dir) only: */ unsigned int no_advertise : 1; @@ -3729,6 +3737,10 @@ struct socks_request_t { * make sure we send back a socks reply for * every connection. */ unsigned int got_auth : 1; /**< Have we received any authentication data? */ + /** If this is set, we will choose "no authentication" instead of + * "username/password" authentication if both are offered. Used as input to + * parse_socks. */ + unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
/** Number of bytes in username; 0 if username is NULL */ size_t usernamelen;