commit 7cec9e0b1269dca5501dbac96d90c98c54b41c41 Author: Damian Johnson atagar@torproject.org Date: Sun Oct 6 13:58:37 2013 -0700
Using string's format() method for notifications
Swapping from from the '%' formatting operator to string's format() method to improve our config and script's readability. --- consensus_health_checker.py | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- data/consensus_health.cfg | 32 +++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/consensus_health_checker.py b/consensus_health_checker.py index 12bb451..bf25a7a 100755 --- a/consensus_health_checker.py +++ b/consensus_health_checker.py @@ -53,19 +53,19 @@ class Issue(object): self.msg = msg
@staticmethod - def for_msg(runlevel, template, *attr): + def for_msg(runlevel, template, **attr): """ Provides an Issue for the given message from our config with any formatted string arguments inserted.
:var str runlevel: runlevel of the issue :param str template: base string to fetch from our config - :param list attr: formatted string arguments + :param dict attr: formatted string arguments """
if template in CONFIG['msg']: try: - return Issue(runlevel, CONFIG['msg'][template] % attr) + return Issue(runlevel, CONFIG['msg'][template].format(**attr)) except: log.error("Unable to apply formatted string attributes to msg.%s: %s" % (template, attr)) else: @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ def missing_latest_consensus(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes):
if stale_authorities: runlevel = Runlevel.ERROR if len(stale_authorities) > 3 else Runlevel.WARNING - return Issue.for_msg(runlevel, 'MISSING_LATEST_CONSENSUS', ', '.join(stale_authorities)) + return Issue.for_msg(runlevel, 'MISSING_LATEST_CONSENSUS', authorities = ', '.join(stale_authorities))
def consensus_method_unsupported(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ def consensus_method_unsupported(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): incompatible_authorities.append(authority)
if incompatible_authorities: - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'CONSENSUS_METHOD_UNSUPPORTED', ', '.join(incompatible_authorities)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'CONSENSUS_METHOD_UNSUPPORTED', authorities = ', '.join(incompatible_authorities))
def different_recommended_client_version(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ def different_recommended_client_version(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes):
if differences: if rate_limit_notice('different_recommended_versions.client', days = 1): - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION', 'client', ', '.join(differences)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION', type = 'client', differences = ', '.join(differences))
def different_recommended_server_version(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ def different_recommended_server_version(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes):
if differences: if rate_limit_notice('different_recommended_versions.server', days = 1): - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION', 'server', ', '.join(differences)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION', type = 'server', differences = ', '.join(differences))
def _version_difference_str(authority, consensus_versions, vote_versions): @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ def unknown_consensus_parameters(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): unknown_entries.append('%s %s' % (authority, ' '.join(unknown_params)))
if unknown_entries: - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'UNKNOWN_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS', ', '.join(unknown_entries)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'UNKNOWN_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS', parameters = ', '.join(unknown_entries))
def vote_parameters_mismatch_consensus(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ def vote_parameters_mismatch_consensus(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): mismatching_entries.append('%s %s' % (authority, ' '.join(mismatching_params)))
if mismatching_entries: - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISMATCH_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS', ', '.join(mismatching_entries)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISMATCH_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS', parameters = ', '.join(mismatching_entries))
def certificate_expiration(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -323,13 +323,13 @@ def certificate_expiration(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes):
if (cert_expiration - current_time) <= datetime.timedelta(days = 14): if rate_limit_notice('cert_expiration.two_weeks.%s' % authority, days = 14): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', 'two weeks', expiration_label)) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', duration = 'two weeks', authority = expiration_label)) elif (cert_expiration - current_time) <= datetime.timedelta(days = 60): if rate_limit_notice('cert_expiration.two_months.%s' % authority, days = 60): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', 'two months', expiration_label)) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', duration = 'two months', authority = expiration_label)) elif (cert_expiration - current_time) <= datetime.timedelta(days = 90): if rate_limit_notice('cert_expiration.three_months.%s' % authority, days = 90): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', 'three months', expiration_label)) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE', duration = 'three months', authority = expiration_label))
return issues
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ def consensuses_have_same_votes(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): authorities_missing_votes.append(authority)
if authorities_missing_votes: - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISSING_VOTES', ', '.join(authorities_missing_votes)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISSING_VOTES', authorities = ', '.join(authorities_missing_votes))
def has_all_signatures(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ def has_all_signatures(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): missing_authorities.add(missing_authority)
if missing_authorities: - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISSING_SIGNATURE', ', '.join(missing_authorities)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'MISSING_SIGNATURE', authorities = ', '.join(missing_authorities))
def voting_bandwidth_scanners(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -404,11 +404,11 @@ def voting_bandwidth_scanners(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): if missing_authorities: if rate_limit_notice('missing_bw_scanners.%s' % '.'.join(missing_authorities), days = 1): runlevel = Runlevel.ERROR if len(missing_authorities) > 1 else Runlevel.WARNING - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(runlevel, 'MISSING_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS', ', '.join(missing_authorities))) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(runlevel, 'MISSING_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS', authorities = ', '.join(missing_authorities)))
if extra_authorities: if rate_limit_notice('extra_bw_scanners.%s' % '.'.join(extra_authorities), days = 1): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'EXTRA_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS', ', '.join(extra_authorities))) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'EXTRA_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS', authorities = ', '.join(extra_authorities)))
return issues
@@ -430,11 +430,11 @@ def has_authority_flag(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes):
if missing_authorities: if rate_limit_notice('missing_authorities.%s' % '.'.join(missing_authorities), days = 7): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'MISSING_AUTHORITIES', ', '.join(missing_authorities))) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'MISSING_AUTHORITIES', authorities = ', '.join(missing_authorities)))
if extra_authorities: if rate_limit_notice('extra_authorities.%s' % '.'.join(extra_authorities), days = 7): - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'EXTRA_AUTHORITIES', ', '.join(extra_authorities))) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'EXTRA_AUTHORITIES', authorities = ', '.join(extra_authorities)))
return issues
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ def has_expected_fingerprints(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): expected_fingerprint = DIRECTORY_AUTHORITIES[desc.nickname].fingerprint
if desc.fingerprint != expected_fingerprint: - issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.ERROR, 'FINGERPRINT_MISMATCH', desc.nickname, desc.fingerprint, expected_fingerprint)) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.ERROR, 'FINGERPRINT_MISMATCH', authority = desc.nickname, expected = desc.fingerprint, actual = expected_fingerprint))
return issues
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ def is_recommended_versions(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): if outdated_authorities: if rate_limit_notice('tor_out_of_date.%s' % '.'.join(outdated_authorities.keys()), days = 7): entries = ['%s (%s)' % (k, v) for k, v in outdated_authorities.items()] - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'TOR_OUT_OF_DATE', ', '.join(entries)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.WARNING, 'TOR_OUT_OF_DATE', authorities = ', '.join(entries))
def bad_exits_in_sync(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ def bad_exits_in_sync(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): with_flag = set([authority for authority, flagged in bad_exits.items() if fingerprint in flagged]) without_flag = voting_authorities.difference(with_flag)
- issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'BADEXIT_OUT_OF_SYNC', fingerprint, ', '.join(with_flag), ', '.join(without_flag))) + issues.append(Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'BADEXIT_OUT_OF_SYNC', fingerprint = fingerprint, with_flag = ', '.join(with_flag), without_flag = ', '.join(without_flag)))
if issues and rate_limit_notice('bad_exits_in_sync', days = 1): return issues @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ def bandwidth_authorities_in_sync(latest_consensus, consensuses, votes): if count > (1.2 * average) or count < (0.8 * average): if rate_limit_notice('bandwidth_authorities_in_sync', days = 1): entries = ['%s (%s)' % (authority, count) for authority, count in measurement_counts.items()] - return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'BANDWIDTH_AUTHORITIES_OUT_OF_SYNC', ', '.join(entries)) + return Issue.for_msg(Runlevel.NOTICE, 'BANDWIDTH_AUTHORITIES_OUT_OF_SYNC', authorities = ', '.join(entries))
break
diff --git a/data/consensus_health.cfg b/data/consensus_health.cfg index 1fd4505..d11e4df 100644 --- a/data/consensus_health.cfg +++ b/data/consensus_health.cfg @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ # message templates for notifications we send
-msg MISSING_LATEST_CONSENSUS => The consensuses published by the following directory authorities are more than one hour old and therefore not fresh anymore: %s -msg CONSENSUS_METHOD_UNSUPPORTED => The following directory authorities do not support the consensus method that the consensus uses: %s -msg DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION => The following directory authorities recommend other %s versions than the consensus: %s -msg UNKNOWN_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS => The following directory authorities set unknown consensus parameters: %s -msg MISMATCH_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS => The following directory authorities set conflicting consensus parameters: %s -msg CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE => The certificate of the following directory authority expires within the next %s: %s -msg MISSING_SIGNATURE => The signatures of the following, previously voting authorities are missing from at least one consensus: %s -msg MISSING_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS => The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: %s -msg EXTRA_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS => The following directory authorities were not expected to report bandwidth scanner results: %s -msg MISSING_VOTES => The consensuses downloaded from the following authorities are missing votes that are contained in consensuses downloaded from other authorities: %s -msg MISSING_AUTHORITIES => The following authorities are missing from the consensus: %s -msg EXTRA_AUTHORITIES => The following authorities were not expected in the consensus: %s -msg FINGERPRINT_MISMATCH => %s had a different fingerprint than we expected (expected: %s, actual: %s) -msg TOR_OUT_OF_DATE => The following authorities are an out of date version of tor: %s -msg BADEXIT_OUT_OF_SYNC => Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for %s (with flag: %s, without flag: %s) -msg BANDWIDTH_AUTHORITIES_OUT_OF_SYNC => Bandwidth authorities have a substantially different number of measured entries: %s +msg MISSING_LATEST_CONSENSUS => The consensuses published by the following directory authorities are more than one hour old and therefore not fresh anymore: {authorities} +msg CONSENSUS_METHOD_UNSUPPORTED => The following directory authorities do not support the consensus method that the consensus uses: {authorities} +msg DIFFERENT_RECOMMENDED_VERSION => The following directory authorities recommend other {type} versions than the consensus: {differences} +msg UNKNOWN_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS => The following directory authorities set unknown consensus parameters: {parameters} +msg MISMATCH_CONSENSUS_PARAMETERS => The following directory authorities set conflicting consensus parameters: {parameters} +msg CERTIFICATE_ABOUT_TO_EXPIRE => The certificate of the following directory authority expires within the next {duration}: {authority} +msg MISSING_SIGNATURE => The signatures of the following, previously voting authorities are missing from at least one consensus: {authorities} +msg MISSING_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS => The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: {authorities} +msg EXTRA_BANDWIDTH_SCANNERS => The following directory authorities were not expected to report bandwidth scanner results: {authorities} +msg MISSING_VOTES => The consensuses downloaded from the following authorities are missing votes that are contained in consensuses downloaded from other authorities: {authorities} +msg MISSING_AUTHORITIES => The following authorities are missing from the consensus: {authorities} +msg EXTRA_AUTHORITIES => The following authorities were not expected in the consensus: {authorities} +msg FINGERPRINT_MISMATCH => {authority} had a different fingerprint than we expected (expected: {expected}, actual: {actual}) +msg TOR_OUT_OF_DATE => The following authorities are an out of date version of tor: {authorities} +msg BADEXIT_OUT_OF_SYNC => Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for {fingerprint} (with flag: {with_flag}, without flag: {without_flag}) +msg BANDWIDTH_AUTHORITIES_OUT_OF_SYNC => Bandwidth authorities have a substantially different number of measured entries: {authorities}
# directory authorities that run bandwidth scanners