commit c6c28a04e6ca2f2ae1480a132ae8d1ddccecca00 Author: Nick Mathewson nickm@torproject.org Date: Mon Aug 12 10:37:20 2013 -0400
219-expanded-dns: include some XXs from Ondrej --- proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt b/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt index 07bd38d..b43e63e 100644 --- a/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt +++ b/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Status: Draft cells, with contents: [00 04 00] R2[0:495], [00] R2[495:992], and [01] R2[992:1024] respectively.
- The server should + The server should {XXXXX}.
[NOTE: I'm using the length field and the is-this-the-last-cell field to allow multi-packet responses in the future. -NM] @@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ Status: Draft code from OR. [XXXX Must they also refuse to report addresses that resolve to these? -NM]
+ [XXX I don't think so. People often use public DNS + records that map to private adresses. We can't effectively separate + "truly public" records from the ones client's dnsmasq or similar DNS + resolver returns. - OM] + + [XXX Then do you mean "must be returned as the DNS error from the OP"?] + Request for special names (.onion, .exit, .noconnect) must never be sent, and will return REFUSED.