commit 1bb4a4f9bdf24706a459e4aefb2b0fb75622f7ac
Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm(a)torproject.org>
Date: Tue Aug 20 14:52:56 2013 -0400
Send NETINFO on receiving a NETINFO if we have not yet sent one.
Relays previously, when initiating a connection, would only send a
NETINFO after sending an AUTHENTICATE. But bridges, when receiving a
connection, would never send AUTH_CHALLENGE. So relays wouldn't
AUTHENTICATE, and wouldn't NETINFO, and then bridges would be
surprised to be receiving CREATE cells on a non-open circuit.
Fixes bug 9546.
---
changes/bug9546 | 5 +++++
src/or/channeltls.c | 10 ++++++++++
src/or/connection_or.c | 7 +++++++
src/or/or.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/changes/bug9546 b/changes/bug9546
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8596eac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changes/bug9546
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+ o Major bugfixes:
+
+ - When a relay is extending a circuit to a bridge, it needs to send a
+ NETINFO cell, even when the bridge hasn't sent an AUTH_CHALLENGE
+ cell. Fixes bug 9546; bugfix on ????.
diff --git a/src/or/channeltls.c b/src/or/channeltls.c
index d758d22..a7953e7 100644
--- a/src/or/channeltls.c
+++ b/src/or/channeltls.c
@@ -1474,6 +1474,16 @@ channel_tls_process_netinfo_cell(cell_t *cell, channel_tls_t *chan)
/* XXX maybe act on my_apparent_addr, if the source is sufficiently
* trustworthy. */
+ if (! chan->conn->handshake_state->sent_netinfo) {
+ /* If we were prepared to authenticate, but we never got an AUTH_CHALLENGE
+ * cell, then we would not previously have sent a NETINFO cell. Do so
+ * now. */
+ if (connection_or_send_netinfo(chan->conn) < 0) {
+ connection_or_close_for_error(chan->conn, 0);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
if (connection_or_set_state_open(chan->conn) < 0) {
log_fn(LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN, LD_OR,
"Got good NETINFO cell from %s:%d; but "
diff --git a/src/or/connection_or.c b/src/or/connection_or.c
index 3616363..31cc9c7 100644
--- a/src/or/connection_or.c
+++ b/src/or/connection_or.c
@@ -2042,6 +2042,12 @@ connection_or_send_netinfo(or_connection_t *conn)
tor_assert(conn->handshake_state);
+ if (conn->handshake_state->sent_netinfo) {
+ log_warn(LD_BUG, "Attempted to send an extra netinfo cell on a connection "
+ "where we already sent one.");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
memset(&cell, 0, sizeof(cell_t));
cell.command = CELL_NETINFO;
@@ -2083,6 +2089,7 @@ connection_or_send_netinfo(or_connection_t *conn)
}
conn->handshake_state->digest_sent_data = 0;
+ conn->handshake_state->sent_netinfo = 1;
connection_or_write_cell_to_buf(&cell, conn);
return 0;
diff --git a/src/or/or.h b/src/or/or.h
index 3dc96b9..8c6c1e3 100644
--- a/src/or/or.h
+++ b/src/or/or.h
@@ -1357,6 +1357,9 @@ typedef struct or_handshake_state_t {
/* True iff we've received valid authentication to some identity. */
unsigned int authenticated : 1;
+ /* True iff we have sent a netinfo cell */
+ unsigned int sent_netinfo : 1;
+
/** True iff we should feed outgoing cells into digest_sent and
* digest_received respectively.
*