Hi!  I was wondering if ANY of the dark or deep web browsers featured on the Chrome/Google Play store are trustworthy in and of themselves, and if Tor can be accessed with them, or if any use Tor automatically. I have a Chromebook, and I know that Tor does not work with it as you have yet to develop a version for it. Why is it that I think that it will be impossible to have Tor work safely with Chrome/Chromebooks; because Google is EVIL?!  :-)    Who do you trust for DNS?  What is the world's most private and secure computer? I remember Australia having some cool guys build a n independent computer system, but these would not be available outside of Oz.  Comments? On Feb 24, 2023 at 7:00 AM, "anti-censorship-team-request@lists.torproject.org " <> wrote: --------------------------IronVest--------------------------- Preview: Send anti-censorship-team mailing list submissions to anti-ce --> SPAM? CLICK to BLOCK: https://ironvest.com/app/0/#emails/r8196gs9ev5p@opayq.com/toggle This email is Masked using Ironvest - it was sent from duck.com to r8196gs9ev5p@opayq.com (your reply stays Masked). To protect your privacy, do not forward this message, or add new recipients like CCs or BCCs. Thanks for being an IronVest customer! --------------------------IronVest--------------------------- Send anti-censorship-team mailing list submissions to anti-censorship-team@lists.torproject.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/anti-censorship-team or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to anti-censorship-team-request@lists.torproject.org You can reach the person managing the list at anti-censorship-team-owner@lists.torproject.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of anti-censorship-team digest..." Today's Topics: 1. onbasca and rdsys (meskio) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:47:19 +0100 From: meskio <meskio@torproject.org> To: anti-censorship-team <anti-censorship-team@lists.torproject.org> Subject: [anti-censorship-team] onbasca and rdsys Message-ID: <167723923930.1535.1605523355422205109@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello, Onbasca[0], a relay bandwidth, has just added support for testing bridges. I have modified rdsys to use it[1]. onbasca produces a bandwidth ratio, on how fast is a bridge compared to the rest of bridges (1 is the median), and rdsys decides if distribute a bridge if the ratio is higher than a configured threshold (right now 0.75) or if is jet untested. rdsys does ignore the onbasca results if there is less then 50% of bridges with high enough ratio to be distributed. As this was needed by a sponsor I have already deployed it in production. I wrote a survival guide: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/team/-/wikis/Onbasca-Survi... I tested it and I don't expect much problems, but as I will be AFK next week if rdsys gives any problem is easy to roll back to the previous version of rdsys without onbasca support. I left the previous binary of rdsys backend in ~/bin/rdsys-backend.old, so rolling back will be running as rdsys user in polyanthum: systemctl --user stop rdsys-backend mv ~/bin/rdsys-backend.old ~/bin/rdsys-backend systemdl --user start rdsys-backend [0] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/onbasca/ [1] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/rdsys/-/merge_requests/76 -- meskio | https://meskio.net/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Nos vamos a Croatan.