Tor documentation

[zzzjethro666 at email2me.net]

HI.
Thanks. Yes I am aware that much in Onion land cannot be trusted and everything should most likely be checked out as best one can. I will look at that log.

Thanks.






-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu>
To: or-talk at freehaven.net
Sent: Wed, Mar 3, 2010 12:22 pm
Subject: Re: Tor documentation


On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:18:17AM -0500, zzzjethro666 at email2me.net wrote:
 Here it is: The last two versions of TOR have not been documented,
thus cannot be trusted. Versions 0.2.1.22 and 0.2.1.21 are the only ones
that can be trusted (possibly only 0.2.1.21).
 Someone want to check or point me in the right direction and I will
attempt to find out.
You might like to peruse the ChangeLog file:
http://gitweb.torproject.org//tor.git?a=blob_plain;f=ChangeLog;hb=HEAD
ttp://gitweb.torproject.org//tor.git?a=blob_plain;f=ChangeLog;hb=maint-0.2.1
It seems this "onion forum" thing is full of misinformation, conspiracy
heories, and uninformed people. What a deal. :)
Of course, just because I give you a changelog file doesn't mean it's
uddenly trustworthy. http://gitweb.torproject.org//tor.git?a=tree should
et you walk through all the commits.
--Roger
***********************************************************************
o unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
nsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20100303/da4fea00/attachment.htm>