[tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you

[Tom van der Woerdt]

Let's hope so, as Unmetered hosts a pretty significant amount of exit 
traffic.

Several of my exits run there and I too received the abuse 
notifications. I've contacted Unmetered for clarification and will 
return to this thread as soon as I hear more.

The way unmetered has always handled abuse traffic is simple: customer 
gets 3 days to respond to the message, or the server gets temporarily 
disconnected. I don't think there's any human interaction with abuse 
reports on their side.

Tom


Tim Semeijn schreef op 07/06/15 om 12:06:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Company unmetered.com (used to be running under PlusServer which is a
> 'premium' brand of Intergenia but now seems to be running on link11
> network) did and probably still does allow Tor Exit nodes to be run on
> their services. How they handled the generated abuse from these nodes
> 'upstream' is the big question.
>
> On 7-6-2015 10:29, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote:
>> Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed
>> them quite a time in their AGB's.
>>
>> Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb "Dr. Who"
>> <drwho at posteo.is>:
>>> Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday:
>>
>>> "Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit
>>> Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate
>>> such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this
>>> service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your
>>> Intergenia Abuse Team"
>>
>>> followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay
>>> server.
>>
>>> First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who
>>> might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me.
>>> It should have listed only my own IP number.
>>
>>> Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit
>>> and relay servers.
>>
>>> I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep
>>> relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that
>>> case.
>>
>>> Just letting you know...
>>> _______________________________________________ tor-relays
>>> mailing list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
>> list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>
> - --
> Tim Semeijn
> Babylon Network
> pgp 0x5B8A4DDF
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVdBemAAoJEIZioqpbik3fpKcP/is+ItLJ9Ab/QooRgt3w0l/7
> vdBiPLk9vAoxrGnfJl7IjqmZZUE4BfNbjUV3HJbMh8uUnTTxSlxK8BmR6NcRVdqR
> ogl7BFM5lYL1+8mtuUE6hc5Gs5nZXJbLkrREofq7Qan9ma5tyRQKcr6ipGYDQ9oL
> 4yke8ZMhsCHEDmfr1JSmEtxYVeG8Bx7BB1vj2NzUGl54OamII4/SZRGWsoQhDnTQ
> Uq5WytNOancOdQNM+CbkAcrfKRa4xzYc7Aq21hU/EViv7Z3YSRz0QFWRRPx1aoWe
> UAV4ce5m9POtqIpZJbZqJWD0nw1hxmwUe1fn+BwfHucUSaO/eUqA1uM/TEBnQnWv
> SANTaVg+L+kqn1owCmYLBpk78U2C7Z8r0GrofwI3BHN+xMDZJi8V7gywKZhiTbUZ
> sJkMdTtuJkoTKH4RGfZlSgoxIXP4COzz/S0RNhGWCOk0+rLTATkkFfSJoNaLJixD
> g/xSe2hx34vZ5UA7k7iXQZ3W4AxOasQTc3siZycccu/m8nk826LB366kkx3+misl
> txIRExXqzRX4QzqPuO1XwVnJ5HXjG6FlFMGI5uJ/svzKD679IZqNj0ZVJ5ivT0p4
> eFzcsLxBcQcZEQDm6nL5zZ2l39fxClZgE/R20TDGYVIsGl+qhhnxe4099NaoEPSq
> lo2mhFvlH4plBDp/hs5M
> =or38
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3729 bytes
Desc: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150607/01101117/attachment.bin>