Proposal 105 (handshake revision) needs more thought
watsonbladd at gmail.com
Sun Mar 11 23:11:53 UTC 2007
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Proposal 105 looks like a nice start. For those of you who haven't
> already read it, go look at
> I've got a few questions/comments, based on trying to write the
> "Advertising versions in routerdescs and networkstatuses" section.
Won't the use of a VERSION cell prevent the use of a low-latency
protocol since we will be waiting for the VERSION cell before going
forwards with the handshake?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the tor-dev