Proposal 105 (handshake revision) needs more thought

Roger Dingledine arma at
Sun Mar 11 23:21:14 UTC 2007

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:11:53PM -0400, Watson Ladd wrote:
> >
> Won't the use of a VERSION cell prevent the use of a low-latency
> protocol since we will be waiting for the VERSION cell before going
> forwards with the handshake?

What the heck is a "low-latency protocol"?

Also, notice that this is the TLS handshake we're talking about here.
Not the circuit handshake.


More information about the tor-dev mailing list