[tor-bugs] #9164 [Flashproxy]: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and questions

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#9164: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and
questions
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  Aymeric     |       Owner:  dcf   
        Type:  defect      |      Status:  closed
    Priority:  normal      |   Milestone:        
   Component:  Flashproxy  |     Version:        
  Resolution:  duplicate   |    Keywords:        
      Parent:              |      Points:        
Actualpoints:              |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by Aymeric):

 I have my own already, see https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor

 While testing flashproxy (which I did really too fast, sorry again) I
 could not guess the system was so vulnerable, thought it was still in a
 testing phase.

 I will read the paper again but against browsers I don't see what you can
 rate-limit (ie advantadges of the solution can be used against it).

 And whether the js code is open or not, you should at least minify the
 online version, and wrap the code, and use prototype, etc, imho as
 everybody does.

 And it's interesting to know what nodes are supporting what PT (Atlas?)

 That's not negative comments, the concept is great, like webRTC, like
 hopefully things I am doing.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9164#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online