[tor-bugs] #9164 [Flashproxy]: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and questions

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Sat Jun 29 20:36:22 UTC 2013


#9164: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and
questions
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  Aymeric     |       Owner:  dcf   
        Type:  defect      |      Status:  closed
    Priority:  normal      |   Milestone:        
   Component:  Flashproxy  |     Version:        
  Resolution:  duplicate   |    Keywords:        
      Parent:              |      Points:        
Actualpoints:              |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by bastik):

 Replying to [comment:9 Aymeric]:
 > And it's interesting to know what nodes are supporting what PT (Atlas?)

 Atlas does not support Bridges, yet.

 Bridges report their supported transports to BridgeDB, but that should not
 apply to Flashproxy, as far as I know.

 The data-source for Atlas, Onionoo [1], has some data available, although
 the format is not designed to be read by humans.

 https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?type=bridge

 If you look at "poolassignment  [...] transport=" you see obfs2, obfs3 for
 some bridges. This is based on the information in which distribution
 pool(s) a bridge is. This information is not available for relays as those
 are public.

 [1] Protocol overview: https://onionoo.torproject.org/

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9164#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list