[tor-bugs] #9164 [Flashproxy]: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and questions
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Sat Jun 29 20:36:22 UTC 2013
#9164: Is Flashproxy pluggable transport really working? Tests, comments and
questions
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: Aymeric | Owner: dcf
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Flashproxy | Version:
Resolution: duplicate | Keywords:
Parent: | Points:
Actualpoints: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by bastik):
Replying to [comment:9 Aymeric]:
> And it's interesting to know what nodes are supporting what PT (Atlas?)
Atlas does not support Bridges, yet.
Bridges report their supported transports to BridgeDB, but that should not
apply to Flashproxy, as far as I know.
The data-source for Atlas, Onionoo [1], has some data available, although
the format is not designed to be read by humans.
https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?type=bridge
If you look at "poolassignment [...] transport=" you see obfs2, obfs3 for
some bridges. This is based on the information in which distribution
pool(s) a bridge is. This information is not available for relays as those
are public.
[1] Protocol overview: https://onionoo.torproject.org/
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9164#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list